DJT indicted on four counts related to January 6

RossiCheated wrote:

Here's a good article explaining why Exhibit 35 proves the case against Trump and really is the "smoking gun" that juries look for to get to "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Will the M^GA crowd read this? No. They will hide behind their claims of a "partisan attack" and "conflicted judge" and "democrat jury."

But the Trump team recorded the crime, all on one piece of paper.

As the author explains, getting this evidence had to be the "Holy S$!t!" moment for the prosecution. I think this could be where the defense wishes there weren't lawyers on the jury because surely they will understand how important this exhibit is.

Link:www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-h...

poosmacker wrote:

Can one of you very smart Always Trumpers explain the meaning behind the balloon art?

joedlrtx wrote:

The prosecution’s star witness has already admitted to lying and stole from the Trump organization. It’s a wonder the feds never brought this case.

joedlrtx wrote:

The prosecution’s star witness has already admitted to lying and stole from the Trump organization. It’s a wonder the feds never brought this case.

Ronald Dump wrote:

joedlrtx wrote:

The prosecution’s star witness has already admitted to lying and stole from the Trump organization. It’s a wonder the feds never brought this case.

Correct about the first sentence. Incorrect about the second sentence. Despite the witness admitting to lying, if the prosecution has documents and other evidence which back up what the witness is testifying to, then Trump is in trouble legally.

The entire showboating of Trump's lawyer has been to prove something everyone acknowledges and as a distraction to what the corroborating evidence either is or may be.

WinstonSmith wrote:

Ronald Dump wrote:

Correct about the first sentence. Incorrect about the second sentence. Despite the witness admitting to lying, if the prosecution has documents and other evidence which back up what the witness is testifying to, then Trump is in trouble legally.

The entire showboating of Trump's lawyer has been to prove something everyone acknowledges and as a distraction to what the corroborating evidence either is or may be.

Only problem with your fantasy is that the prosecution has absolutely zero evidence of any kind other than Cohen's worthless word.

Ronald Dump wrote:

WinstonSmith wrote:

Only problem with your fantasy is that the prosecution has absolutely zero evidence of any kind other than Cohen's worthless word.

So you haven't paid attention to the case. Thanks.

Ronald Dump wrote:

WinstonSmith wrote:

Only problem with your fantasy is that the prosecution has absolutely zero evidence of any kind other than Cohen's worthless word.

So you haven't paid attention to the case. Thanks.

king999 wrote:

Ronald Dump wrote:

So you haven't paid attention to the case. Thanks.

Most of you are not following along at all, there is zero chance of conviction here, and is just a tactic, it's not just Republicans saying so, either. There is no crime.

Commode Flusher wrote:

joedlrtx wrote:

When he is lying about something pertinent to the case at hand, it doesn’t help.

Agreed. But that is much different than your original point.

Also, I'm not sure Cohen has been shown to have lied on the stand. Are you talking about the Cohen testimony about the October 24, 2016 call to Schiller? It's hard to tell if the jury will think Cohen was lying about that and, if so, how much it matters. The Cohen Q&A with Blanche wasn't as impeaching and spectacular as the media was reporting. Just my semi-informed opinion from the excerpts I read.

king999 wrote:

Ronald Dump wrote:

So you haven't paid attention to the case. Thanks.

Most of you are not following along at all, there is zero chance of conviction here, and is just a tactic, it's not just Republicans saying so, either. There is no crime.

Commode Flusher wrote:

king999 wrote:

Most of you are not following along at all, there is zero chance of conviction here, and is just a tactic, it's not just Republicans saying so, either. There is no crime.

Yeah! Damn straight!

Prosecution has rested. Wow. Case is moving along. What's this sh!t about the defense resting today too? Trump HAS to take the stand! Time for Trump to grab his balls and man up. Trump is the only one who can sufficiently explain all this sleazy criminal sh!t.

RossiCheated wrote:

Here's a good article explaining why Exhibit 35 proves the case against Trump and really is the "smoking gun" that juries look for to get to "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Will the M^GA crowd read this? No. They will hide behind their claims of a "partisan attack" and "conflicted judge" and "democrat jury."

But the Trump team recorded the crime, all on one piece of paper.

As the author explains, getting this evidence had to be the "Holy S$!t!" moment for the prosecution. I think this could be where the defense wishes there weren't lawyers on the jury because surely they will understand how important this exhibit is.

Link:www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-h...