SMH....Whites killed millions of blacks just in transport to this hemisphere. Whites killed millions of blacks and native Americans for the last 500 years in this land. Whites all the all time murders.....it even isn't close.
The death of every slave and every descendant of a slave is the responsibility of the black peddlers that forced the white merchants to take them from Africa.
Yeah the people strapping Africans down to be shipped across the ocean without moving in the 1600s were the good guys.
How many white on black homicides per year? Compare to black on black
Explain how white privilege is affected by black on black crime? But before that explain all the decisions in America leading up to large pockets of blacks living in run down areas. Which is bizarre considering this country was built by my ancestors for FREE. All while some of your ancestors or people that look like you actually established wealth off of the FREE labor. That they raped, strategically separated, and killed the entire time.
Like alluded to very early in the thread it's probably moreso black disadvantage nowadays. But the damage has already been done. Y'all can address the free labor, jim crow laws, segregation, reparations(highlighted to trigger the racists) Then we can get into black privilege or black on black crime like you'd rather talk about.
Actually I'll leave you with this. White privilege is living in a country that wouldn't even allow blacks to drink the same water. Don't believe me go find one. Some of those same faucets are still standing literally and people want to keep them.
Explain how white privilege is affected by black on black crime? But before that explain all the decisions in America leading up to large pockets of blacks living in run down areas. Which is bizarre considering this country was built by my ancestors for FREE. All while some of your ancestors or people that look like you actually established wealth off of the FREE labor. That they raped, strategically separated, and killed the entire time.
Like alluded to very early in the thread it's probably moreso black disadvantage nowadays. But the damage has already been done. Y'all can address the free labor, jim crow laws, segregation, reparations(highlighted to trigger the racists) Then we can get into black privilege or black on black crime like you'd rather talk about.
Actually I'll leave you with this. White privilege is living in a country that wouldn't even allow blacks to drink the same water. Don't believe me go find one. Some of those same faucets are still standing literally and people want to keep them.
No. You think someone else built it 😭. Please explain
The majority of the population lived in the north. There were very few slaves in the north...
You've been lied to.
Already beat your post bro. How many slaves escaped George Washington again ? The first president of this country who had free black labor as well . Who definitely didn't live in the south 😭😂🤣. I'm done with the thread. Back to track for me
The majority of the population lived in the north. There were very few slaves in the north...
You've been lied to.
Already beat your post bro. How many slaves escaped George Washington again ? The first president of this country who had free black labor as well . Who definitely didn't live in the south 😭😂🤣. I'm done with the thread. Back to track for me
Where do you think George Washington lived you idiot?
It is endlessly amusing how confidently stupid people like you are.
Already beat your post bro. How many slaves escaped George Washington again ? The first president of this country who had free black labor as well . Who definitely didn't live in the south 😭😂🤣. I'm done with the thread. Back to track for me
Where do you think George Washington lived you idiot?
It is endlessly amusing how confidently stupid people like you are.
And what does any of this have to do with white privilege being dead and gone OVER in 2024?
No. You think someone else built it 😭. Please explain
The majority of the population lived in the north. There were very few slaves in the north...
You've been lied to.
True, and even in the South slaves didn't build much of anything. They were the basis of an obsolete economy once the Industrial Revolution hit American shores.
It wasn't blacks who migrated en mass westward building cities and towns along the way. It wasn't blacks who built the railroad (and it wasn't the Chinese either). It wasn't blacks who removed the Native American from the prime locations of the frontier now occupied by great American urban areas.
Blacks came west later, riding on the railroads built by the whites
The majority of the population lived in the north. There were very few slaves in the north...
You've been lied to.
Already beat your post bro. How many slaves escaped George Washington again ? The first president of this country who had free black labor as well . Who definitely didn't live in the south 😭😂🤣. I'm done with the thread. Back to track for me
George Washington was a Virginian. Last I checked, Virginia was a Southern state. The army led by General Lee that opposed the Union Army of the Potomac was the Army of Northern Virginia.
