Alan Dershowitz, Ronny Jackson and Turley have discovered they can make good money pretending to be unbiased or even at one time progressive yet speaking on Fox News 20 times a week doing Trumps boot licking. They have been doing it for years on everything Trump related.
This doesn’t just happen on the right. Michael Cohen admitted he was making half a million a year bashing Trump
My point is that none of these guys should be used as unbiased anything anymore.
Yet people cite Dershowitz and Turley every week as “leftists legal scholars” that say Trump is innocent. They are paid hacks.
I’ll guess Trump’s fellow Jeffrey Epstein buddy, Allen Dershowitz.
Correct! Registered Democrat, 49 year Harvard law professor and Obama voter Alan Dershowitz.
Dershowitz also emphatically said on many occasions that the evidence at the O. J. Simpson trial showed Simpson was framed for murder by the LAPD. He repeated that idiocy many times long after the Simpson trial was over. Dershowitz is a great legal scholar on various Constitutional issues, but as analyst of trial evidence, he's obviously as confused as AdultintheRoom.
I'll never understand posts like these in general -- "Look! Here's what this other guy said, so I must be right about something that I haven't even really expressed and know little about . . ." How does it matter to you what Dershowitz said about the Trump hush-porn trial? Has Marcia Clark said anything about this? What about Gloria Allred? Kid Rock? We need to know. More importantly here on this message board, do YOU yourself have an informed opinion of your own on the evidence presented, or is your function here just to relay brief messages about it from celebrities?
Alan Dershowitz, Ronny Jackson and Turley have discovered they can make good money pretending to be unbiased or even at one time progressive yet speaking on Fox News 20 times a week doing Trumps boot licking. They have been doing it for years on everything Trump related.
This doesn’t just happen on the right. Michael Cohen admitted he was making half a million a year bashing Trump
My point is that none of these guys should be used as unbiased anything anymore.
Yet people cite Dershowitz and Turley every week as “leftists legal scholars” that say Trump is innocent. They are paid hacks.
Difference with Cohen, is that he admits to being biased. He was loyal to Donald and then Donald threw him under the bus. Cohen speaks the truth about Donald while admitting that he hates Donald Von Shizzenpants.
Correct! Registered Democrat, 49 year Harvard law professor and Obama voter Alan Dershowitz.
Dershowitz also emphatically said on many occasions that the evidence at the O. J. Simpson trial showed Simpson was framed for murder by the LAPD. He repeated that idiocy many times long after the Simpson trial was over. Dershowitz is a great legal scholar on various Constitutional issues, but as analyst of trial evidence, he's obviously as confused as AdultintheRoom.
I'll never understand posts like these in general -- "Look! Here's what this other guy said, so I must be right about something that I haven't even really expressed and know little about . . ." How does it matter to you what Dershowitz said about the Trump hush-porn trial? Has Marcia Clark said anything about this? What about Gloria Allred? Kid Rock? We need to know. More importantly here on this message board, do YOU yourself have an informed opinion of your own on the evidence presented, or is your function here just to relay brief messages about it from celebrities?
The LAPD literally planted evidence and got caught. You think you know more about the trial than one of the lawyers??
The ego on your lefties is baffling. You're like turds who think you're all diamonds.
And yes I will defer to legal scholars on matters of law because I'm not a f*cking idiot.
The legal analysts on CNN agree with Dershowitz. A more intelligent person would wonder why even TDS riddled CNN disagreed with them.
Dershowitz and Epstein are both lifelong Democrats.
Downvoting reality. Typical cultist behavior.
dershowitz hasn't donated to a major dem campaign since 2012 (roughly around when he left harvard), opposed impeaching trump and was on his defense team, lives on fox these days.
Alan Dershowitz, Ronny Jackson and Turley have discovered they can make good money pretending to be unbiased or even at one time progressive yet speaking on Fox News 20 times a week doing Trumps boot licking. They have been doing it for years on everything Trump related.
This doesn’t just happen on the right. Michael Cohen admitted he was making half a million a year bashing Trump
My point is that none of these guys should be used as unbiased anything anymore.
Yet people cite Dershowitz and Turley every week as “leftists legal scholars” that say Trump is innocent. They are paid hacks.
Difference with Cohen, is that he admits to being biased. He was loyal to Donald and then Donald threw him under the bus. Cohen speaks the truth about Donald while admitting that he hates Donald Von Shizzenpants.
Meanwhile, Cohen's own testimony and behavior proved Cohen was never loyal to anyone but Cohen.
Cohen got arrested by the corrupt Democrats hoping he would flip on Trump. Little did the corrupt Democrats realize Cohen didn't have anything on Trump.
There's a reason there was ZERO evidence of any crime presented in this sham trial. Cohen had NOTHING and there was no crime.
dershowitz hasn't donated to a major dem campaign since 2012 (roughly around when he left harvard), opposed impeaching trump and was on his defense team, lives on fox these days.
He voted for Biden in 2020. He's a Democrat. He's just not corrupt so he won't lie about the law to support his political party.
re cohen, he already went to jail after pleading guilty to the stormy payoff campaign finance angle. given that, i was surprised the boss wasn't indicted the day he left office -- and by the same feds who went after cohen. if 2 guys are in a room and agree to do something illegal, and one serves a prison term like it was real....?
if it never happened and was all to frame the boss, a guilty plea is pretty freaking stupid. dude went to prison for months, has a family.
