Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
Sorry, gotta disagree. The movie sucked, big time.
On every level, the plot was utterly absurd and disconnected from reality. Why would the Navy send in only a few F-18's when the U.S. Air Force has B-1 and B-2 bombers loaded with huge "bunker buster" munitions? Why weren't other armed services, especially the Air Force, involved with the planning and execution of this raid? Why the hell didn't the Navy and Air Force use their sophisticated radar- and radio-jamming technologies to disrupt and spoof the defenses of the enemy forces guarding the uranium enrichment plant? Why didn't the U.S. military used its arsenal of cruise missiles to knock out the anti-aircraft missile site and radar stations? Why didn't the Navy and Air Force work with other NATO forces, such as the RAF, or with allies like the Israeli Air Force, to take out the site?
I know, no crowd-pleasing summer movie, especially a retread like "Top Gun: Maverick," is supposed to be a documentary with a rigorous fidelity to the facts. But to be taken seriously, a movie like this has to maintain at least a surface veneer of verisimilitude. And on that score this Top Gun sequel failed utterly.
Every military movie ever made is terrible if realism is your primary concern.