Already beat your post bro. How many slaves escaped George Washington again ? The first president of this country who had free black labor as well . Who definitely didn't live in the south 😭😂🤣. I'm done with the thread. Back to track for me
George Washington was a Virginian. Last I checked, Virginia was a Southern state. The army led by General Lee that opposed the Union Army of the Potomac was the Army of Northern Virginia.
Last time you didn't check. If you checked you'd see is all I said was Washington had runaway slaves and Winston Smith wanted to not talk about why George washington had slaves and made this into geography class. then tried to sound smart by saying I was confidently stupid. All while not addressing my main point. It's cool. You guys don't even want to acknowledge it. That's the privilege
Gone for real this time
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
George Washington was a Virginian. Last I checked, Virginia was a Southern state. The army led by General Lee that opposed the Union Army of the Potomac was the Army of Northern Virginia.
Last time you didn't check. If you checked you'd see is all I said was Washington had runaway slaves and Winston Smith wanted to not talk about why George washington had slaves and made this into geography class. then tried to sound smart by saying I was confidently stupid. All while not addressing my main point. It's cool. You guys don't even want to acknowledge it. That's the privilege
Gone for real this time
Why did Washington have slaves? He was a Virginian landowner in the late 18th century. It would have been anomalous if he didn't have slaves.
George Washington was a Virginian. Last I checked, Virginia was a Southern state. The army led by General Lee that opposed the Union Army of the Potomac was the Army of Northern Virginia.
Last time you didn't check. If you checked you'd see is all I said was Washington had runaway slaves and Winston Smith wanted to not talk about why George washington had slaves and made this into geography class. then tried to sound smart by saying I was confidently stupid. All while not addressing my main point. It's cool. You guys don't even want to acknowledge it. That's the privilege
Gone for real this time
Quite a few of the founders had slaves. It was normal practice at the time and they were super convenient.
Have you ever dug a ditch? It sucks. It's way easier to make you do it.
This post was edited 36 seconds after it was posted.
Today, in all western countries with the most equality, with no laws against other races, there is still an advantage for you not only if you are white, but if your surname indicates that you could be white.
A study by Andrew Leigh et al (former prof at ANU now cabinet minister in Australian govt), using fake job applications for entry level waiting, data entry, customer service and sales jobs, and varying only the surname, resulted it the following.
Apparently on LRC, if you post info on a peer reviewed research on sub concious bias in recruitment, you get voted down. Yet no one here is a racist??
Today, in all western countries with the most equality, with no laws against other races, there is still an advantage for you not only if you are white, but if your surname indicates that you could be white.
A study by Andrew Leigh et al (former prof at ANU now cabinet minister in Australian govt), using fake job applications for entry level waiting, data entry, customer service and sales jobs, and varying only the surname, resulted it the following.
Apparently on LRC, if you post info on a peer reviewed research on sub concious bias in recruitment, you get voted down. Yet no one here is a racist??
Maybe it is too close to the truth.
I down voted your first post because:
1. You referenced an Australian article from 2009.
2. You didn't link it so anyone else could read it and see if what you say about it is accurate or determine how credible the research/article was.
3. While we can't tell because we can't read it, the research and conclusions seem pretty dubious from your summary.
4. What little info I did find, leads me to believe that this statement or conclusion -- "African sounding? Sorry, you need >200% more applications" -- was not in the article. It appears you got that somewhere else or made it up.
I downvoted your new post because:
1. Claims of "subconscious bias" always strike me as bullsh!t. "You don't know you're a racist, but I do."
2. You engaged in the DiAngelo logic/tautology/Catch-22 of saying that anyone who disagrees with you does so because you are "too close to the truth."
3. You appear to make the very pompous, conclusory claim that anyone who downvoted you is a racist. At least that's how I read the first two sentences. More DiAngeloismness.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.