well,. wrote:
jigsaw jonez wrote:Depends. What's her marathon PR?
I bet her clit is the size of my thumb after all those ´roids.
She's 100% natural. Also has been tested so it's all good.
The reason I picked her as an example (besides her being a genuinely nice person) is to show that no matter how bad your genetics are, if you put your mind to it, you can get RIPPED without being SCRAWNY. If Ryan Hall tried a bit harder, he could have a better PHYSIQUE, too.
I think most people add 2 minutes or so to the Boston elite times that year. I think he had a low 2:07 in him that day. That nearly as good as he ever was. In 2007 I thought we would have a few more Halls. Too bad it has not materialized I think the 64 is more good than bad.
Go Stanford wrote:
That 2:04 was at least 3-4 mins wind aided. Low 64 for Hall is better than he has run. Maybe a 62 high next time out.
jjjjj wrote:1:04's back to the norm for Hall. He's run many of those. Doesn't he think that getting his speed back is important? As an experienced marathoner, Hall at 59:43 again would be a non-aided 2:03-4 marathoner. I don't think that will ever happen again, unfortunately.
Hey, didn't we see you trying to run with the elites in dubai?
lol!