dmb wrote:
I guess my perception of pessimism is the statement that his form is not efficient enough to best 1:41 now… And I did say slightly.
Then we can agree to disagree.
Because when I watch Josh Hoey run and compare it to both Wilson Kipketer and David Rudisha I see very different things. And if I am honest even when I compare Josh Hoey to Marco Arop, Emmanuel Wanyonyi I also see different things. But that's just my opinion.
I think he can absolutely challenge the US record. Hoppel is better mover than Hoey but Hoey's unbridled determination and force of will could see him run under that. But 101 seconds is a different plateau and the margins for error/inefficiencies as you approach that barrier are so fine and compressed. Going from 1.42.0 to 1.41.5 is not the same as going 1.41.5 to 1.41.0.
You believe Josh Hoey is going to run 1.40.6 this summer? Did I read that right? 1.40.6? Based on that 600? That's very loose logic to just say "if he brings his 800 in line with his 600 then...." You could say that about anyone and any circumstance. If Michael Johnson had bought his 400m PR "in line" with his 200m PR he would have run 42.92. Unfortunately I don't believe it works like this but I'll be happy to revisit this thread in 12 months time and fully eat my words if that's the case and Josh Hoey becomes the 800m world record holder.