the TRUMP way. Sucks wrote:
Math is hard! wrote:
the Hillary way. Suck...s!!!!!!
Agreed
I agree with you brother!
I might be flagpole
the TRUMP way. Sucks wrote:
Math is hard! wrote:
the Hillary way. Suck...s!!!!!!
Agreed
I agree with you brother!
I might be flagpole
the TRUMP way. Sucks wrote:
Math is hard! wrote:
the TRUMP way. Suck...s!!!!!!
Agreed
I agree with you brother!
I might be hardloper
quote]Math is hard! wrote:
the HRC way. Suck...s!!!!!![/quote]
Agreed[/quote]
I agree with you brother!
I might be flagpole[/quote]
Trump’s Popularity Revisits Low as Government Agencies Shut Down
39% approve of Trump, 56% don’t — matching nadir of his popularity in August 2017, after Charlottesville protests.
52% of Trump voters believe he won’t get full funding for border wall.
Math is hard! wrote:
Trump’s Popularity Revisits Low as Government Agencies Shut Down
39% approve of Trump, 56% don’t — matching nadir of his popularity in August 2017, after Charlottesville protests.
52% of Trump voters believe he won’t get full funding for border wall.
https://morningconsult.com/2018/12/26/trumps-popularity-revisits-low-as-government-agencies-shut-down/
You can add:
60 percent of young people, African-Americans, college-educated whites, oppose the wall.
Deplorables wrote:
Math is hard! wrote:
Trump’s Popularity Revisits Low as Government Agencies Shut Down
39% approve of Trump, 56% don’t — matching nadir of his popularity in August 2017, after Charlottesville protests.
52% of Trump voters believe he won’t get full funding for border wall.
https://morningconsult.com/2018/12/26/trumps-popularity-revisits-low-as-government-agencies-shut-down/You can add:
60 percent of young people, African-Americans, college-educated whites, oppose the wall.
Those people's votes don't count as much as real Trump voters. ??❗️?
Croatian wrote:
No dog in this fight wrote:
One of the characteristics that's seen in his favor--his fluency in Spanish--would *precisely* be a considerable liability among the (large) number of voters who want people in this country to *stop* speaking Spanish.
You seem to be okay with Melania speaking Croatian—a scary foreign language like Spanish. She speaks when talking with her parents, who Trump allowed to chain immigrate to the U.S—Trump hates chain immigration and vows to ban it. Then you also have Trump, who is not fluent in English, as his Tweets prove. Yet, somehow, Trump is your 100% front-runner for 2020 because … why?
You seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
Please try to avoid such confusion in your mind in the future.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
PIO! wrote:
Croatian wrote:
You seem to be okay with Melania speaking Croatian—a scary foreign language like Spanish. She speaks when talking with her parents, who Trump allowed to chain immigrate to the U.S—Trump hates chain immigration and vows to ban it. Then you also have Trump, who is not fluent in English, as his Tweets prove. Yet, somehow, Trump is your 100% front-runner for 2020 because … why?
You seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
Please try to avoid such confusion in your mind in the future.
RetardLoper. Beto speaks a scary foreign language. Melania speaks a scary foreign language. That is too much for your handle stealing tiny brain to grasp.
Runningart2004 wrote:
FL doesn’t really matter like it used to.
WI and MI will be solid Dem again, like they’ve been for a very long time prior to 2016.
PA will also slide back into the Dem column.
Those were the closest states so it makes sense to start there.
Alan
What?
Trump won Florida by only 1.2% and it has 29 electoral votes, more than any of two of those others combined.
Florida matters more than ever.
It's the largest swing state. (until Texas becomes a swing state)
The Democrats can't just give Florida and Ohio to the Republicans to count on PA, Mi and WI.
L L wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
FL doesn’t really matter like it used to.
WI and MI will be solid Dem again, like they’ve been for a very long time prior to 2016.
PA will also slide back into the Dem column.
Those were the closest states so it makes sense to start there.
Alan
What?
Trump won Florida by only 1.2% and it has 29 electoral votes, more than any of two of those others combined.
Florida matters more than ever.
It's the largest swing state. (until Texas becomes a swing state)
The Democrats can't just give Florida and Ohio to the Republicans to count on PA, Mi and WI.
AZ has gone blue in 2018. That is 11 electoral votes the Republicans won't get back in 2020.
MI and its 16 EC votes is all blue for senate in 2019. Trump 'won' MI by all of 0.2%.
WA gave 4 EC votes away to others (3 to Colin Powell). There were 7 EC votes that did not go to Trump or Clinton.
