statistical significance wrote:
lol, this guy is full of shit... a single frame is representative of Ritz's stride for thew hole marathon?
1. This guy is a real joker. "Easily run below 2hrs."
Right now, no-one can run under 2hrs, let alone easily, and certainly not Ritz.
2.
Not only is a single still not representative of Ritz's stride for the whole marathon, but a single still is not accurately representative of ritz's stride for any part of the marathon.
Low res photography, no compensation for parallax error or angles that are not perfectly perpendicular to Rits at the precise moment of capture. It means nothing to put values like 25 or 16 degrees on anything ritz is doing. Furthermore, even with hi-res photography, it can still be very difficult to tell the exact moment of contact for the measuring of the toe lift angle.
Oh yeah
and
there's this
3. The massive increase in stride would require and corrospondingly large increase in energy requirements... a simple unsustainable increase in energy requirements.
This guy is such an asshat.