Coach wrote:
I don't doubt Bill's romance story, I think he genuinely loves her but there is no physical or sexual attraction. She's probably too driven, serious and not interested in sex with him.
Chelsea Hubbell agrees with you.
Coach wrote:
I don't doubt Bill's romance story, I think he genuinely loves her but there is no physical or sexual attraction. She's probably too driven, serious and not interested in sex with him.
Chelsea Hubbell agrees with you.
wejo wrote:
As for threads being deleted there are tons of political threads on both sides deleted right now.
I restored the Groberg one. That one should never have been deleted.
Great, but you're letting ridiculous anti-DNC threads remain.
biased as can be wrote:
wejo wrote:As for threads being deleted there are tons of political threads on both sides deleted right now.
I restored the Groberg one. That one should never have been deleted.
Great, but you're letting ridiculous anti-DNC threads remain.
I see there was another Groberg thread so that is probably why the second one got deleted.
Moderating is more art than science. There are also threads up about The Trump Campaign Caught Lying About Malania Trump's Non-Existent College Degree
Trump and the Russian emails, etc.
No pol
wejo wrote:
biased as can be wrote:Great, but you're letting ridiculous anti-DNC threads remain.
I see there was another Groberg thread so that is probably why the second one got deleted.
Moderating is more art than science. There are also threads up about The Trump Campaign Caught Lying About Malania Trump's Non-Existent College Degree
Trump and the Russian emails, etc.
No pol
Sorry wejo, but I don't think that's true. I was the one who created the Groberg thread. I created it less than 2 minutes after Groberg spoke. And I looked at the front page to ensure there wasn't another thread. There was only one thread, it was mine, and it was deleted.
I'm not saying moderating is easy, but... okay, yes I am. Moderating is not an art. You just use common sense. And you've clearly hired a bunch of right-wing baby boomers to moderate your forums.
Hillary bordering on saying "Let's make America great again!"
Hey Cankles, why are you blaming Wall Street? Goldman Sachs pays you $250k per speech.
Coach wrote:
I don't doubt Bill's romance story, I think he genuinely loves her but there is no physical or sexual attraction. She's probably too driven, serious and not interested in sex with him.
Ha!Ha!Ha! Everyone's a comedian tonight, including Coach!
Hillary's grandfather OWNED the mill! Look it up! What a lying witch!
According to my sources on the ground she's having throat problems delivering her speech. What's wrong with her? What health issues are her acolytes hiding from the world???
WIth 45% of the delegates supporting The Bern, de-colonization will become a major issue when Hillary takes office in January 2017.
Clinton will bury Trump slowly, with boring, legitimate policy proposal after boring, legitimate policy proposal, while Katy Perry screeches and wobbles her boobs in the background.
That was the worst speech of both conventions. Trump will rip her to shreds in the debates.
Could you hear all the booing on TV or did they find a way to edit that out? It was pretty loud on some phone videos.
didn't watch on TV wrote:
Could you hear all the booing on TV or did they find a way to edit that out? It was pretty loud on some phone videos.
I did hear them start chanting Hillary, Hillary at random times. That usually means someone is protesting. Same thing at Trump rallies.
I didn't hear booing.
I did see NBC very briefly show some lady looking really pissed off. Just standing there not impressed by the speech. Instead of showing that they immediately jumped to some people cheering. I get you don't want to let one or two people paint an inaccurate picture of the entire place but I think showing a little dissent is more accurate.
wejo wrote:
didn't watch on TV wrote:Could you hear all the booing on TV or did they find a way to edit that out? It was pretty loud on some phone videos.
I did hear them start chanting Hillary, Hillary at random times. That usually means someone is protesting. Same thing at Trump rallies.
I didn't hear booing.
I did see NBC very briefly show some lady looking really pissed off. Just standing there not impressed by the speech. Instead of showing that they immediately jumped to some people cheering. I get you don't want to let one or two people paint an inaccurate picture of the entire place but I think showing a little dissent is more accurate.
