CONspriacy wrote:
spellcheck bruh wrote:
QUADRUPLING down on your ignorance.
Fix the spelling of your name, for Christ's sake.
spellcheck bruh is incorrect. Try
spellcheck, bruh
Wrong. I'm the spellcheck bruh. Nothing formal about it, either.
Nice try. Anything on Russia today?
You so silly.
spellcheck bruh wrote:
CONspriacy wrote:
Fix the spelling of your name, for Christ's sake.
spellcheck bruh is incorrect. Try
spellcheck, bruh
Wrong. I'm the spellcheck bruh. Nothing formal about it, either.
Nice try. Anything on Russia today?
You so silly.
You’re so silly, bruh.
Fetus does not = infant wrote:
Global Warming denier wrote:
Amazing .... you Liberals have no problem with the governor endorsing infanticide (and that is what he did) and offered no protest, but when it comes out he dressed in a klan outfit 30 years ago, all of your panties are in a bunch. Again, you are fine with infanticide but whine when he did something stupid 30 years ago. Makes me sick.
An infant is defined as a child from 2 months post live birth - 1 year old. Medical definition of fetus and infant here...
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/5/e20160551I am not aware of any lib calling to kill infants (properly defined as a child from 2 months post live birth to 1 year old). Are you?
... but here is Trump saying we should specifically target our enemies families which presumably includes innocent children in the age range of an infant.
Why are you lying?
A baby born is not an infant until 2 months after birth?!? Seriously, that is such a weird lie.
Not that it should matter, but even the source you provide says no such thing.
Weird
PIO!!! wrote:
Fetus does not = infant wrote:
An infant is defined as a child from 2 months post live birth - 1 year old. Medical definition of fetus and infant here...
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/5/e20160551I am not aware of any lib calling to kill infants (properly defined as a child from 2 months post live birth to 1 year old). Are you?
... but here is Trump saying we should specifically target our enemies families which presumably includes innocent children in the age range of an infant.
Why are you lying?
A baby born is not an infant until 2 months after birth?!? Seriously, that is such a weird lie.
Not that it should matter, but even the source you provide says no such thing.
Weird
You are right, the poster mid-quoted the referenced article which says....
“A live birth that results in death within the first year (
a funny story wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Not true. Unfortunately I can not prove it because they removed the thread...so technically, you can'g prove I said what you said I said either...except that I have integrity and admit I did.
I said that Trump had ZERO chance of winning unless he or his campaign cheated in order to make it happen or aliens from space didn't come down here and make us all vote for him. I just didn't say it every time, because that's a mouthful. Logically speaking, even if I DIDN'T say that (but I did), a cheater can't be declared a winner. We take away gold medals from athletes we find out later cheated. I also used that analogy more than once.
I have asked Wejo to replace the thread to no avail. Perhaps you can take up that cause and have the thread replaced. It will prove that what I say is true.
Dirt started to come out about Russia before the election anyway.
Funny thing is...in the 2+ years since you said it, no one has EVER corroborated your story. However, many people (including your pals) have come out to deny you ever said it.
I can corroborate FP's story. He did indeed include the caveats within his original guarantee that he claims he did.
PIO!!! wrote:
a funny story wrote:
Funny thing is...in the 2+ years since you said it, no one has EVER corroborated your story. However, many people (including your pals) have come out to deny you ever said it.
I can corroborate FP's story. He did indeed include the caveats within his original guarantee that he claims he did.
The only LRC troll who keeps a log of everything FP posts is HardLoper. So . . . . .
HI, HARDLOPER!!!
The Russia Collusion story always appeared contrived Sure seems like the fable is being exposed.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
The Russia Collusion story always appeared contrived Sure seems like the fable is being exposed.
No it does not. If you actually believe what you wrote above you have brain damage.
Fetus does not = infant wrote:
Global Warming denier wrote:
Amazing .... you Liberals have no problem with the governor endorsing infanticide (and that is what he did) and offered no protest, but when it comes out he dressed in a klan outfit 30 years ago, all of your panties are in a bunch. Again, you are fine with infanticide but whine when he did something stupid 30 years ago. Makes me sick.
Fetus does not = infant
Just an FYI, here is the Oxford English definition of infanticide...
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/infanticideAn infant is defined as a child from live birth - 1 year old. Medical definition of fetus and infant here...
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/5/e20160551I am not aware of any lib calling to kill infants (properly defined as a child from live birth to 1 year old).
... but here is Trump saying we should specifically target our enemies families which presumably includes innocent children in the age range of an infant.
http://time.com/4132368/donald-trump-isis-bombing/And here is Jeb Bush saying he’d kill a baby under certain circumstances. Admittedly, he doesn’t specifically say he’d kill a baby if it was an infant or if he’d wait until after its first birthday.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oFZoVIDx5dgOf course, there is also the fact that the majority of conservatives frequently call for increasing the number of infants born to poor women by restricting access to appropriate family planning options while simultaneously calling for slashing funding to programs that help poor children get adequate access to healthcare, good nutrition, and housing which, of course, all contribute to increased infant mortality in the US.
Very accurate.
.HardLoper wrote:
PIO!!! wrote:
I can corroborate FP's story. He did indeed include the caveats within his original guarantee that he claims he did.
The only LRC troll who keeps a log of everything FP posts is HardLoper. So . . . . .
HI, HARDLOPER!!!
