Peach Pit wrote:
The issue is Republicans spent 4 years asking "what is a woman?" because it turns out they actually don't know, which is why Trump signed an EO on the first day defining sex as something at conception, even though no one has a sex at conception, or at best, everyone is a woman.
I understand that Republicans think "Women have a vagina and men have a penis, it's biology 101", and they never realized there's actually biology 201, 301, 401, and even grad school classes in biology where things actually get more complicated than you learned in middle school. If you're a fan of running, you may have heard of Caster Semenya, who had internal testes that produced male levels of testosterone, XY chromosomes, yet she was born with a vagina.
So yes, he did sign an EO saying biological men can't compete in women's sports, but Republicans have no clue how to differentiate biological men from biological women. That's not to say that Democrats do a much better job, but at least they recognize the answer is more complicated than "Man have penis woman have vagina"
No, the existence of an extraordinarily rare medical anomaly does not make it complicated. Those situations are very obviously not what the EO is talking about.
This is like saying that age group eligibility is "more complicated" because some people are born on February 29th.