I don't want to wade through 20 pages of this thread, so I'll respond to a post I agree with, in part. The European way is better. University is cheap for those who go, but there is also not the same pressure to send all kids to University, as most countries think they also need blue collar workers like electricians and plumbers, and perform aptitude tests to guide students to make a better choice.
I think debt relief is just pulling the weeds, but not killing the roots. Maybe it's OK to temporarily relieve some of the current pressure but we need some serious reform or reversion to the way universities used to be funded, e.g. subsidized by state taxes, and a return to reasonable fees, and elimination of draconian legislation that treats student loan debt differently than credit card debt, or home and car loans.
Granted it was some time ago, but in the '80s, my 4-year University degree at a well known (often mistaken for Ivy League, but it is not) state-subsidized Engineering University cost me about $20K in total over 4-years, including dorm and meals. When I looked at universities for my son, estimated costs to go to UC Davis (a UC California state school, but not UCLA or Berkeley) were $65K per year, or more than $250K over 4-years. This is about what I borrowed for my first house, which I paid back with a 15-year loan. I cannot imagine borrowing the equivalent of two house loans, to be paid back over 30-years, to send my two kids to college, or burdening my kids with such an enormous debt as they are starting their adult life.