Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

The report also talks about the terrible effects that are happening now.

And you are lying about disease vectors. Infection rates have indeed skyrocketed. Al was right.

Is it your position that it's just fine to let global temperatures continue to rise?

Will you continue to argue that you are smarter than the scientific community?

I'm right about disease vectors and Gore was wrong. Malaria decline 2000-2015:

How much of an impact on the global temperature do you realistically think we can have by 2100? We need an actual cost/benefit analysis not just a bunch of scaremongering.

This is true for a lot of issues on both sides.

Members of both parties vote with their party and not their conscience. You can see it when the opposition party introduces a bill and everyone votes for or against along party lines. Then a few years later a very similar bill is introduced by the other party and everyone votes along party lines, but votes in opposition to how they voted the last time.

It's sad that it has become this way.

Hardloper wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

The report also talks about the terrible effects that are happening now.

And you are lying about disease vectors. Infection rates have indeed skyrocketed. Al was right.

Is it your position that it's just fine to let global temperatures continue to rise?

Will you continue to argue that you are smarter than the scientific community?

I'm right about disease vectors and Gore was wrong. Malaria decline 2000-2015:

https://www.who.int/gho/malaria/epidemic/deaths/en/

How much of an impact on the global temperature do you realistically think we can have by 2100? We need an actual cost/benefit analysis not just a bunch of scaremongering.

You are talking about the mortality rate of one specific disease that we are getting better at fighting. You know very well that is not the issue and you are being intentionally misleading.

The problem is infections from all diseases borne from insect vectors such as mosquitoes, fleas, and tics. These infections are unquestionably on the rise in the past 10-15 years. The incidence of these diseases has exploded just as climate scientists predicted.

I ask again, is it just find to let global temperatures continue to rise?

Will you continue to argue that you are smarter than the scientific community?

Fat hurts wrote:

You are talking about the mortality rate of one specific disease that we are getting better at fighting. You know very well that is not the issue and you are being intentionally misleading.

The problem is infections from all diseases borne from insect vectors such as mosquitoes, fleas, and tics. These infections are unquestionably on the rise in the past 10-15 years. The incidence of these diseases has exploded just as climate scientists predicted.

I ask again, is it just find to let global temperatures continue to rise?

Will you continue to argue that you are smarter than the scientific community?

"My mind is made up! Do not confuse me with 'facts' and 'logic'!"

Hardloper wrote:

I'm right . . . scaremongering.

^ Hardloper exposing more of his ignorance. He knows more about anything than anyone in the History of the Universe. That is why he is in love with Trump -- two of a kind.

Hardloper wrote:

How much of an impact on the global temperature do you realistically think we can have by 2100? We need an actual cost/benefit analysis not just a bunch of scaremongering.

You remain one dumb mofo.

drama queen agip wrote:

I'm trying to imagine your reaction if Republican congresspeople were suggesting to nuke people (Eric Swalwell D-CA), committing voter fraud (Florida), or baselessly calling the elections they lose 'stolen' (Georgia). I'm not worried about those things myself, I'm just picturing how much you'd be shrieking if Republicans did those things.

Or, the State party actively promotes racists, voters supporting a racist, and a President publicly supporting a racist.

Trump: Hyde-Smith an ‘outstanding person’

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Trump: Hyde-Smith an ‘outstanding person’

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/24/cindy-hyde-smith-segregation-high-school-mississippi-senate-1012700

Sorry, I don't think this one is fair. How many fourteen-year-olds get to choose their high schools? For most, your parents say where you're gonna go, and that's it.

But THIS one is on her (from the linked article): "Hyde-Smith would go on to enroll her daughter at Brookhaven Academy, another Mississippi segregation school[.]"

Trollminator wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Read the Trump administration report. We are not talking about 10+ years. We are talking about now.

The only thing any of these folks are going to read are trump’s tweets

Yep, like you with Hillary, eh old man? People have posted many factual links on many things, but you ignore those. That makes me smile even more as it shows you've got no backbone. Did you move in with him yet or is your divorce not final yet?

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

drama queen agip wrote:

I'm trying to imagine your reaction if Republican congresspeople were suggesting to nuke people (Eric Swalwell D-CA), committing voter fraud (Florida), or baselessly calling the elections they lose 'stolen' (Georgia). I'm not worried about those things myself, I'm just picturing how much you'd be shrieking if Republicans did those things.

Or, the State party actively promotes racists, voters supporting a racist, and a President publicly supporting a racist.

Trump: Hyde-Smith an ‘outstanding person’

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/24/cindy-hyde-smith-segregation-high-school-mississippi-senate-1012700

Yes, Hillary was clearly a racist and the links that were posted prove it (you hid in the bushes then). You post BS links and no one reads them. It's obvious you are a closet case racist. Your kids have no chance, or have they left you already?

Trollminator. wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

The only thing any of these folks are going to read are trump’s tweets

Yep, like you with Hillary, eh old man? People have posted many factual links on many things, but you ignore those. That makes me smile even more as it shows you've got no backbone. Did you move in with him yet or is your divorce not final yet?

This (^ bolded) is a really good line. It is so funny and intelligent.

pop_pop!v2.2.1 wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Or, the State party actively promotes racists, voters supporting a racist, and a President publicly supporting a racist.

Trump: Hyde-Smith an ‘outstanding person’

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/24/cindy-hyde-smith-segregation-high-school-mississippi-senate-1012700

Yes, Hillary was clearly a racist and the links that were posted prove it (you hid in the bushes then). You post BS links and no one reads them. It's obvious you are a closet case racist. Your kids have no chance, or have they left you already?

Oh look - another really good line! That is very, very clever.

Politically devastating.

Does that mean impeachable?

How about convictable?

Just watching the carnage wrote:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mueller-report-devastating-president-frequent-trump-defender/story?id=59393855

Seems like a bunch of folks think they know what will be in the Mueller report. Kind of like the folks on this thread.

STSBO wrote:

Seems like a bunch of folks think they know what will be in the Mueller report. Kind of like the folks on this thread.

^hardloper

Hardloper's bigly feeling were hurt when a couple of regulars noted he is an idiot of epic proportions.

L L wrote:

Politically devastating.

Does that mean impeachable?

How about convictable?

I've read the same basic outline of the story from Dershowitz elsewhere and got the impression he feels it will not be criminal or impeachable. Just outside being criminal but news which would be bad for the administration in how they have acted before and after the election and including the investigation. News which can and will be argued both ways with no real conclusion.

I've felt this is the way it will go all along . Of course it hasn't happened yet so we don't know but I feel we're still at a spot where it will get worse before we get the report. I think the acting AG is going to cause an uproar at some point.

The Fokus wrote:

L L wrote:

Politically devastating.

Does that mean impeachable?

How about convictable?

I've read the same basic outline of the story from Dershowitz elsewhere and got the impression he feels it will not be criminal or impeachable. Just outside being criminal but news which would be bad for the administration in how they have acted before and after the election and including the investigation. News which can and will be argued both ways with no real conclusion.

I've felt this is the way it will go all along . Of course it hasn't happened yet so we don't know but I feel we're still at a spot where it will get worse before we get the report. I think the acting AG is going to cause an uproar at some point.

That dude is a serious buffoon, all you gotta do is look at him to see it.