Trump fails geography and history with one twittering
We have a MASSIVE trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay FAR LESS than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for U.S. This will change
Trump fails geography and history with one twittering
We have a MASSIVE trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay FAR LESS than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for U.S. This will change
Monkeys typing wrote:
EPIC Flagpole wrote:I'm seeing more and more "ifs" out of you guys lately. All your posts are based on "if" scenarios now. You can't see that?
The ability to consider and evaluate potential and alternative future scenarios is a significant distinction between human reasoning and that of lower life forms. It's odd that you see this sort of thing as a problem.
In other words, Trumpkins are a lower life form
TroLLminator wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:The ability to consider and evaluate potential and alternative future scenarios is a significant distinction between human reasoning and that of lower life forms. It's odd that you see this sort of thing as a problem.
In other words, Trumpkins are a lower life form
That is what the monkey typed. Typical Trumpkin low-IQ self exposed.
Fat hurts wrote:
There is a tipping point for Republicans. If they think that Trump is going to be impeached then they will want to do it before the end of this year. That way, the mess is cleaned up and they can try to project a hopeful future with a new Republican president during midterm elections.
Frankly, it's going to be really hard to get it done that fast. Mueller is just getting started and they ideally needs some indictments first.
I disagree - they knew their party was being hijacked in the primaries and they did nothing to stop it. They know the now president Trump is controlling the Republican narrative and they are doing nothing to stop it. They can do something to stop it, but they won't because they were a fractured party before Trump and even worse now with him. The GOP doesn't have a message of a hopeful future. They are sitting ducks, wishing is why I think the next midterms can be devastating for them.
NEWS FLASH! wrote:
Congress expands Russia investigation to include Trump's personal attorney
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/russia-investigation-expands-include-donald-trumps-personal-attorney/story?id=47646601
Trump's aol lawyer going down, shocking
TroLLminator wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:There is a tipping point for Republicans. If they think that Trump is going to be impeached then they will want to do it before the end of this year. That way, the mess is cleaned up and they can try to project a hopeful future with a new Republican president during midterm elections.
Frankly, it's going to be really hard to get it done that fast. Mueller is just getting started and they ideally needs some indictments first.
I disagree - they knew their party was being hijacked in the primaries and they did nothing to stop it. They know the now president Trump is controlling the Republican narrative and they are doing nothing to stop it. They can do something to stop it, but they won't because they were a fractured party before Trump and even worse now with him. The GOP doesn't have a message of a hopeful future. They are sitting ducks, wishing is why I think the next midterms can be devastating for them.
how could the GOP have stopped trump in the primaries?
Wah, wah, no! You can't make me!
- Donald Trump
Tick, tick, tick.
lol wah wah wah, I'm treated so unfairly wah wah wah, The media they are a bunch of liars, they are fake they are fake, its not fair.
TroLLminator wrote:The GOP doesn't have a message of a hopeful future.
Sure they do, for those in power in a plutocracy, there is a very hopeful future.
Since it's your fault you aren't a plutocrat, then it sucks to be you.
You can't make this stuff up....
bigtime wrote:
You can't make this stuff up....
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-does-not-read-white-house-top-secret-intelligence-briefings-big-617515
what is it with Republicans electing dumb presidents?
Reagan was the same way - he wouldn't read anything, and didnt' really care, so they had to make little movies to keep his attention.
And then dopey bush the second.
it's like they don't want brainy people telling them what to do. So they elect reagan, who has the most corrupt presidency of modern times, bush2, who took peace and prosperity and created two wars and a financial crisis, and Trump, who is trying to wreck 70 years of western peace and prosperity in one year.
ya'll dumb or something?
eric a blair wrote:
TroLLminator wrote:I disagree - they knew their party was being hijacked in the primaries and they did nothing to stop it. They know the now president Trump is controlling the Republican narrative and they are doing nothing to stop it. They can do something to stop it, but they won't because they were a fractured party before Trump and even worse now with him. The GOP doesn't have a message of a hopeful future. They are sitting ducks, wishing is why I think the next midterms can be devastating for them.
how could the GOP have stopped trump in the primaries?
