Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

TroLLminator wrote:

He is until he says something you don't like. I also noticed he seems to have switched his emplo... I mean allegiances recently. He was a constant figure on CNN and now he's on FOX a lot. Everyone has a price.

It is simply not true that "everyone has a price".

Please stop lying.

DFF detector wrote:

TroLLminator wrote:

I don't buy that. It took 6 months? It's not like he stepped up his insanity the last couple of weeks

DFF was arrested over the weekend at the Reno airport after a racist tirade. True story.

He doesn't currently have internet access whil incarcerated....but he'll be back, trust me. Evidently his real name is Michael and he's a disabled vet.

Thank you for your service DFF/Michael.😘😘😘😘🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇱🇷🇱🇷

You mean he's not at a 500 hr long "H20 polo" competition?

This Manly Man wrote:

TroLLminator wrote:

He is until he says something you don't like. I also noticed he seems to have switched his emplo... I mean allegiances recently. He was a constant figure on CNN and now he's on FOX a lot. Everyone has a price.

It is simply not true that "everyone has a price".

Please stop lying.

Let me guess, except for Jesus? Don't be a butthole, you know what I meant

TroLLminator wrote:

This Manly Man wrote:

It is simply not true that "everyone has a price".

Please stop lying.

Let me guess, except for Jesus? Don't be a butthole, you know what I meant

Bad guess.

There are many men of integrity. Certainly they are in the minority but to infer that only Jesus did not have a price is to show a startling lack of understanding of the human condition.

Oh yeah, and don't be a butthole.

Oh, one more thing - please stop lying.

eric a blair wrote:

trumper,

what is your explanation of Trump:

1) asking comey for an oath of personal loyalty

2) asking comey to go easy on the russia investigation

3) firing Comey, and then saying he fired comey because of the russia investigation.

that's an easy one. see what you can do with it.

None of these are true. Some are from anonymous sources and exaggerations.

itbaddude wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

trumper,

what is your explanation of Trump:

1) asking comey for an oath of personal loyalty

2) asking comey to go easy on the russia investigation

3) firing Comey, and then saying he fired comey because of the russia investigation.

that's an easy one. see what you can do with it.

None of these are true. Some are from anonymous sources and exaggerations.

Agreed. The first two are total fake news, and the third was Trump firing a guy he didn't trust to be running the FBI. Trump didn't collude with the Russians, so he doesn't see the firing as suspicious.

It was great to see the Left suddenly love and have great respect for Comey. Weeks earlier they hated him. The Colbert show audience reaction of joy when he broke the news that night was priceless. It totally ruined his monologue flow and he had to literally explain to them why they need to now be outraged at the firing of the guy that they were told was the reason Hillary lost the election.

This Manly Man wrote:

TroLLminator wrote:

Let me guess, except for Jesus? Don't be a butthole, you know what I meant

Bad guess.

There are many men of integrity. Certainly they are in the minority but to infer that only Jesus did not have a price is to show a startling lack of understanding of the human condition.

Oh yeah, and don't be a butthole.

Oh, one more thing - please stop lying.

The troll void fills up quickly here doesn't it

bigtime wrote:

https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/cbo-releases-estimates-obamacare-repeal-203400390.html

Life is a delicate balance. The best you can hope for is to maximize health and happiness.

For a more complete picture:

*Reduction of deficits*

CBO and JCT estimate that enacting the American Health Care Act would reduce federal deficits by $119 billion over the coming decade and increase the number of people who are uninsured by 23 million in 2026 relative to current law.

*Uncertainty Surrounding the Estimates*

The ways in which federal agencies, states, insurers, employers, individuals, doctors, hospitals, and other affected parties would respond to the changes made by the legislation are all difficult to predict, so the estimates discussed in this document are uncertain. In particular, states would have a wide range of options—notably, the optional waivers discussed above that would allow them to modify the minimum set of benefits that must be provided by insurance sold in the nongroup and small-group markets and that would permit medical underwriting for people who did not demonstrate continuous coverage. The array of market regulations that states could implement makes estimating the outcomes especially uncertain. But, throughout, CBO and JCT have endeavored to develop estimates that are in the middle of the distribution of potential outcomes.

TroLLminator wrote:

This Manly Man wrote:

Bad guess.

