Adios Shelbo800 wrote:
Has any reporter asked Matt?
His side chick got banned. On to the next one
Adios Shelbo800 wrote:
Has any reporter asked Matt?
His side chick got banned. On to the next one
Yankeesallover wrote:
Anyone running for any Nike sponsored program, should not be taken seriously. Nike is funding the doping and making sure athletes are not caught. .
Huh? Except in cases where they don’t want to? Like maybe for instance, Houlihan, who was bound to get some big contractual incentive payments, and she was also vocal about not needing the new super-spikes? Hmmm, are you insinuating that?
themildrunmaster wrote:
Whenever I see a post like this, I immediately wonder if this person is either in the subject group or has an "in" within the group. Like, I know the post is completely logical and everything, but what interest do you have in defending these girls so vehemently unless its actually personal to you?
I don't find it "completely logical", and 'Say huh' is not "in", or they would know that Jager had admitted to his likely doping status. So, either a blind fan or a troll.
These statements from 'Say huh' are all pointless and partly insultive assumptions:
"Your bias is blinding your judgement."
"Your opinion is already set, and anything that is said or happens will only further your personal narrative."
"The crazy thing is, you’ve never met any of these people, let alone spent time with them."
"You know only what you’ve read, and likely only what you’ve read here on letsrun."