Even in the early stages, Trump had strong polling results. The alarms should have been going off and whatever could be called the leadership should have begun strategizing a way to contain him. The party was fragmented and there was no clear leadership, so of course they did nothing but sit on the sidelines and watch. Even the donors and lobbyists saw it coming and didn't act until it was too late. Here's what they could have done had the party had strong leadership with the ability to combine their powers:
1. Denounce Trump and label him a republican imposter. Instead they pretended he wasn't a threat.
2. At least on the surface present themselves as a unified unified party with strong principles and a practical plan for the nation. The 16+ other candidates and just about every GOPer did nothing but blame Obama for anything that's ever gone wrong. People were sick of hearing just that, they wanted to see someone actually say they were going to do something about it.
3. They could have driven the narrative. Instead they let Trump make the headlines and didn't even react, let alone try to steal his thunder.
You can't say they were victims. I know they made their beds but that sure didn't stop them from being proactive when it became obvious Trump was a threat.
TroLLminator wrote:
eric a blair wrote:how could the GOP have stopped trump in the primaries?
Even in the early stages, Trump had strong polling results. The alarms should have been going off and whatever could be called the leadership should have begun strategizing a way to contain him. The party was fragmented and there was no clear leadership, so of course they did nothing but sit on the sidelines and watch. Even the donors and lobbyists saw it coming and didn't act until it was too late. Here's what they could have done had the party had strong leadership with the ability to combine their powers:
1. Denounce Trump and label him a republican imposter. Instead they pretended he wasn't a threat.
2. At least on the surface present themselves as a unified unified party with strong principles and a practical plan for the nation. The 16+ other candidates and just about every GOPer did nothing but blame Obama for anything that's ever gone wrong. People were sick of hearing just that, they wanted to see someone actually say they were going to do something about it.
3. They could have driven the narrative. Instead they let Trump make the headlines and didn't even react, let alone try to steal his thunder.
You can't say they were victims. I know they made their beds but that sure didn't stop them from being proactive when it became obvious Trump was a threat.
The Republican party leaders knew their base. Their knew what moves their base. Trump approach where he would assail and make fun of rivals with stupid little names would resonate with the Republican base. Those who attempted to challenge Trump like lyin Ted, Little Rubio, low energy Jeb, ugly Carly were hurt politically by the names.
They mostly played it safe and look what happened.
TroLLminator wrote:
eric a blair wrote:how could the GOP have stopped trump in the primaries?
Even in the early stages, Trump had strong polling results. The alarms should have been going off and whatever could be called the leadership should have begun strategizing a way to contain him. The party was fragmented and there was no clear leadership, so of course they did nothing but sit on the sidelines and watch. Even the donors and lobbyists saw it coming and didn't act until it was too late. Here's what they could have done had the party had strong leadership with the ability to combine their powers:
1. Denounce Trump and label him a republican imposter. Instead they pretended he wasn't a threat.
2. At least on the surface present themselves as a unified unified party with strong principles and a practical plan for the nation. The 16+ other candidates and just about every GOPer did nothing but blame Obama for anything that's ever gone wrong. People were sick of hearing just that, they wanted to see someone actually say they were going to do something about it.
3. They could have driven the narrative. Instead they let Trump make the headlines and didn't even react, let alone try to steal his thunder.
You can't say they were victims. I know they made their beds but that sure didn't stop them from being proactive when it became obvious Trump was a threat.
They tried everything you mentioned. The PEOPLE wanted something different this time around. The Democrats don't care what their voters want ("party over country", eh?), which Wikileaks confirmed.
I don't know a single Trump voter that regrets voting for him. Not one. The media resistance only perpetuates more hatred toward the Left (and the Right in some instances). They constantly lied and mislead voters lading up to the election, and they've only upper their failed strategy since. The headlines are ludicrous, most of the stories are speculation, and sources of course are anonymous. CNN doesn't report actual news anymore; they're obsessed with Trump, Trump, Trump. Nothing they (media/establishment) do will get gain trust back. "Fake news" indeed.
