Sure looks like the former president is going to be locked up. Guess he sort of missed who he was screaming about all these years.
-
70
-
WinstonSmith wrote:
gramps wrote:
What are you even talking about? You have to lie about Biden to square away your undying support for Trump.
There's a huge difference between the two. Trump's transgressions are proven in court. Your statements about Biden are your looney speculations, nothing more.
You've lost your mind.
You live in a bubble.
Ashley Biden's diary is real. This is a fact that has been confirmed by the FBI, the courts, and Ashley Biden herself.
Tara Reade says Trump raped her according to E Jean Carroll's definition. Believe all women. You can't have it both ways.
You're insane. Nothing you've claimed has been confirmed. However, every single claim about Trump has been confirmed in court.
122 -
Trump's lawyers are screwing the pooch. They fell for the trap; trying to please Trump by asking aggressively questions suggesting that she made it all up and they never had sex.
The jury will interpret that as Trump's lies being forwarded by his lawyers, as if they are stupid.
Everyone on the planet believes they had sex.
102 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Trump's lawyers are screwing the pooch. They fell for the trap; trying to please Trump by asking aggressively questions suggesting that she made it all up and they never had sex.
The jury will interpret that as Trump's lies being forwarded by his lawyers, as if they are stupid.
Everyone on the planet believes they had sex.
At Trumps direction, the Trump attorneys may still use the “just the tip” defense.
60 -
Trump is a stain wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Trump's lawyers are screwing the pooch. They fell for the trap; trying to please Trump by asking aggressively questions suggesting that she made it all up and they never had sex.
The jury will interpret that as Trump's lies being forwarded by his lawyers, as if they are stupid.
Everyone on the planet believes they had sex.
At Trumps direction, the Trump attorneys may still use the “just the tip” defense.
He only had two inches to give.
80 -
2-incher wrote:
Trump is a stain wrote:
At Trumps direction, the Trump attorneys may still use the “just the tip” defense.
He only had two inches to give.
She said it never happened, is she saying something different now? sounds like she’s living the same dream you are.
010 -
While we have Winston , D Gary, and No Yankee; who needs Russian Trolls ?!?
110 -
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
40 -
slowerthanu wrote:
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
And why?
Because Jack Smith lied in court and the prosecution tampered with the evidence.
Jack Smith admitted in court that he mishandled the evidence.
Now we're left with a entirely political prosecutor who's mishandled classified material trying to prosecute a case about mishandling classified material.
This case might get thrown out completely.
115 -
slowerthanu wrote:
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
Here is the Order:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490069/530/united-states-v-trump/
Until now, I had never seen a judge putting together paragraphs of reasons attempting to justify why they can't do their job properly.
She sounds nuts to me. But who knows, maybe she is totally overwhelmed by the case and bizarrely decided to let the world know how stressed out she is. But you can't help but think that her now ADMITTED deliberate failure to set a trial date for a case that will have been filed more than a year ago before she ever sets one (if she ever even does set one) is really a deliberate obstruction of process. This thing was filed a fvcking year ago! It should be over by now. And she's saying a year later that she can't even figure out when the trial should start?!?! GTFO.
111 -
Commode Flusher wrote:
slowerthanu wrote:
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
Here is the Order:
Until now, I had never seen a judge putting together paragraphs of reasons attempting to justify why they can't do their job properly.
She sounds nuts to me. But who knows, maybe she is totally overwhelmed by the case and bizarrely decided to let the world know how stressed out she is. But you can't help but think that her now ADMITTED deliberate failure to set a trial date for a case that will have been filed more than a year ago before she ever sets one (if she ever even does set one) is really a deliberate obstruction of process. This thing was filed a fvcking year ago! It should be over by now. And she's saying a year later that she can't even figure out when the trial should start?!?! GTFO.
At some point, and maybe this is the point, she should know that she has done all she can to save him and she has placated his faithful followers (of which, she likely is one), and then the best thing is to get removed from the case altogether.
