Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Now with Bernie in the race, the Democrats have gone hard left & full on socialist. At this point, they don't even have a merely liberal candidate running much less a moderate one.

I have news for you Democrats. Try as you might, America will NEVER be a Socialist nation. America will NOT elect a Socialist POTUS in 2020.

Klobuchar has the moderate lane all to herself right now. Beto could join her, along with Biden.

I'm amazed that you've found Dem candidates for president advocating for the government takeover of the means of production. Could you link to that for me? We all need to see that.

Looser, Trump wrote:

Trump LOSES again!

Only 36% of Americans approve of Trump's fake national emergency.

https://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695720851/poll-6-in-10-disapprove-of-trumps-declaration-of-a-national-emergency

NPR is a far left news outlet and Clownpole certified. Not credible.

Democrat “men” can’t wait to vote for another shrill, cackling hillary clone.

Hahahahahaha!!!!!

The democrat candidates are completely out of touch with the American people.

Democrats lose again!!!!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Rasmussen is a far right poll service and is only Trumpette certified. Incredible.

^ True

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Now with Bernie in the race, the Democrats have gone hard left & full on socialist. At this point, they don't even have a merely liberal candidate running much less a moderate one.

I have news for you Democrats. Try as you might, America will NEVER be a Socialist nation. America will NOT elect a Socialist POTUS in 2020.

Well, between his tariffs, his subsidy to the farmers and his attempt to force electric grid operators to purchase power from obsolete coal plants, we may already have a socialist POTUS. Or at least one who isn't a big believer in free market capitalism.

This president takes ACTION wrote:

Thank GOD we actually have a president now that takes ACTION. No more talk, sound good, and do nothing president.

Well, I suspect this post is a poe, but on the off chance that it's serious: Why did this president wait for two years? Why didn't he take ACTION when his party had majorities in both houses of Congress? Goodness knows, he/they weren't doing much else at the time...

Could it be because his re-election campaign was not imminent back then, and it is now?

Or could it just be because he's massively incompetent--at doing stuff himself, and at hiring people who can do things?

.

.

.

.

.

.

Anyway--and not that anyone cares (I barely do myself)--I and all my aliases will now be taking a vacation from this thread. Have lots of work to do. I'm sure I can come back in a month or two and still read most of the same stuff. Have fun, gang.

johnny99 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Now with Bernie in the race, the Democrats have gone hard left & full on socialist. At this point, they don't even have a merely liberal candidate running much less a moderate one.

I have news for you Democrats. Try as you might, America will NEVER be a Socialist nation. America will NOT elect a Socialist POTUS in 2020.

Well, between his tariffs, his subsidy to the farmers and his attempt to force electric grid operators to purchase power from obsolete coal plants, we may already have a socialist POTUS. Or at least one who isn't a big believer in free market capitalism.

Trump’s actions cannot be criticized, remember.

You will never get an answer, only whataboutisms

Trump is the Saudi's b!tch. Trumps supporters are his b!tches, all the while Trump and his family are only interested in increasing their bank accounts and stroking their fragile egos.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47296641

This president takes ACTION wrote:

agip wrote:

if we have an emergency now, how did the country must have really had a terrible time after 1990, when illegal immigration was 4x higher than now. I mean there must have been rising crime, economic crises....oh wait, I'm hearing the 1990s were a time of mass prosperity and falling crime.

This is completely illogical. So because something was a bigger problem a few years ago, it's not a problem today? Changes still need to be made, that is clear. Building a wall is PART of that plan. It's not that difficult to understand.

Thank GOD we actually have a president now that takes ACTION. No more talk, sound good, and do nothing president.

Nope. Why should messing with the current wall be part of that plan? Trump has not clarified why any wall plan would be effective? He has not sold that beyond just declaring so. So you want someone who does but doesn’t think? That’s even worse.

With that said I do think there is much to do and obviously we do have an immigration management issue that needs solution. I do not believe that wall is a solution, let alone a cost-effective one. A majority of Americans agree with me.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Now with Bernie in the race, the Democrats have gone hard left & full on socialist. At this point, they don't even have a merely liberal candidate running much less a moderate one.