Dems aren't getting the House back in 2018, and at least one more SCOTUS seat will be filled (probably two) in the next few years. Get ready for a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS, folks. OUCH.
You folks on the Left are wasting time attacking the POTUS. You should be formulating a message that resonates with voters outside of NY and CA.
I challenge you to come up with a message that isn't based on race/identity. "If" you can, I promise you people will listen.
Spicer said today that Merkel and Trump had an unbelievable relationship it was so good.
Spicer has NO sense of personal dignity or ethics. How STUPID does he (and Trump) think we are. Tell us black is white and we will believe it?
Passedout wrote:
TroLLminator wrote:Even in the early stages, Trump had strong polling results. The alarms should have been going off and whatever could be called the leadership should have begun strategizing a way to contain him. The party was fragmented and there was no clear leadership, so of course they did nothing but sit on the sidelines and watch. Even the donors and lobbyists saw it coming and didn't act until it was too late. Here's what they could have done had the party had strong leadership with the ability to combine their powers:
1. Denounce Trump and label him a republican imposter. Instead they pretended he wasn't a threat.
2. At least on the surface present themselves as a unified unified party with strong principles and a practical plan for the nation. The 16+ other candidates and just about every GOPer did nothing but blame Obama for anything that's ever gone wrong. People were sick of hearing just that, they wanted to see someone actually say they were going to do something about it.
3. They could have driven the narrative. Instead they let Trump make the headlines and didn't even react, let alone try to steal his thunder.
You can't say they were victims. I know they made their beds but that sure didn't stop them from being proactive when it became obvious Trump was a threat.
They tried everything you mentioned. The PEOPLE wanted something different this time around. The Democrats don't care what their voters want ("party over country", eh?), which Wikileaks confirmed.
I don't know a single Trump voter that regrets voting for him. Not one. The media resistance only perpetuates more hatred toward the Left (and the Right in some instances). They constantly lied and mislead voters lading up to the election, and they've only upper their failed strategy since. The headlines are ludicrous, most of the stories are speculation, and sources of course are anonymous. CNN doesn't report actual news anymore; they're obsessed with Trump, Trump, Trump. Nothing they (media/establishment) do will get gain trust back. "Fake news" indeed.
Dems aren't getting the House back in 2018, and at least one more SCOTUS seat will be filled (probably two) in the next few years. Get ready for a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS, folks. OUCH.
You folks on the Left are wasting time attacking the POTUS. You should be formulating a message that resonates with voters outside of NY and CA.
I challenge you to come up with a message that isn't based on race/identity. "If" you can, I promise you people will listen.
McCain said the Putin is a greater threat to us that ISIS, but you see no evil in Putin do you?
Putin's interference in our election is a nonissue for you, right?
Love is blind.
Nobody puts much stock in the russia thing. Only cucks and no-brains. Seth Rich story is blowing up and recent showings of Waters, Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz, pocahontas etc are embarrassing - they know what's going to happen
well....... wrote:
Spicer has NO sense of personal dignity or ethics. How STUPID does he (and Trump) think we are. Tell us black is white and we will believe it?
The words were intended to Rock-a-bye the Orange Baby who was BIGLY whining and crying all weekend long. They had not real meaning, otherwise.
Independent wrote:
Nobody puts much stock in the russia thing. Only cucks and no-brains. Seth Rich story is blowing up and recent showings of Waters, Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz, pocahontas etc are embarrassing - they know what's going to happen
Jamin, were ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO POST until you break 15m AND 100k
Rock-a-Bye Baby wrote:
well....... wrote:Spicer has NO sense of personal dignity or ethics. How STUPID does he (and Trump) think we are. Tell us black is white and we will believe it?
The words were intended to Rock-a-bye the Orange Baby who was BIGLY whining and crying all weekend long. They had not real meaning, otherwise.
I know who is telling him to say it but Spicer is saying it. At some point he needs to have some dignity and just say I am not saying something so stupid and dishonest. But Spicer has NO dignity.