Hardloper is not apt to defend Flagpole.
Please try to put on your thinking cap next time before posting.
PIO!!! wrote:
.HardLoper wrote:
The only LRC troll who keeps a log of everything FP posts is HardLoper. So . . . . .
HI, HARDLOPER!!!
Hardloper is not apt to defend Flagpole.
Please try to put on your thinking cap next time before posting.
I did not make that post.
STOP stealing my name, you ignorant troll, HardLoper.
Unregistered posters, get off of this thread!
PIO!!! wrote:
Unregistered posters, get off of this thread!
ENOUGH! Be gone, you idiot.
After seeing one questionable old, old yearbook picture, Nancy Pelosi takes less than a day to determine that Governor Northam must resign.
After two years of investigations that have lead to several indictments, convictions and guilty pleas by Trump associates including clear evidence of financial impropriety, Pelosi still needs some official Mueller report to take a vote on impeachment which only initiates a trial of Trump.
L L wrote:
After seeing one questionable old, old yearbook picture, Nancy Pelosi takes less than a day to determine that Governor Northam must resign.
After two years of investigations that have lead to several indictments, convictions and guilty pleas by Trump associates including clear evidence of financial impropriety, Pelosi still needs some official Mueller report to take a vote on impeachment which only initiates a trial of Trump.
It is a fair point you are making, but the difference of course is that Northam is just a governor, not the President of the United States. Have to be MUCH more careful and measured when considering removing the President. With regard toe Pelosi, she's playing for the home run, and that is to get Trump out of office...because he's a criminal and deserves it.
Mueller is coming. The SDNY is coming.
The clown is done.
"to", not "toe".
Flagpole wrote:
L L wrote:
After seeing one questionable old, old yearbook picture, Nancy Pelosi takes less than a day to determine that Governor Northam must resign.
After two years of investigations that have lead to several indictments, convictions and guilty pleas by Trump associates including clear evidence of financial impropriety, Pelosi still needs some official Mueller report to take a vote on impeachment which only initiates a trial of Trump.
It is a fair point you are making, but the difference of course is that Northam is just a governor, not the President of the United States. Have to be MUCH more careful and measured when considering removing the President. With regard toe Pelosi, she's playing for the home run, and that is to get Trump out of office...because he's a criminal and deserves it.
Trump will resign. That is Pelosi's end game. Why would he resign, and not fight it out to the end? Money.
If a president resigns they get a full pension, plus all the perks that come with that – paid for office and expenses, paid for staff, paid for medical, paid for secret service protection.
If a president is impeach they would lose the above benefits.
Flagpole wrote:
Think about it wrote:
Knowing that you're typically pretty heavily to the left, I respect your honesty here. But this is the new Social Justice Warrior world we live in. Typically, it will be passed off as not serious if the offender is a Dem. But this is pretty blatant and a shocking image.
Now, a reasonable person would at least look at it and say "ok- it's not like he did this yesterday" and "it's not like there's any other evidence of him being racist." So perhaps it was just a costume of very poor taste in a time when culture was far less sensitive to the feelings of non-whites. An apology with admittance of poor taste, and hopefully with other evidence of not being racist (policy positions?) is a reasonable resolution here.
Be honest with yourself though, the typical Dem playbook in the last 25 years has been to call every Republican racist. Imagine if a picture like this surfaced for any of them.
Republicans who continue to support Trump have done NOTHING to show that they aren't racist. I actually used to not think that Republicans were racist just as a matter of being Republican, but for those who still support Trump, I am convinced that they are.
Back to Northam...he should resign. 1984 seems like a long time ago for some of you, but it was clear to everyone at that time that blackface and dressing up as a Klansman was flat out wrong. Northam is now saying that photo is not of him, but he sure seemed sure earlier that it was of him. How could he be confused on that? I know that I didn't dress up like either of those in the photo in 1984 or ever. He has no credibility now saying that he's not in that photo.
No one is saying that this 59-year-old man can't have a job ever again, just that this type of racism doesn't belong with the governor of a state. I have to agree. We just can't look the other way on this kind of crap any more.
Good on Democrats who won't accept this behavior in their ranks as opposed to Republicans who defend Trump and Roy Moore and all kinds of other degenerates. Democrats were quick to tell Al Franken and John Conyers to resign. The righteous pendulum surely swings, but right now Republicans are on the wrong side of what is right.
Even the African-American and Latino Republicans who support Trump are racist?
You have gone batsh!t crazy.
L L wrote:
After seeing one questionable old, old yearbook picture, Nancy Pelosi takes less than a day to determine that Governor Northam must resign.
After two years of investigations that have lead to several indictments, convictions and guilty pleas by Trump associates including clear evidence of financial impropriety, Pelosi still needs some official Mueller report to take a vote on impeachment which only initiates a trial of Trump.
I like how Kamala Harris called for him to resign because "Leaders are called to a higher standard." Hmmmmmm.
L L wrote:
After seeing one questionable old, old yearbook picture, Nancy Pelosi takes less than a day to determine that Governor Northam must resign.
After two years of investigations that have lead to several indictments, convictions and guilty pleas by Trump associates including clear evidence of financial impropriety, Pelosi still needs some official Mueller report to take a vote on impeachment which only initiates a trial of Trump.
I'm sure if you asked Nancy if Individual-1 should resign, she would say "yes".
But asking her if we should start impeachment proceedings is a very different kind of question.