I have news for you Democrats. Try as you might, America will NEVER be a Socialist nation. America will NOT elect a Socialist POTUS in 2020.

Klobuchar has the moderate lane all to herself right now. Beto could join her, along with Biden.

I'm amazed that you've found Dem candidates for president advocating for the government takeover of the means of production. Could you link to that for me? We all need to see that.

Be a Capitalist, find it youself and do your own work.

Ciro wrote:

Trump is the Saudi's b!tch. Trumps supporters are his b!tches, all the while Trump and his family are only interested in increasing their bank accounts and stroking their fragile egos.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47296641

Of course, did you expect anything other than backroom dealinf to enrich himself and his business interests? Why else would he have been so keen on nepotism?

MBS clearly did him a huge favor flooding the oil market with more supply to drop prices leading to the midterms. Favors like this aren’t cheap. In return, weapons deals and public appeasement that cost us our credibility and put our national security at risk.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Klobuchar has the moderate lane all to herself right now. Beto could join her, along with Biden.

I'm amazed that you've found Dem candidates for president advocating for the government takeover of the means of production. Could you link to that for me? We all need to see that.

Be a Capitalist, find it youself and do your own work.

ok I looked and couldn't find it

so I'll conclude that you are a lying liar who lies every day and twice on Sunday.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Klobuchar has the moderate lane all to herself right now. Beto could join her, along with Biden.

I'm amazed that you've found Dem candidates for president advocating for the government takeover of the means of production. Could you link to that for me? We all need to see that.

Be a Capitalist, find it youself and do your own work.

How’s that kool aid? It’s been pointed out before, but while you preach to us you don’t even know the difference between capitalism and socialism. Throwing out random nationalist ramblings doesn’t make you look smarter or patriotic, it makes you look like a stooge.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Klobuchar has the moderate lane all to herself right now. Beto could join her, along with Biden.

I'm amazed that you've found Dem candidates for president advocating for the government takeover of the means of production. Could you link to that for me? We all need to see that.

Be a Capitalist, find it youself and do your own work.

In other words ... your post is a nothingburger.

Trollminator wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Trump is the Saudi's b!tch. Trumps supporters are his b!tches, all the while Trump and his family are only interested in increasing their bank accounts and stroking their fragile egos.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47296641

Of course, did you expect anything other than backroom dealinf to enrich himself and his business interests? Why else would he have been so keen on nepotism?

MBS clearly did him a huge favor flooding the oil market with more supply to drop prices leading to the midterms. Favors like this aren’t cheap. In return, weapons deals and public appeasement that cost us our credibility and put our national security at risk.

As long as drops the odd bigoted sound byte his followers think he's one of them ?

I give him credit for realizing just how naive the electorate are.

Ciro wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Of course, did you expect anything other than backroom dealinf to enrich himself and his business interests? Why else would he have been so keen on nepotism?

MBS clearly did him a huge favor flooding the oil market with more supply to drop prices leading to the midterms. Favors like this aren’t cheap. In return, weapons deals and public appeasement that cost us our credibility and put our national security at risk.

As long as drops the odd bigoted sound byte his followers think he's one of them ?

I give him credit for realizing just how naive the electorate are.

Due to his stupidity, his ability to connect with the common folk (aka mouth breathers) continues to be underestimated. What does that say about those people? Either extremely stupid or riddled with pent up white anxiety and looking for scapegoat. I give him credit for that too, but he doesn’t have any other hands to play so he will lose.

new investigation on how Trump has never stopped trying to stop the investigations on him.

I'm pretty sure that Mueller will inform the AG that he thinks Trump obstructed justice. This sh7t ain't funny anymore.

What a disgusting unamerican we have for a president. And 90% of the GOP likes it that way.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/19/us/politics/trump-investigations.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Fat hurts wrote:

Dems don't understand Americans wrote:

I don't think the dems do agree that it's a problem. You have Beto saying he would like to tear walls down. you had Pelosi saying she wouldn't give one dollar for a wall. (then caved).....hardly in agreement. the dem party is a dumpster fire with no leadership and they stand for nothing important to Americans.

Dems do agree it's a problem. They just don't agree that walls are a solution. And it's obviously not an emergency.

You're obviously wrong.