Lausanne 1000m...get ready...

Letsrunsdumbestposter wrote:

Mrr82 wrote:

Apparently you're bad at math or reading, or both. He's obviously adding 28 (half of 56) to 1:15 which is 1:43.

Embarrassing to call someone ignorant when you're the fool.

You are clearly letsrun's dumbest poster!! He said 1:15+56 would get the WR, and your dumb brain said that would be a 800m WR en route. He said 1:43 (obviously 1:15+28) is not a WR unless it's Caster running it as a Woman.

You have a 4 year old reading ability and 3 year old math ability. Stop posting please....

That is pretty good for 2 year old.

Ventolin is still fighting hard with the concept of a tangent. Any chance someone else can explain to him what the sense of this curved starting line is? I did my best, but obviously failed badly.

But wait, he will not comprehend, regardless how good the explanation is.

NO, you are the joke!

You must be quite embarrassed with your nonsensical predictions for Kiprop and Souleiman?

Neither could get close to the WR. And looks like Souleiman is a better 1000m guy than Kipflop!

Ngeny, who was Mr EPO Two season wonder, never run 6m extra. I remember all the other posters telling you so at the time. Pure fantasy.

It's always amusing to see you crash and burn with your ... cough... predictions.

Souleiman was given good pace there and was straining every sinew down the home straight and still was 1.5 outside the WR.

Was it too hot or cold?

Was it too moist or windy?

We wait with baited breath on your post race analysis.

Calculo, you are an idiot. It doesn't matter how much math you do, but it matters not at all what lane you start the race in if you run the race correctly.

No, no one will kindly tell you anything, because you are rude and disrespectful to everyone who disagrees with you. None of the regular posters agreed with you last time you brought up this nonsense of running 6m wide on the first bend. They all disagreed with you then and it will be the same now. People don't need to use math they can tell with their own 2 eyes. Now I suggest you use another name and pretend someone else agrees with you to make you feel better about yourself.

said88 wrote:Ventolin is still fighting hard with the concept of a

tangent

who ?

Any chance someone else can explain to him what the sense of this curved starting line is?

i estimated for it very accurately

doing it absolutely accurately for Noah in outer lane-4 needs back-of-envelope but i can't bother to reach it

I did my best, but obviously failed badly.

as you offer no math, i reckon it is negligible

But wait, he will not comprehend, regardless how good the explanation is.

cut the drivel

offer the math to when Noah shouda theoretically reached 30cm from kerb

if it is significant variant from

~ 21m

than assumed same pace as pacer in lane-1, then you show some good basic skills & worth replying to & i'll take correction

if my above is correct then you offer splits for Ryun's Dusseldorf & estimate of extra run wide & drafting

offer something...

you are outta your depth

not when pacer took them thru in rubish 1'46++

not off that rubbish pacing

you claimed 1'46+ is WR pacing ???!!!

looks like Asbel had no interest

it looks severely to me Asbel has no decent manager like

jlt

who posts on T&F

known as templeton, who manages 1'40.91

Asbel is severely lacking in manager-input or runs wild, now losing

no game plan in his running, which even neophyte coud offer

drivel

he got wrecked by an RTA

as for extra distance on 1st 200

impress me :

show me the math !

when shoud he have been in inner lane-1 according to math ???

then not you

obviously your math not upto job

offer me math off when guy in outer lane-4 shoud reach 30cm from kerb ???

if you can't, then don't waste my time

no

you have no math to offer

how much distance for runner in outer lane-4 on curved start to reach 30cm from kerb in a 1k ?

eh ?

can't you read ??

i said dipping into 2'12s woud be good considering jetlag

it wouda been lot quicker for rubbish pace

nonsense

1'46+

was crap pace

do you have a clue about what is correct 1k pace ??

eh ?

do you have a clue about pacing ?

1'46+ is utter rubbish for a 1k

he did hugely to get to 2'13+

no

good conditions

pacing was crap

unfortunately no "Billy Konchellah" to pace these meets

eh ?

obvious to anyone with clue about sport

Souly was only guy interested in clocking but pacing was utter crap

Phil Fondacaro wrote:Calculo, you are an idiot

wow

serious poster

It doesn't matter how much math you do

wow

why not required math ???

you advocate everyone here get stoopid ???

but it matters not at all what lane you start the race in

is this a joke ???

do you have any clue about the geometry for curved 1k start ???

when are guys supposed to get to inner-1 from lanes 1, 2 , 3..7, 8 ???

impress me

after how much running is guy at start in outer lane-4 supposed to get to 30cm from kerb ???

if you run the race correctly

i'm telling you how math says the race shoud be run correctly !!!

no

i expect response as limitless math talent here, not basic

no

i expect math talent to look at posted

how much distance for Noah in outer lane-4 to get into 30cm from kerb ???

eh ?

i ask this question 1st time

i'm not interested in "regular posters"

i'm interested in guy who can analyse & answer :

how much distance for Noah in outer lane-4 to get into 30cm from kerb ???

is this a joke ???

who are you talking about ???

i ask a geometry problem

you are outta your depth, so waste time

is this a joke ???

starting out in outer lane-4 & when to get into 30cm from kerb is not "eyeball" nonsense

it requires math

do you have any clue what math is ??

stop wasting my time

if you have the math, answer this :

how much distance for Noah in outer lane-4 to get into 30cm from kerb ???

Even if Ngeny would have run ON THE CURVED LINE to lane 1 (hardly the shortest possible way - even for old ventolin this should be obvious), it still would be less than 6m extra. But he almost ran a tangent, so not worth talking about it.

Another of your posts littered with inaccuracies.

Please tell us which pacer took them through in 1:46 + tonight, as you claim?

Answer - no one. Souleiman already went into lead at 750m and he went through 800 in 1:45.9, which is 2:12.3 pace, not pathetic at all. Souleiman went through 600 in 79.6, which is 2:12.6 pace. There was nothing wrong with pace. His first four 200s ranged from 26.3 to 26.8. Very even pacing. But even off 2:12 mid pace he couldn't maintain it over the last 200m, which was only 27.54.

So we've had all the excuses now for Kipflop.

Too hot, too cold, too windy, too wet, too tired, too much travelling, too many drug tests, can't be bothered,.... and now it's the fault of his agent and management not being good enough😉

Seriously? Is that the best you can offer?

Why is someone in 3:26 and 1:41 shape coming 4th in 2:14.2? Lol.

I know who Rudisha's agent is thank you.

I don't feel any need to produce the math for Ngeny's curve because it's obvious to anyone with a brain that he never run anything approaching 6m on the first bend.

You get what you get wrote:

Makhloufi

52.2

1:18.80

1:46.1

2:13.08

Makh Daddy's splits in that 2:13.08, in comparison to Coe and Ngeny's splits, show that had the pacer been of a higher caliber and gone a bit faster, he would have had a great shot at the record. As it was, he was running up on the heels of the pacer, as indicated by his speeding up a bit the last 200m when he was on his own (52/26.6/27.3/26.9) where you expect substantial slowdown here.

You sure waste a lot of time, energy, and board space getting upset by other people. Maybe just try stating your opinion, and not taking the bait always, calculo...?