xPlane wrote:
Just say No wrote:
Why just not vote for him [Shultz] in the election? Isn't that the democratic way instead of trying to financially ruin him before he runs?
Explain how boycotting Starbucks would financially ruin someone who does not work there?
While you are at it, also explain my multiple bankruptcies failed to financially run Derp President Trump.
*financially RUIN*
Just say No wrote:
Yes.... yes... wrote:
Yes. Just like millions of people joining together and voting someone into office someone who doesn't belong there...
a boycott is the same thing as a vote....they are voting against him running as something other than a D..... you are just against this because you want Schultz to run as an indy to help Trump. if it hurt Trumps chances you'd be all for a boycott.
Why just not vote for him in the election? Isn't that the democratic way instead of trying to financially ruin him before he runs?
Financially ruin him? The guy is worth $3B and I doubt all if it is in Starbucks common stock and if this strike reduces sales by more than 5%, I would be surprised.
Neva Met wrote:
I met Cory back when I lived in NYC and..... wrote:
I met Cory about 10 years ago when I lived in NYC and he was the mayor of Newark. Great guy.
But, he has no chance in this election. I really like him and will vote for him if he is the Dem candidate but he did not come across well on TV during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.
You never met Cory Booker.
This is going to be the most enjoyable Presidential Race on the Dem side. Spartacus, Pocahantas, Kami, Bernie, so far. None will beat Trump in 2020.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Huh??? wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Nope. I just understand things that you do not. By asking me, "what did Starbucks do wrong to get boycotted?" he is asking me to defend the boycotting of Starbucks. I have no dog in this fight and so I don't plan to answer that it did something wrong or it didn't. My opinion stands as stated...a person can boycott any company for any reason. If it's a good reason, it might do some damage. If it's a bad reason, it likely won't. He asked me this question based on an assumption that I DID support a boycott specifically against Starbucks (I don't believe any answer to the contrary), and nothing I have said indicates that.
You’re reading too much into this. The guy even said your interpretation was wrong.
You are insane (and paranoid).
No worries. This guy has already shown that he has a reading comprehension deficiency as well as the inability to string together a coherent thought.
He likely has a mental issue or is under the influence of drugs. Perhaps both.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
This is going to be the most enjoyable Presidential Race on the Trumper side. The Orange Turd in 2020. will be in jail for insane clowns.
^ Fixed that 4U.
Yup, I think dems will be quiet tonight......
Northam and.......
Rosenstein told Trump he is not the subject of the Russia investigation........
Very quiet tonight.....
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Yup, I think dems will be quiet tonight......
Northam and.......
Rosenstein told Trump he is not the subject of the Russia investigation........
Very quiet tonight.....
Rosenstein told him he is not a target. And he's not. Until he is indicted.
Just say No wrote:
Yes.... yes... wrote:
Yes. Just like millions of people joining together and voting someone into office someone who doesn't belong there...
a boycott is the same thing as a vote....they are voting against him running as something other than a D..... you are just against this because you want Schultz to run as an indy to help Trump. if it hurt Trumps chances you'd be all for a boycott.
Why just not vote for him in the election? Isn't that the democratic way instead of trying to financially ruin him before he runs?
Or they could just boycott, if that's what they'd like to do.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Yup, I think dems will be quiet tonight......
Northam and.......
Rosenstein told Trump he is not the subject of the Russia investigation........
Very quiet tonight.....
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
No response.....very very quiet......
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Yup, I think dems will be quiet tonight......
Northam and.......
Rosenstein told Trump he is not the subject of the Russia investigation........
Very quiet tonight.....
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Yup, I think dems will be quiet tonight......
Northam and.......
Rosenstein told Trump he is not the subject of the Russia investigation........
Very quiet tonight.....
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
You mean FoxNews isn't talking about this? It's on all the other networks and websites.
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
No response to this.....I have not found anyone in the Meuller or Rosenstein camp denying this.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/1/donald-trump-says-rod-rosenstein-informed-his-lega/Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
He needs to go. His resignation would be a huge favor to Dems and the public.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
No response.....very very quiet......
I wouldn't be so froggy about the news of the day if I were you.
1) Because a Democrat does a bad thing means nothing at all when it comes to Trump and the investigations into him. Northam is hardly the first Democrat to do something they shouldn't have done, and he won't be the last. He should resign.
2) You are taking the word of Donald Trump, a serial liar and epic distorter of the truth that Rosenstein told him he was not a target. When did Rosenstein tell him that? Trump did not say. We DO know that Rosenstein told him that very early on in the investigation, but we don't know if that is still true or if Rosenstein told him that more recently or if the Mueller investigation knows that Trump will be considered a target eventually. There clearly is no reason for you Trumpers to celebrate here. You should not trust a single thing Trump says, and if you do, you are a fool.
With all the smoke around Trump...with all the facts that show he only hires criminals...with Stone already softening his stance on whether he will flip on Trump or not...there's no reason to celebrate for you Trumpers.
Mueller is coming. The SDNY is coming (stuff referred to them by Mueller, so Mueller still gets an assist there).
The clown is done.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
No response to this.....I have not found anyone in the Meuller or Rosenstein camp denying this.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/1/donald-trump-says-rod-rosenstein-informed-his-lega/
Do you pay attention at all to how this whole investigation is proceeding? With the exception of Mueller responding recently to the Buzzfeed article about Roger Stone and Trump, Mueller has been tight-lipped about everything. He and Rosenstein haven't made a habit of commenting to deny or affirm allegations. You can't hang your hat on that at all.
Trollminator wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
He needs to go. His resignation would be a huge favor to Dems and the public.
Agreed. The man was 25 when he did that, so he can't just claim youthful ignorance. We shouldn't tolerate that kind of behavior anymore.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I doubt if people are going to suffer through caffeine headaches if Shultz runs as an independent.
I don't agree that Shultz running as an independent would hand the election to Trump. If Schultz is polling at around 15%, people that hate Trump are likely to vote for the Democrat. The independent votes in 2016 were from people that hated both Hillary and Trump.
Shultz will probably pull from both centrist Dems and centrist Repubs. He'll lower the numbers for both major parties and may not have a net overall effect on the outcome of the election. I think the Dems completely overreacted to his potential candidacy.
TTH wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
You mean FoxNews isn't talking about this? It's on all the other networks and websites.
No, the libs on LR were not talking about it earlier.
The Fokus wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I doubt if people are going to suffer through caffeine headaches if Shultz runs as an independent.
I don't agree that Shultz running as an independent would hand the election to Trump. If Schultz is polling at around 15%, people that hate Trump are likely to vote for the Democrat. The independent votes in 2016 were from people that hated both Hillary and Trump.
Shultz will probably pull from both centrist Dems and centrist Repubs. He'll lower the numbers for both major parties and may not have a net overall effect on the outcome of the election. I think the Dems completely overreacted to his potential candidacy.
As have the republicans . . . overreacted. They believe that Shultz will only get democrats vote. But he will also get independents, AND republicans who cannot stand Trump. Not that Trumpers will believe that.