31 -
Commode Flusher wrote:
slowerthanu wrote:
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
Here is the Order:
Until now, I had never seen a judge putting together paragraphs of reasons attempting to justify why they can't do their job properly.
She sounds nuts to me. But who knows, maybe she is totally overwhelmed by the case and bizarrely decided to let the world know how stressed out she is. But you can't help but think that her now ADMITTED deliberate failure to set a trial date for a case that will have been filed more than a year ago before she ever sets one (if she ever even does set one) is really a deliberate obstruction of process. This thing was filed a fvcking year ago! It should be over by now. And she's saying a year later that she can't even figure out when the trial should start?!?! GTFO.
She'd be devastated to know the hobby jogger who probably works at Starbucks doesn't think she's doing her job well.
It's not her fault the government tried to seal all of the documents. It's not her fault unsealing them revealed that Smith lied in court and mishandled documents.
07 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Commode Flusher wrote:
Here is the Order:
Until now, I had never seen a judge putting together paragraphs of reasons attempting to justify why they can't do their job properly.
She sounds nuts to me. But who knows, maybe she is totally overwhelmed by the case and bizarrely decided to let the world know how stressed out she is. But you can't help but think that her now ADMITTED deliberate failure to set a trial date for a case that will have been filed more than a year ago before she ever sets one (if she ever even does set one) is really a deliberate obstruction of process. This thing was filed a fvcking year ago! It should be over by now. And she's saying a year later that she can't even figure out when the trial should start?!?! GTFO.
At some point, and maybe this is the point, she should know that she has done all she can to save him and she has placated his faithful followers (of which, she likely is one), and then the best thing is to get removed from the case altogether.
03 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Commode Flusher wrote:
Here is the Order:
Until now, I had never seen a judge putting together paragraphs of reasons attempting to justify why they can't do their job properly.
She sounds nuts to me. But who knows, maybe she is totally overwhelmed by the case and bizarrely decided to let the world know how stressed out she is. But you can't help but think that her now ADMITTED deliberate failure to set a trial date for a case that will have been filed more than a year ago before she ever sets one (if she ever even does set one) is really a deliberate obstruction of process. This thing was filed a fvcking year ago! It should be over by now. And she's saying a year later that she can't even figure out when the trial should start?!?! GTFO.
At some point, and maybe this is the point, she should know that she has done all she can to save him and she has placated his faithful followers (of which, she likely is one), and then the best thing is to get removed from the case altogether.
Anyone else—anyone—who stole national security documents, hid them, violated a subpoena to return them, lied to his own lawyers about them, obstructed the FBI search in getting them back as Trump did would have been tried, convicted and would be serving a multi year sentence in prison right now.
61 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
slowerthanu wrote:
Trump judge making sure the case goes nowhere:
And why?
Because Jack Smith lied in court and the prosecution tampered with the evidence.
Jack Smith admitted in court that he mishandled the evidence.
Now we're left with a entirely political prosecutor who's mishandled classified material trying to prosecute a case about mishandling classified material.
This case might get thrown out completely.
The case has been earmarked for delay for months....mostly because of the judge's hesitation. Not much at all to do with the alleged "bombshell" Magaland is trying to sell
31 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
At some point, and maybe this is the point, she should know that she has done all she can to save him and she has placated his faithful followers (of which, she likely is one), and then the best thing is to get removed from the case altogether.
justthenews.com?
LOL!
30 -
Trump is a stain wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
At some point, and maybe this is the point, she should know that she has done all she can to save him and she has placated his faithful followers (of which, she likely is one), and then the best thing is to get removed from the case altogether.
Anyone else—anyone—who stole national security documents, hid them, violated a subpoena to return them, lied to his own lawyers about them, obstructed the FBI search in getting them back as Trump did would have been tried, convicted and would be serving a multi year sentence in prison right now.
Let's add that they tried to destroy their own surveillance video that showed them moving the boxes around (hiding them) and then, mysteriously, the room with the server was flooded with water from a swimming pool.
What would the right be saying if Hillary had done THAT?
30 -
Winnie the poo wrote:
It's like CNN but less biased.
00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.