Report: Chinese 10,000 WR holder Wang Junxia admitted to Chinese doping in 1995

There's no doubt in my mind that the Chinese distance runners from the 1993 Worlds were doped. They were so juiced to the gills they did not even look feminine, sort of like the East German swim team of androids at the '76 Olympics.

Renato also said they were doped

If it quacks like a duck... wrote:

There's no doubt in my mind that the Chinese distance runners from the 1993 Worlds were doped. They were so juiced to the gills they did not even look feminine, sort of like the East German swim team of androids at the '76 Olympics.

I just saw a picture of the Chinese runners a day they sure looked feminine to me. Maybe you don't know what you're talking about.

Didn't El Gourig go to Oregon?

J.R. wrote:

Not Huge Yet wrote:

The IAAF is not sure the letter claiming drug use is real. Interesting.

Not so interesting. Here's another quote from the article.

Two-time US Olympian PattiSue Plumer told the Chicago Tribune in 1995 that she thought drugs were involved.

Hehehe. So scientific.

In fact, since Coe is in he's blaming the Russians, the Chinese, anyone else, but of course he, Radcliffe and the other UK dopers are all pure, which is hogwash.

Suck it.

Seb Coen wrote:

The fact that Dibaba could possibly run 29:31 or faster and it took an extremely doped Chineese athlete do it should say something.

Just like Dibaba is now 6 sec faster than the next non chineese/soviet union athlete over 1500.

Yep. Dibaba is as dirty as they come. But the PC weenies are so brainwashed they can't even consider the possibility.

There's No Santa Claus wrote:

Seb Coen wrote:

The fact that Dibaba could possibly run 29:31 or faster and it took an extremely doped Chineese athlete do it should say something.

Just like Dibaba is now 6 sec faster than the next non chineese/soviet union athlete over 1500.

Yep. Dibaba is as dirty as they come. But the PC weenies are so brainwashed they can't even consider the possibility.

It is an accepted fact that only American whites are pure and drug free.

American White Boys wrote:

There's No Santa Claus wrote:

Yep. Dibaba is as dirty as they come. But the PC weenies are so brainwashed they can't even consider the possibility.

It is an accepted fact that only American whites are pure and drug free.

That's why no one accuses Rupp of doping.

nikeman wrote:

Huge news:

http://www.scmp.com/sport/china/article/1909369/forced-state-sponsored-doping-revealed-athletes-who-now-risk-loss-world

Huge fake news.

American White Boys wrote:

There's No Santa Claus wrote:

Yep. Dibaba is as dirty as they come. But the PC weenies are so brainwashed they can't even consider the possibility.

It is an accepted fact that only American whites are pure and drug free.

Have you seen this board's response to some white, American runners? Rupp is accused day in and day out of doping. There's terms like "NOPe Dope", "Centro Sauce", "Oregon Juice" being thrown around without any evidence whatsoever.

The reason Dibaba is now suspect of doping is that she just beat the times of a horde of Chinese and Russian women, almost all of whom are VERY heavily suspect for drug use (hence this thread).

Great info rojo! The effort to get all this together would be great journalism and much needed confirmation of what is/isn't. This is good for sport and your apart of this...looking forward to reading the truth!

Flo'da boy wrote:

The men did run fast. For them.

The Chinese steeple record is 8:10 from the 97 games.

Wrong meet.

The suspect meet is the 1993 Chinese National Games. Not the Shanghai 1997 meet. In the 1993 National Games, the women set world records in the 1500m, 3000m, and 10000m. They also set Area Records (Asian in this case) in the 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 100m hurdles, 400m hurdles, and 4 x 400m relay.

Comparatively, the men set no world records and no area records at all. They even only managed national records in the 100m, 400m, and 400m hurdles. In fact, many of the mens' times (ex. 4 x 400m relays) were slower than the United States HIGH SCHOOL records.

This is the first major issue with the idiotic "Short Track" conspiracy theory, and honestly, should kill it on the spot. How on earth could the top male athletes from China not break their own National Records when they're running on a short track?

The second major issue is that the womens' 1500m times (and ONLY the womens' 1500m times) were replicated in 1997 in Shanghai.

The truth will set you free wrote:

Britain wants to be back on top again, just like in the good 'ol days.

Across the pond wrote:

And after become a champion country again, the Brits will sue to get their illegally taken colonies back from the USA.

They already own the colonies. The queen is the richest women in the world

Guess why.

Fast Dude Runner wrote:

The Chinese 3,000 and 10,000m records align pretty much perfectly with the 5,000m record (McMillan calculator) and when compared with Paula's Marathon record, they can be considered WEAK.

rojo wrote:

Not true. I think the main reason people were shocked is that it came in China and was not on tv and because she ran the 2nd half of the 10,000 faster than the WR.

Wrong. I watched Wang's 10,000m record on a Spanish station on tv, just happened to catch it when flipping through the channels, and was quite excited to see her smash the record. Even more she was such an amazing runner, the best form and rhythm in any runner that I've seen.

Radcliffe's 2:15 would compare to about a 28:48 10,000m for a woman, and has to be the dirtiest record on the books.

J.R. wrote:

Radcliffe's 2:15 would compare to about a 28:48 10,000m for a woman, and has to be the dirtiest record on the books.

How can it be dirty if drugs don't work?

J.R. wrote:

Radcliffe's 2:15 would compare to about a 28:48 10,000m for a woman, and has to be the dirtiest record on the books.

Mr. Obvious wrote:

How can it be dirty if drugs don't work?

Because drugs are against the rules, and Radcliffe uses said rules to have competitors banned, in my opinion what the drug fiasco's all about. Plus it is quite strange that Radcliffe's the only woman who's bettered 2:17. Many men have bettered 2:17, but no other women. There are other ways to be dirty besides using drugs. However we know for fact that Radcliffe has used the drug rules more than any other runner, to have people banned, and to eliminate competition.

this also just in: we need to breathe oxygen to live

Pangolin wrote:

Ma's Army were the first women to train like male runners from the sixties like Ryun, Lindgren,Clarke and Clayton. The women didn't seem to break down like their male counterparts rather were disbanded as the drug busts, which mostly seemed to be in-house,deep-sixed govt support.

Apparently you've never looked at Grete Waitz' training.

J.R. wrote:

J.R. wrote:

Radcliffe's 2:15 would compare to about a 28:48 10,000m for a woman, and has to be the dirtiest record on the books.

Mr. Obvious wrote:

How can it be dirty if drugs don't work?

Because drugs are against the rules, and Radcliffe uses said rules to have competitors banned, in my opinion what the drug fiasco's all about. Plus it is quite strange that Radcliffe's the only woman who's bettered 2:17. Many men have bettered 2:17, but no other women. There are other ways to be dirty besides using drugs. However we know for fact that Radcliffe has used the drug rules more than any other runner, to have people banned, and to eliminate competition.

Paula can't ban people you mental midget.