Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

Speaking of you living in a racist state, I'll be visiting Columbus soon to possibly purchase a very rare 1991 Audi 200 Avant. That's right, the world's fastest station wagon (at the time). Are you the seller by chance? Can I get a discount?

Nope. Not me. Interesting though. I'm curious, what has attracted you to this car? I'm not a car guy, but my limited knowledge tells me that 1991 Audis aren't the most reliable cars on the planet, and now this one is 18 years old! Cars from 1991 also rust unlike most cars today. Anyway, please educate me.

That's 28 years old!

Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Nope. Not me. Interesting though. I'm curious, what has attracted you to this car? I'm not a car guy, but my limited knowledge tells me that 1991 Audis aren't the most reliable cars on the planet, and now this one is 18 years old! Cars from 1991 also rust unlike most cars today. Anyway, please educate me.

That's 28 years old!

Actually, 29 years old.

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

Speaking of you living in a racist state, I'll be visiting Columbus soon to possibly purchase a very rare 1991 Audi 200 Avant. That's right, the world's fastest station wagon (at the time). Are you the seller by chance? Can I get a discount?

Nope. Not me. Interesting though. I'm curious, what has attracted you to this car? I'm not a car guy, but my limited knowledge tells me that 1991 Audis aren't the most reliable cars on the planet, and now this one is 18 years old! Cars from 1991 also rust unlike most cars today. Anyway, please educate me.

You guys should hook up when he's in town. Perhaps take a math class together.

Faux News wrote:

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Because he didn't.

It's now a conclusive FACT that he didn't call POTUS right after the meeting. Do you never step out of the echo chamber? I mean, come on, people. "Another fake news story bites the dust." HA

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/31/trump-donald-trump-jr-trump-tower-calls-1140930

Politico? Really. What is it so false that Faux News wouldn't report it?

If you simply Google it, you'll see that it was front page news for every news outlet (NYT, WaPo, FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc.).

He didn't call his father after the meetings. Like Jr tweeted that day, another fake news story bites the dust. That was in the awesome 2-3 months period where a fake news story was popping up and being exposed every darn week.

23 Republicans voted AGAINST a resolution condemning bigotry. Let that sink in for a minute.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Faux News wrote:

Politico? Really. What is it so false that Faux News wouldn't report it?

If you simply Google it, you'll see that it was front page news for every news outlet (NYT, WaPo, FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc.).

He didn't call his father after the meetings. Like Jr tweeted that day, another fake news story bites the dust. That was in the awesome 2-3 months period where a fake news story was popping up and being exposed every darn week.

Hmmmmmm..... wonder what Ohr was so concerned about being "exposed"..... HA

"Of particular concern to Republican lawmakers was a previously revealed text Ohr sent to Steele, saying, "very concerned (abt) about [former FBI Director James] Comey's firing -- afraid they will be exposed." Comey was fired in May 2017."

Silliest of Willies wrote:

nontrumper wrote:

2) Then why did Don Jr. call POTUS right after the meeting?

Because he didn't.

It's now a conclusive FACT that he didn't call POTUS right after the meeting. Do you never step out of the echo chamber? I mean, come on, people. "Another fake news story bites the dust." HA

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/31/trump-donald-trump-jr-trump-tower-calls-1140930

The issue is whether Trump knew about the meeting beforehand and Junior not calling him directly after it ended does not prove anything. Trump lied later about the meeting and during a speech shortly before the meeting he claimed he would provide new dirt on the Clintons in his next speech:

TrumpSoFunny wrote:

Nothing to see here at all...

https://twitter.com/jeffreyguterman/status/1104022513728872450?s=21

What a disgrace. This story probably gets worse...

Gang of 23 wrote:

23 Republicans voted AGAINST a resolution condemning bigotry. Let that sink in for a minute.

And EVERY Democrat voted AGAINST a measure to protect against INFANTICIDE. Yes, every Democrat voted to allow doctors to deny health care to babies born healthy. In essence they voted to kill babies. Infanticide. Beyond despicable. It is Auschwitz redone.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

That's 28 years old!

Actually, 29 years old.

Not until later this year. New models came out at the end of the year in the 1990s.

Gang of 23 wrote:

23 Republicans voted AGAINST a resolution condemning bigotry. Let that sink in for a minute.

Mostly from the Freedumb Caucus.

Here’s a short guide to Trump’s ethics.

Is my action both legal and ethical? Great I’ll do it and will run some public victory laps so everyone knows how great I am.

Is my action legal but unethical? No problem, I’ll do it anyway and will call out the hypocrites to draw equivalence.

Is my action illegal and unethical AND I can get away with it? I can do it but will probably have one of my loyal minions do it (including family members) and if and when $hit blows up I will throw them under the bus.

Is my action illegal and unethical AND I can’t get away with it? Wah wah ???unfair, I’m your king!

Trollminator wrote:

Here’s a short guide to Trump’s ethics.

Is my action both legal and ethical? Great I’ll do it and will run some public victory laps so everyone knows how great I am.

Is my action legal but unethical? No problem, I’ll do it anyway and will call out the hypocrites to draw equivalence.

Is my action illegal and unethical AND I can get away with it? I can do it but will probably have one of my loyal minions do it (including family members) and if and when $hit blows up I will throw them under the bus.

Is my action illegal and unethical AND I can’t get away with it? Wah wah ???unfair, I’m your king!

Single question for you Trollimator, for Flagpole, for agip and for everyone else- are okay with killing babies?

Can't believe i'm responding to this - I must really be avoiding work today.

But infanticide is and always has been against the law.

Can we stop with the legislative tricks?

I won't respond anymore to abortion posts.

Going to be massive turnout in 2020 to reject democrat stupidity.

Democrats lose again!!!

Sally Vix wrote:

Gang of 23 wrote:

23 Republicans voted AGAINST a resolution condemning bigotry. Let that sink in for a minute.

And EVERY Democrat voted AGAINST a measure to protect against INFANTICIDE. Yes, every Democrat voted to allow doctors to deny health care to babies born healthy. In essence they voted to kill babies. Infanticide. Beyond despicable. It is Auschwitz redone.

And both cases are dumb political grandstanding.

There are already laws outlawing killing infants.

A resolution saying bigotry is bad doesn’t do anything.

Alan

An article for you to read, Flagpole

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/08/everyone-is-underestimating-trump-it-could-hurt-democrats-republicans-alike/?utm_term=.61f6bde7a9d5

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/8/house-votes-favor-illegal-immigrant-voting/

Going to be massive turnout in 2020 to reject democrat stupidity.

Democrats lose again!!!

Non-Citizens can’t vote in federal elections. They can vote in some local elections:

Alan