Wejo
Why dont you guys just create a politics tab for the forum. Or why not just encourage users to click on the running only button?
I'm currently in the Green Party camp but I've been willing to give Hillary a chance to convince me. Unfortunately she didn't do it for me in this speech.
A big problem for me is when she went through a list of things she would accomplish. They all sounded good enough. But then she said as proof that she could achieve those things, you just had to look at her record. That one sentence ruined everything that came before it. Her record is caving in to corporate interests and hiding behind that rationale of "political feasibility" and "getting things done".
She still sounded militarist w/o giving any clear end game of what her militarism aims to achieve.
She went off on Trump. Problem with that is, Hillary knew very well years ago the character of Trump. How he treated women. How sleazy he was as a businessman. Yet Hillary and Bill decided to go to Trump's wedding and laugh it up with him. I just don't like the character of Hillary.
In the end I may be scared enough of Trump to vote for Hillary. But its going to take a lot to not vote my conscience and vote for someone who is not even in the ballpark of what I want as a President.
This will never be reported by the mainstream media, but the DNC installed white noise machines in the California delegate section to quiet the Bernie supporters. Here is a video from one of the CA delegates.
More proof that the Democrat party is more fractured than the public realizes..
Go Trump! wrote:
That was the worst speech of both conventions. Trump will rip her to shreds in the debates.
Take your Trump blinders off. Loosen you extra-small Trump underpants. Trump is DONE. Trump will implode during the debates the minute someone asks him to explain his ideas. "Be quite!" "Shut up!" "None of your f-ing business!" "Get in the kitchen, and make me a sandwich!"
ryan foreman wrote:
I'm currently in the Green Party camp but I've been willing to give Hillary a chance to convince me. Unfortunately she didn't do it for me in this speech.
A big problem for me is when she went through a list of things she would accomplish. They all sounded good enough. But then she said as proof that she could achieve those things, you just had to look at her record. That one sentence ruined everything that came before it. Her record is caving in to corporate interests and hiding behind that rationale of "political feasibility" and "getting things done".
She still sounded militarist w/o giving any clear end game of what her militarism aims to achieve.
She went off on Trump. Problem with that is, Hillary knew very well years ago the character of Trump. How he treated women. How sleazy he was as a businessman. Yet Hillary and Bill decided to go to Trump's wedding and laugh it up with him. I just don't like the character of Hillary.
In the end I may be scared enough of Trump to vote for Hillary. But its going to take a lot to not vote my conscience and vote for someone who is not even in the ballpark of what I want as a President.
She's voted against tax cuts for high earners, she's voted against repealing the estate tax, she'll keep pushing for important environmental regulations, and she flat out stated in clear terms that she will make every possible effort to repeal Citizens United. That's far, far more resistance to corporate/wealthy interests than you're going to get from Trump
She did provide an end game on the middle east. Defeat ISIS. I agree that that vowing to root out the terrorist threat IN TIME is like deja vu, and I would also like to see us out of that part of the world, but her plans sounds like something concocted by Mother Theresa compared "torture them, go after their families, and then do a lot of other stuff that I won't talk about because a real leader doesn't reveal any of his plans but trust me, they'll be gone fast."
She is a troubled candidate, but her record shows that she's in agreement with Green party platform more often than not. I don't see how not voting for her is even an option, given what happens to your pure, Green agenda if Trump wins.
This video talks about "seat fillers" who sat in the Bernie delegate sections.
Here is one guy admitting on camera that he is a "seat filler". Just 38 secs...
Hillary just lost this election. Bet on it.
Boots on the ground in Philly wrote:
This will never be reported by the mainstream media, but the DNC installed white noise machines in the California delegate section to quiet the Bernie supporters. Here is a video from one of the CA delegates.
https://youtu.be/_i4Z7Wcd6NwMore proof that the Democrat party is more fractured than the public realizes..
Don't eff with Hillary and the DNC. We'll just drown out your Freedom with white noise and "reserved" signs. The free speech zone is outside.
She's already improving on Cheney's level of demagoguery.