Difference with Cohen, is that he admits to being biased. He was loyal to Donald and then Donald threw him under the bus. Cohen speaks the truth about Donald while admitting that he hates Donald Von Shizzenpants.
Meanwhile, Cohen's own testimony and behavior proved Cohen was never loyal to anyone but Cohen.
Cohen got arrested by the corrupt Democrats hoping he would flip on Trump. Little did the corrupt Democrats realize Cohen didn't have anything on Trump.
There's a reason there was ZERO evidence of any crime presented in this sham trial. Cohen had NOTHING and there was no crime.
Mmmno back when Cohen was convicted, the judge remarked that Donald could also be charged.
NEW YORK (AP) — Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer and fixer, pleaded guilty Tuesday to campaign-finance violations and other charges, saying Trump directed him to arrange the payment of hush money...
dershowitz hasn't donated to a major dem campaign since 2012 (roughly around when he left harvard), opposed impeaching trump and was on his defense team, lives on fox these days.
He voted for Biden in 2020. He's a Democrat. He's just not corrupt so he won't lie about the law to support his political party.
he refused to rule out voting for trump this year based on the israel business. you're straining very hard. the man is drifting.
telling -- he gave to hillary against obama. he didn't give to hillary against trump. the man is drifting.
wtf "legal analysis." both john edwards and cohen have been charged with campaign finance crimes for using campaign funds to hide affairs. trump is getting equal treatment, not special treatment. your party is deeply confused on that. if you don't seem to know where the lines are anymore, but think politics or position should be a bailout, that isn't a double standard, that's saying powerful people like OJ and weinstein who can afford dershowitz or the like, get to play by other rules than the rest of us.
btw, dershowitz is a defense attorney. factor that into assuming he's being objective rather than backing his former client like he still works for him.
Correct! Registered Democrat, 49 year Harvard law professor and Obama voter Alan Dershowitz.
Dershowitz also emphatically said on many occasions that the evidence at the O. J. Simpson trial showed Simpson was framed for murder by the LAPD. He repeated that idiocy many times long after the Simpson trial was over. Dershowitz is a great legal scholar on various Constitutional issues, but as analyst of trial evidence, he's obviously as confused as AdultintheRoom.
I'll never understand posts like these in general -- "Look! Here's what this other guy said, so I must be right about something that I haven't even really expressed and know little about . . ." How does it matter to you what Dershowitz said about the Trump hush-porn trial? Has Marcia Clark said anything about this? What about Gloria Allred? Kid Rock? We need to know. More importantly here on this message board, do YOU yourself have an informed opinion of your own on the evidence presented, or is your function here just to relay brief messages about it from celebrities?
Dersh is like every other legal scholar. They make their living through mental masturbation. They say absolutely nothing with as many words possible.
Idiots like Winston/Adolt pick up little crumbs, from the word salad and declare victory. What a maroon.
He voted for Biden in 2020. He's a Democrat. He's just not corrupt so he won't lie about the law to support his political party.
he refused to rule out voting for trump this year based on the israel business. you're straining very hard. the man is drifting.
telling -- he gave to hillary against obama. he didn't give to hillary against trump. the man is drifting.
wtf "legal analysis." both john edwards and cohen have been charged with campaign finance crimes for using campaign funds to hide affairs. trump is getting equal treatment, not special treatment. your party is deeply confused on that. if you don't seem to know where the lines are anymore, but think politics or position should be a bailout, that isn't a double standard, that's saying powerful people like OJ and weinstein who can afford dershowitz or the like, get to play by other rules than the rest of us.
btw, dershowitz is a defense attorney. factor that into assuming he's being objective rather than backing his former client like he still works for him.
You thinking a Jew saying he won't vote for a pro-Hamas president is only doing so because he secretly likes Trump is "straining very hard".
Edward's case got dropped for a reason.
Cohen's case was literally only brought to get him to flip on Trump. When he didn't have anything on Trump they threatened to put his wife in prison for his own personal tax crimes so he agreed to invent a crime with the prosecutors.
Meanwhile, Cohen's own testimony and behavior proved Cohen was never loyal to anyone but Cohen.
Cohen got arrested by the corrupt Democrats hoping he would flip on Trump. Little did the corrupt Democrats realize Cohen didn't have anything on Trump.
There's a reason there was ZERO evidence of any crime presented in this sham trial. Cohen had NOTHING and there was no crime.
Mmmno back when Cohen was convicted, the judge remarked that Donald could also be charged.
and the DOJ guidelines are trash anyway. the constitution doesn't say the man is immune, nor does it say he cannot be tried in office. the whole idea is we were breaking with kings and divine right. agnew got convicted and had to quit. why is a president any different.
the theory doesn't work in practice anyway. the idea is supposed to be that dealing with criminal charges would disrupt the executive. the man spent most of the second half of his term fending off special counsel and impeachments. wishing the president didn't have a problem and could concentrate doesn't make the stories or investigations go away. you know what does deal with the issue? turning up the heat. nixon finally just up and left. but we lack the morality of that era, any sense of shame.
