Can you two just share contact details and speak to eachother directly? You've completely derailed this thread with your back and forth bickering and each time people come back thinking there might actually be a substantial update on the 50x Kenyan busts we were promised.
Can you two just share contact details and speak to eachother directly? You've completely derailed this thread with your back and forth bickering and each time people come back thinking there might actually be a substantial update on the 50x Kenyan busts we were promised.
You are free to provide that information. You're also free to comment. But is this it?
Then you don't understand what "yes" means. But I cannot be bothered going back to where you were over a decade ago, when you started debating these issues, to persuade you of something you won't see.
Then you don't understand what "yes" means. But I cannot be bothered going back to where you were over a decade ago, when you started debating these issues, to persuade you of something you won't see.
Don't go back to whereever or whenever I was at anytime or anyplace -- just go back to the where the data was that supports you now. I can be persuaded by data but will never see it if you never show it.
My views were persuaded by facts, observation and evidence. What is sure is I cannot be further persuaded by those who don't bother to try, nor by those who chose to follow false idols.
I don't have to be too specific. You've shown it over years of posts. That's why Sage describes you as clueless.
Occam's razor, and history, says you cannot. You can only preach gospel, appeal to false authorities, and insult.
If you truly understood Occam's razor it would show you that the simplest explanation for continuous improvements in the sport is the availability of widely used and mostly undetectable drugs.
My views were persuaded by facts, observation and evidence. What is sure is I cannot be further persuaded by those who don't bother to try, nor by those who chose to follow false idols.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
My views were persuaded by facts, observation and evidence. What is sure is I cannot be further persuaded by those who don't bother to try, nor by those who chose to follow false idols.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
Wouldn't surprise me if rekrunner is a mod. In any case, we know that several of the mods are hardcore doping apologists, including John Wesley Harding.
Tecla Chemabwai, a legendary figure in Kenyan athletics and the first Kenyan woman to grace the Olympics, says certain agents are exploiting the country's at...
My views were persuaded by facts, observation and evidence. What is sure is I cannot be further persuaded by those who don't bother to try, nor by those who chose to follow false idols.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
From "rekrunner has the mods on his side" (is this true?) you deduce they have the same view on doping (uninformed?) AND rekrunner loses all the arguments.
- rekrunner is uninformed (definitely not true, but...)
- the mods have same view, so they are also "uninformed"
My views were persuaded by facts, observation and evidence. What is sure is I cannot be further persuaded by those who don't bother to try, nor by those who chose to follow false idols.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
It's not about having the mods on his side, it's your constant insults.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
It's not about having the mods on his side, it's your constant insults.
Part of free speech is that stupidity doesn't have to be respected. That means rekrunner and you get the respect you deserve.
I've noticed you have the mods on your side on these threads. That shows they hold the same uninformed views on the role of doping in the sport and that you lose all the arguments so they have to protect you.
From "rekrunner has the mods on his side" (is this true?) you deduce they have the same view on doping (uninformed?) AND rekrunner loses all the arguments.
- rekrunner is uninformed (definitely not true, but...)
- the mods have same view, so they are also "uninformed"
- so rekrunner loses all the arguments
Armstronglogic at his best.
Since you deny what is factually correct you won't get any of the arguments.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.