Baloney man wrote:
Get your facts straight wrote:[quote]Not the HSR wrote:
[quote]Get your facts straight wrote:
Roy Martin's 31 yr old HSR lives to see another year
Apparently not. Lyles' run is being called a HSR on every site I can find.
If by every single site, you mean flotrack, then you've been given misinformation. Flotrack has erred on several occasions. The fact of the matter is that Lyles ran an AJR yesterday, and nothing more.
Again, you lack context. The UIL had an electronic time on record for Martin's and Neal's races (among others) and submitted them in the early 2000s to be officially ratified as HSR. Face value is no value.
Get your facts straight wrote:
The fact of the matter is that Lyles ran an AJR yesterday, and nothing more.
Correct. I look forward to Lyles and Norman going mano-a-mano at the World Juniors, that is assuming they both go to Poland and run the 1200m.
The IAAF has rebranded the World Juniors to the dopey name of IAAF U20 Championships*.
http://www.usatf.org/Events---Calendar/2016/IAAF-World-Junior-Championships.aspxGet your facts straight wrote:
Again, you lack context. The UIL had an electronic time on record for Martin's and Neal's races (among others) and submitted them in the early 2000s to be officially ratified as HSR. Face value is no value.
Not FAT. Not a real FAT result.
BTW, I see you didn't provide a link. That's because the time doesn't exist.
Not the HSR wrote:
Get your facts straight wrote:Again, you lack context. The UIL had an electronic time on record for Martin's and Neal's races (among others) and submitted them in the early 2000s to be officially ratified as HSR. Face value is no value.
Not FAT. Not a real FAT result.
BTW, I see you didn't provide a link. That's because the time doesn't exist.
Nope the burden of proof (and research) is on you, since I'm only recapitulating what the record books say. You on the other hand are trying to weave some conspiracy theory (by ignoring the blatant facts) and trying to pass it off as truth.
A link to results and some rules that offer no insight hardly count as evidence. Try again conspiracy theorist
Reading comprehension is not one of your skills.
Not real FAT times at the Texas State Meet until 1995.
Not the HSR wrote:
Reading comprehension is not one of your skills.
Not real FAT times at the Texas State Meet until 1995.
But doesn't mean electronic times WERENT on record, which the UIL apparently had. You have to THINK!
Critical thinking and understanding context clearly isn't a skill of yours
Great run by Lyles yesterday to set the high school record.
Not sure if it's Roy posting on here as "get your facts straight", but it's just sad whoever it is.
Congrats Noah! HSR and AJR!!!
The AJR . . . wrote:
Get your facts straight wrote:The fact of the matter is that Lyles ran an AJR yesterday, and nothing more.
Correct. I look forward to Lyles and Norman going mano-a-mano at the World Juniors, that is assuming they both go to Poland and run the 1200m.
The IAAF has rebranded the World Juniors to the dopey name of IAAF U20 Championships*.
http://www.usatf.org/Events---Calendar/2016/IAAF-World-Junior-Championships.aspx
Well Noah's running the 100m and Michael's running the 200m at the U20 champs, so no matchup unfortunately, but it would be nice if they were invited to a circuit meet for a rematch of yesterday's final.
Get your facts straight wrote:
Not the HSR wrote:Reading comprehension is not one of your skills.
Not real FAT times at the Texas State Meet until 1995.
But doesn't mean electronic times WERENT on record, which the UIL apparently had. You have to THINK!
Critical thinking and understanding context clearly isn't a skill of yours
Thinking is not one of your skills. The UIL is the official record keeper and administrator of TX athletic results. There are no official FAT times prior to 1995 in Texas for HS meets.
Hiya folks wrote:
Great run by Lyles yesterday to set the high school record.
Not sure if it's Roy posting on here as "get your facts straight", but it's just sad whoever it is.
Congrats Noah! HSR and AJR!!!
Hi Flotrack, this isnt Roy Martin. Just someone who applies critical thinking and doesn't believe a second rate track article just because it's published.
Stay delusional my friend. Roy Martin's HSR survives another year, but congrats to Noah on the AJR.
Hiya folks wrote:
Not sure if it's Roy posting on here as "get your facts straight", but it's just sad whoever it is.
Some people just don't like losing "their" records. That means they are no longer "the best."
Get your facts straight wrote:
Hiya folks wrote:Not sure if it's Roy posting on here as "get your facts straight", but it's just sad whoever it is.
Hi Flotrack, this isnt Roy Martin.
Denial always means guilty. Roy, Roy's BFF, wife, kids, cousins, daddy, mommy. All cannot accept Roy lost his record.
Not the HSR wrote:
Get your facts straight wrote:But doesn't mean electronic times WERENT on record, which the UIL apparently had. You have to THINK!
Critical thinking and understanding context clearly isn't a skill of yours
Thinking is not one of your skills. The UIL is the official record keeper and administrator of TX athletic results. There are no official FAT times prior to 1995 in Texas for HS meets.
Keep parroting the same nonsense, while the record books paint the true picture.
Face value is no value
Lost His Record wrote:
Get your facts straight wrote:Hi Flotrack, this isnt Roy Martin.
Denial always means guilty. Roy, Roy's BFF, wife, kids, cousins, daddy, mommy. All cannot accept Roy lost his record.
No sometimes denial means not guilty (as in my case). In any event deflection and non sequitur isn't an argument. Roy still has his HSR intact, Noah broke his AJR. End of story.
Stay delusional Flotrack.
Get your facts straight wrote:
Lost His Record wrote:Denial always means guilty. Roy, Roy's BFF, wife, kids, cousins, daddy, mommy. All cannot accept Roy lost his record.
No sometimes denial means not guilty (as in my case). In any event deflection and non sequitur isn't an argument. Roy still has his HSR intact, Noah broke his AJR. End of story.
Stay delusional Flotrack.
It's clear in your previous posts what your opinion is. It's also clear that you won't be swayed from that opinion. Quit ruining this thread by debating that off topic opinion. Start another thread if you insist on continuing that discussion.
Wahh!! Boawdkeeper he won't accept my faulty argument as fact. Ban him!
LMAO. This isnt sprintzone.
The ball is in your court to change the temperature on this thread.
I'd love to actually talk about the budding rivalry between Lyles and Norman.
HA! HA! HA!!! Get your facts straight has let me troll this thread. I am so proud of myself. I need to take a cold shower now.
What a strange thread.
Noah Lyles set the HSR yesterday. No question.
It will not be a NFHS record, and no one cares at all (except, strangely, one or two trolling posters on this thread). No one of any importance pays any attention to those.
Great job to a great athlete. New HSR after coming close a few times. Martin's former record was definitely solid.
BisonHurdler, M.D. wrote:
What a strange thread.
Noah Lyles set the HSR yesterday. No question.
It will not be a NFHS record, and no one cares at all (except, strangely, one or two trolling posters on this thread). No one of any importance pays any attention to those.
Great job to a great athlete. New HSR after coming close a few times. Martin's former record was definitely solid.
"My delusion is justified because I'm an MD"
The fact that you don't take it seriously doesn't mean that it's not relevant, so your comment is irrelevant. The NFHS officially ratifies HSRs whether you like it or not, and as per their rules, no HSR was broken yesterday Hurdler Doc.
I sure hope you take the Hippocratic oath seriously though....