JK wrote:
How serious are you really? Want to find out? If you want to be the best you can be at running, why not do it right? It will mean relocating to (yes, you guessed it) Flagstaff, AZ to train in the only hi-mod-lo protocol in the country. I see people all the time who want to form a serious training group, but they invariably qualify the idea with trying to get the other interested parties to move to (name of THEIR city). You can see the same qualification being presented in this very thread. I'm interested in finding people who REALLY want to be the best - willing to relocate to the most favorable environment and to not merely be part of some "social running" clique. So far, I've only seen evidence that there are about three people in the country who are that dedicated to being their best (or who have the financial independence they THINK they need). So are YOU willing?
Why Flagstaff? Alright, it's at altitude, so why not Boulder or Alamosa or Albuquerque or Gunnison? The answer is that Flagstaff provides the requisite elevation (circa 7,000 ft.) to stimulate a prominent erythropoietin response AND allows for fairly quick access to higher and lower (even close to sea level) elevations. From Flagstaff, you can quickly get to Sedona (4,200 ft.) or Camp Verde (3,200 ft.) for threshold training and to Phoenix (1,000 ft.) for faster running. You MUST run regularly at l-a to maximize the effectiveness of the training. A trial period of a few weeks can be used to determine if you are an altitude responder. If you are a responder, you will never achieve your best performances WITHOUT moving to a h-a site for at least a portion of the year, so forget about staying where you are and asking others to come to you if you want to truly be dedicated to success.
Be prepared to develop a LOT of endurance from the ground up and to perhaps take more time than you think is necessary. This is not a quick fix. In fact, you may very well get SLOWER in the early stages. If you abandon the training for lack of TANGIBLE results after a few months, you are NOT really a serious runner and will not reach your full potential with any group of training partners or at any location (even Kenya, Japan, etc.). Alan Webb, for example, would probably not be a good fit for what I have in mind. This is not to single him out; virtually every runner in the country has the same "I'll try something for several months and if I don't get faster, I'll try something else" attitude. Depending on the individual, that's not always the WORST approach. It might be a healthy attitude (i.e., preserves the joy of the sport) for Alan Webb and for a number of others, but I'm not looking for people with that mindset.
Nor am I looking for people who need external motivation. I've got big news for you: The primary role of a COACH is NOT to motivate someone to run through brick walls. A COACH is someone who knows where the damn DOORS are and can teach the athlete how to find them so there's no need to bash his head against any walls. If you need somebody to fire you up and TELL you to believe in yourself, good luck with all that. You're looking for a motivational speaker, not a RUNNING coach. Just bash your head bloody against those walls, bub. I'm looking for people who LOVE to run and are ALREADY willing to be led through the doors and who will methodically and patiently pass through them while the other suckers are busy getting "psyched up" enough to endure the pain of bashing their brains out IN VAIN.
Now the not-as-good news: If you make this commitment, you will need to find your own sponsorship (if you're at that level already) or will need to have some outside means of income. Not only that, but I (as a professional running coach) expect to be paid a small monthly fee, as well as a 10% cut of any money you might make from races. Criticize if you like, but I believe time and services should not be provided for free. Chumps who give away everything for nothing are unprofessional and don't stick to their principles. I am a professional, not a chump, and I expect compensation. Besides, while free advice is often good advice, there comes a point at which (you know the cliché) "free advice is worth every penny". If you're not willing to make at least a small monetary commitment, you're the kind of person who probably won't last for the long haul and free advice will eventually just go in one ear and out the other.
Also, it is impractical to have a group which is TOO large. Ten to fifteen runners is probably ideal, so if this seminal idea comes to fruition, we may have to limit the number of participants and start imposing time (or other) standards.
Anyway, that's my take on it. As I mentioned, the training will likely be slower (at first) than you might be accustomed to doing, which will be necessary as you adjust to h-a and cope with varied terrain. You need to be able and willing to reach about 150 miles for your higher weeks. This depends, of course, on individual ability to adapt, but this is a WORLD class training protocol, not a typical American anaerobic interval program, and it is not for the person who falls apart at 70 miles per week.
So mull it over.