Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Legitimate Poster wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Trumpers, are you on board with this?:

"When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn! The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!" - Donald J. Trump

So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can win in 2020, a way to being the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner.

You guys elected this monster.

1. "When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn!" Absolutely. One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise.

2. "The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!" Absolutely. I, like the Democrats, believe they do not have a reasonable chance to win the 2020 Presidential election.

3. "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can win in 2020, a way to being the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner." I'm not sure this is a legitimate (or coherent) sentence. If you would like to engage in a legitimate discussion, please make your point comprehensible.

Flagpole wrote:

Legitimate Poster wrote:

1. "When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn!" Absolutely. One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise.

2. "The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!" Absolutely. I, like the Democrats, believe they do not have a reasonable chance to win the 2020 Presidential election.

3. "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can win in 2020, a way to being the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner." I'm not sure this is a legitimate (or coherent) sentence. If you would like to engage in a legitimate discussion, please make your point comprehensible.

1) Correct. Not really the main part of his quote that I was focusing on.

2) Trump did use "legitimately", not "reasonable". I submit that it is entirely possible that he does not know the meaning of the word.

3) You are correct. That was not a coherent sentence due mostly to a typo resulting in the wrong word, but I also added a new word to help with clarity. Both words are in the sentence in ALL CAPS. Here it is again - "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can LEGITIMATELY win in 2020, a way to BEGIN the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner."

You pointed out something that I did that was sub par. I was wrong. I was unclear and incomplete. For that I apologize unreservedly. Tonight, I will write a song in D minor (Dm) to help me cope with the feelings of the day.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Correct. Not really the main part of his quote that I was focusing on.

2) Trump did use "legitimately", not "reasonable". I submit that it is entirely possible that he does not know the meaning of the word.

3) You are correct. That was not a coherent sentence due mostly to a typo resulting in the wrong word, but I also added a new word to help with clarity. Both words are in the sentence in ALL CAPS. Here it is again - "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can LEGITIMATELY win in 2020, a way to BEGIN the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner."

You pointed out something that I did that was sub par. I was wrong. I was unclear and incomplete. For that I apologize unreservedly. Tonight, I will write a song in D minor (Dm) to help me cope with the feelings of the day.

But that was not an unreserved apology. You blamed it on a typo "...due mostly to a typo..." . Can you ever just apologize without qualifying it?

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Correct. Not really the main part of his quote that I was focusing on.

2) Trump did use "legitimately", not "reasonable". I submit that it is entirely possible that he does not know the meaning of the word.

3) You are correct. That was not a coherent sentence due mostly to a typo resulting in the wrong word, but I also added a new word to help with clarity. Both words are in the sentence in ALL CAPS. Here it is again - "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can LEGITIMATELY win in 2020, a way to BEGIN the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner."

You pointed out something that I did that was sub par. I was wrong. I was unclear and incomplete. For that I apologize unreservedly. Tonight, I will write a song in D minor (Dm) to help me cope with the feelings of the day.

But that was not an unreserved apology. You blamed it on a typo "...due mostly to a typo..." . Can you ever just apologize without qualifying it?

Flagpole wrote:

Legitimate Poster wrote:

1. "When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn!" Absolutely. One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise.

2. "The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!" Absolutely. I, like the Democrats, believe they do not have a reasonable chance to win the 2020 Presidential election.

3. "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can win in 2020, a way to being the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner." I'm not sure this is a legitimate (or coherent) sentence. If you would like to engage in a legitimate discussion, please make your point comprehensible.

1) Correct. Not really the main part of his quote that I was focusing on.

2) Trump did use "legitimately", not "reasonable". I submit that it is entirely possible that he does not know the meaning of the word.

3) You are correct. That was not a coherent sentence due mostly to a typo resulting in the wrong word, but I also added a new word to help with clarity. Both words are in the sentence in ALL CAPS. Here it is again - "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can LEGITIMATELY win in 2020, a way to BEGIN the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner."

You pointed out something that I did that was sub par. I was wrong. I was unclear and incomplete. For that I apologize unreservedly. Tonight, I will write a song in D minor (Dm) to help me cope with the feelings of the day.

Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole the Deflector wrote:

Yep. Totally onboard pal.

Ok. Interesting. You are totally on board with what he said. Now, again, I submit that perhaps Trump doesn't know what "legitimately" means, but he is suggesting there that if they win the election that it is MIGHT NOT BE not legitimate, and knowing him, that is likely what he meant there.

I would like to see every possible scenario play out just out of curiosity.

Here are the ones I am interested in seeing:

1) Trump resigning.

2) Trump being impeached and convicted by the Senate.

3) Trump being impeached and then acquitted by the Senate.

4) Trump still in office with no impeachment proceedings and yet losing the election in 2020.

5) Trump still in office with no impeachment proceedings and WINNING in 2020.

Obviously I most want to see him out of office (legally) as soon as possible, but I am curious about all the other possibilities. Oh well, we can only see one.

Legitimate Poster wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Correct. Not really the main part of his quote that I was focusing on.

2) Trump did use "legitimately", not "reasonable". I submit that it is entirely possible that he does not know the meaning of the word.

3) You are correct. That was not a coherent sentence due mostly to a typo resulting in the wrong word, but I also added a new word to help with clarity. Both words are in the sentence in ALL CAPS. Here it is again - "So, he's suggesting that he doesn't believe a Democrat can LEGITIMATELY win in 2020, a way to BEGIN the process of not accepting any election result that doesn't have him as the winner."

You pointed out something that I did that was sub par. I was wrong. I was unclear and incomplete. For that I apologize unreservedly. Tonight, I will write a song in D minor (Dm) to help me cope with the feelings of the day.

2. However, I submit that he understands the definitions of "legitimately." Please consult a dictionary and/or thesaurus if you would like to continue this discussion.

3. A "typo" excludes errors of ignorance like yours.

I've now decided that I'm not going to respond to you again. It is apparent that you have difficulty formulating a coherent argument and have a poor grasp of basic grammar. I find it extremely frustrating to discuss topics with people like you.