There are many men of integrity. Certainly they are in the minority but to infer that only Jesus did not have a price is to show a startling lack of understanding of the human condition.

Oh yeah, and don't be a butthole.

Oh, one more thing - please stop lying.

The troll void fills up quickly here doesn't it

Show some integrity and please cease your posting.

Thanks

I'm so tired of reading the Americans whine and moan about losing the election.

If the Russians had lost, they wouldn't be whining or moaning or protesting or calling for impeachment; they'd be diligently working out better systems to ensure they win the next one.

The Americans need to man up and be more like the Russians.

I fixed it for you. It was wonderful to watch the Republicans love Come for bringing down Hillary, and have The Donald talk about how wonderful he was. And then have Donnie can him the second he was about to reveal the ties to Russia.

While meanwhile, the Republicans went from talking about him like it was the greatest thing since sliced bread, to the worst person since Hillary.

observver wrote:

I'm so tired of reading the Americans whine and moan about losing the election.

If the Russians had lost, they wouldn't be whining or moaning or protesting or calling for impeachment; they'd be diligently working out better systems to ensure they win the next one.

The Americans need to man up and be more like the Russians.

Russians are among the biggest losers, nastiest, most miserable human beings on Earth. Not sure it's such a great idea to emulate them.

Um...yes it does. Read it again. I will pull out the important part for you - "illegal cooperation or conspiracy". ILLEGAL, brother.

Flagpole wrote:

This Manly Man wrote:

The definition that you provided: "secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others" does NOT support the claim that you are making: "Collusion by definition is a crime".

Um...yes it does. Read it again. I will pull out the important part for you - "illegal cooperation or conspiracy". ILLEGAL, brother.

You're kidding, right? Trying to be funny.

What part of "or" are you having a hard time understanding? Is it the "o" or the "r"?

4920

Trumpettes are NOT Americans!

This Manly Man wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Um...yes it does. Read it again. I will pull out the important part for you - "illegal cooperation or conspiracy". ILLEGAL, brother.

You're kidding, right? Trying to be funny.

What part of "or" are you having a hard time understanding? Is it the "o" or the "r"?

"in order to cheat or deceive others". Cheating others is a crime.

The "or" is simply there to say that it COULD be in secret or not. You can do illegal things right out in the open.

And, if you don't like that definition to show that collusion is a crime (because it IS a crime by definition), then how about this one:

"An agreement between two or more people to defraud a person of his or her rights or to obtain something that is prohibited by law."

Or this one:

"where two persons (or business entities through their officers or other employees) enter into a deceitful agreement, usually secret, to defraud and/or gain an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or those with whom they are negotiating. Collusion can include secret price or wage fixing, secret rebates, or pretending to be independent of each other when actually conspiring together for their joint ends. It can range from small-town shopkeepers or heirs to a grandma's estate, to gigantic electronics companies or big league baseball team owners. (See: fraud)"

Collusion is a crime.

1100 wrote:

Trumpettes are NOT Americans!

So proud

Flagpole wrote:

This Manly Man wrote:

You're kidding, right? Trying to be funny.

What part of "or" are you having a hard time understanding? Is it the "o" or the "r"?

"in order to cheat or deceive others". Cheating others is a crime.

The "or" is simply there to say that it COULD be in secret or not. You can do illegal things right out in the open.

And, since I am starting to realize that my position is simply insupportable I think that I should try to change the subject by trying a new definition. Who knows, maybe 'This Manly Man' will bite and let me off the hook.

Jeez, this is fun.

Of course we don't even need to go on to the next one since the first "or" does the trick.

Let us be clear that "or" means one OR the other condition holds (and possibly both but not necessarily both).

So, the "cooperation or conspiracy" could be secret OR it could be illegal (or possibly but not necessarily both). Of course I know that you realize your error at this point but being our beloved Flaggy you are incapable of simply admitting error (seriously, take a lesson from your friend agip - he's great at admitting when he makes a mistake).

But what is funny (possibly on purpose - trying to give you credit here) is that your next line of defense suffers from the exact same error.

"In order to cheat OR deceive others" Note again that pesky "or". Is it illegal to deceive others? So, every time anyone tells a lie they are breaking the law? Dang, we should ALL be in jail!

Sorry brother, but you haven't any ground to stand on.