Uncle Pervy wrote:
Well, I have to admit he was right. I did spell the word wrong. However, I do wonder what drives the motivation to point out typos.
One motivation might be to show you the correct spelling of the word so that the next time you need to write it, you will know the proper way to spell it. Isn't that obvious?
Doesn't mean he is not some know-it-all jerk trying to look smart by correcting others but jerk or not, at least now you know, right?
abacus wrote:
I can't believe blatant sarcasm about the impossibility of negative splitting without drugs seriously got two people worked up.
I don't think finishing a marathon is possible without drugs.
hahahaha - I'm a big lance fan, BUT THOSE SHORTS! that combined with his sleeveless shirt he kinda looks like a punk.
At least he doesn't run in biking shorts.
A 2:50 Marathon in Nike Frees should convert to about 2:40 in a real pair of shoes. Give the guy some respect. I love my feet way too much to run even a 5K in Nike Frees.
Those are 10/2 shorts... I know he wore the same shorts in NYC the first time, not sure about the 2nd NYC..
But honestly... what's the big deal? I rather see those shorts on LA than white tights on 2 black dudes.
Once again, he wasn't running in Frees.
txRUNNERgirl wrote:
Awkward...
http://www.runnersworld.com/cda/microsite/video/0,8034,s6-239-420-20,00.html?bcpid=1439819617&bclid=1463300967&bctid=1515771737
Nope, just boring.
If he wants to be a real runner, he should wear running shorts. If he wants to play basketball, wear basketball shorts.