It looks like 2020 will be all about FL, PA and WI. And whatever WA does with its EC votes.
A Less-Kind and Less-Gentle Grand Old Party
Trump is taking some of the most aggressive features of the Republican Party in some less-than-grand new directions. Republicans face a moment of truth about their identity: Are they willing to give up much of their heritage?
McClatchy just reported that an Eastern European intelligence agency has data showing that Cohen's cell phone was in Prague. McClatchy also reports that the agency intercepted a Russian conversation stating Cohen was meeting there in the summer of 2016.
If accurate, this intelligence confirms yet another element of the Steele dossier. This one is probably the most damning yet because it confirms direct strategy meetings between Russians and the Trump campaign.
Also, LawFare.com just came out with an article comparing the dossier's assertions to things we now know to be true through court filings and congressional testimony. It found that a whole lot of the dossier has been confirmed and nothing has been found to be false.
As I've said before, this is truly astounding. Raw intelligence is just the reporting of "gossip" from Steele's sources. You would expect at least some of it to be wrong. So far, the dossier is batting a thousand.
Fat hurts wrote:
McClatchy just reported that an Eastern European intelligence agency has data showing that Cohen's cell phone was in Prague. McClatchy also reports that the agency intercepted a Russian conversation stating Cohen was meeting there in the summer of 2016.
If accurate, this intelligence confirms yet another element of the Steele dossier. This one is probably the most damning yet because it confirms direct strategy meetings between Russians and the Trump campaign.
Also, LawFare.com just came out with an article comparing the dossier's assertions to things we now know to be true through court filings and congressional testimony. It found that a whole lot of the dossier has been confirmed and nothing has been found to be false.
As I've said before, this is truly astounding. Raw intelligence is just the reporting of "gossip" from Steele's sources. You would expect at least some of it to be wrong. So far, the dossier is batting a thousand.
And Trump WAS in Russia —claimed he wasn't— where the peepee tape is supposed to have occurred. … Putin knows when to make such tapes to protect his interests.
Fat hurts wrote:
McClatchy just reported that an Eastern European intelligence agency has data showing that Cohen's cell phone was in Prague. McClatchy also reports that the agency intercepted a Russian conversation stating Cohen was meeting there in the summer of 2016.
If accurate, this intelligence confirms yet another element of the Steele dossier. This one is probably the most damning yet because it confirms direct strategy meetings between Russians and the Trump campaign.
Also, LawFare.com just came out with an article comparing the dossier's assertions to things we now know to be true through court filings and congressional testimony. It found that a whole lot of the dossier has been confirmed and nothing has been found to be false.
As I've said before, this is truly astounding. Raw intelligence is just the reporting of "gossip" from Steele's sources. You would expect at least some of it to be wrong. So far, the dossier is batting a thousand.
Trump to the military:
"You protect us. We are always going to protect you. And you just saw that, 'cause you just got one of the biggest pay raises you've ever received. ... You haven't gotten one in more than 10 years. More than 10 years. And we got you a big one. I got you a big one. I got you a big one."
"They had plenty of people that came up, they said, 'You know, we could make it smaller. We could make it 3%, we could make it 2%, we could make it 4%,'" Trump told the troops about the latest pay raise. "I said, 'No. Make it 10%. Make it more than 10%.'"
Fact:
Military pay has increased every year for more than three decades. It was raised 2.4% in 2018 and then 2.6% in 2019.
He lied directly to the troops stationed abroad and told them they are a getting a 10% pay increase.
Scum
Ingrish wrote:
PIO! wrote:
You seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
Please try to avoid such confusion in your mind in the future.
RetardLoper. Beto speaks a scary foreign language. Melania speaks a scary foreign language. That is too much for your handle stealing tiny brain to grasp.
You seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
Please try to avoid such confusion in your mind in the future.
Ingrish wrote:
PIO! wrote:
You seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
Please try to avoid such confusion in your mind in the future.
RetardLoper. Beto speaks a scary foreign language. Melania speaks a scary foreign language. That is too much for your handle stealing tiny brain to grasp.
I seem to be conflating two completely different things:
1) Personal preferences
2) Understanding of national preferences
I will try to avoid such confusion in my mind in the future.[/quote]
Trumpism leads to the falling of Trump favorite, Fox News.
MSNBC > Fox News wrote:
Trumpism leads to the falling of Trump favorite, Fox News.
https://www.nbcumv.com/news/msnbc-1-cable-news-network-week-dec-17-beating-fox-news-1st-time-17-years
It's just too much winning. Fox viewers can't take so much winning. They needed to take a break from all this winning!