Travelling is now mandatory if you want to date a girl

not very old sac joaquin guy wrote:

This I was saying we need to look into blood doping to remove the vaccine.

You need to be able to travel the world,

And you have to be vaccinated,

So basically just get the vaccine and in the same day get all of your blood drawn out

And replaced with the an unvaccinated persons blood

This will allow you to travel and eat in San Francisco and shop at Safeway unmasked, all while secretly functioning with the clean blood of a human

You need to be able to get the blood out in the same day before it makes a full rotation through the heart, because once the gene desequencers have a strong hold there the pure human blood won’t be able to fend of the alien substance and you won’t be able to do this without getting a heart transplant

sbeefyk2 wrote:

Traveling signals two things: 1) you are spontaneous and 2) you have money. Both of which are attractive to women.

They couldn’t care less what you look like if you can take them to the Maldives so they can have you take pictures of them. Notice I said of them, not with them. It’s an important subtlety.

Anyways, it’s not all girls are like that. I would presume she’s around 25 and looking for a sugar daddy.

Eh, I disagree. I've traveled but no one who knows me will ever accuse me of being spontaneous. My trips are very well planned in advance. "Having money" is very relative of course, the ability to travel definitely means you're at least lower middle class, but travel can be done for much cheaper than many people think by flying unpopular routes or at unpopular times, using credit cards wisely, cooking in your accommodation some of the time, etc etc.

still a moron wrote:

Ghuufdcjj wrote:

Whaaaattaf?

Ignore him. He’s a moron.

Too late. Its now trending on TikTok #whyareamericanssostupid #xenophobicamericans #peoplewhoneverleavehome

Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:

busybusy wrote:

Maybe it is mandatory if you want to date that specific girl.

But travelling is a good thing in general. Far too many Americans don't. Why have you never travelled? Where in the world do you want to go?

Yes I'm actually shocked at the amount of people whove never traveled. They're stuck in the same boring place all their lives. It's as if they don't realize there's a whole big world out there. I'd recommend travelling to everyone, at least a few experiences in your adult youth. Life is worth living that way.

like a gypsy wrote:

The trick is to stay only in Europe and the US.

And "loves to travel" is just code for "my parents are rich, you need to be too".

You don't really have to be rich to travel, but point taken that it is a sign of having at least some expendable income. But to that point, a relationship between someone who likes to travel and someone who can't afford to travel (or substitute whatever other moderately expensive hobby one might have) might not be a great fit. Who wants to be on either side of a relationship where person A constantly wants to do things that person B can't afford?

I've dated some very frugal women before. The reality is that it's hard to be compatible in the long term when you have very different financial situations or very different ideas about money. If I want to take a weekend trip with you to NYC and hang out in the city and try a few great restaurants and see a show, and your immediate response is to insist that we take a budget bus, stay in a hotel out in Jersey, and pack a cooler full of lunchmeat so that we don't have to eat out, this probably isn't a setup for a great trip. If our leisure activities routinely follow a similar pattern, our relationship will be strained. Of course if we are 100% compatible in every other way we can probably work through these types of differences, but 99% of the time it will be too much for the relationship to survive.

You gotta put your foot down right from the start or she’ll be dragging you to ALL kinds of bullshiz all over the place, wasting incredible amounts of time and torturing you relentlessly.

Traveling is a way to flex wealth and social status. It’s always been this way.

The rich show their wealth that they have the most leisure time and can afford to take time off and travel.

The amount of people in this thread offended because they’ve never left their cold, boring Midwestern town 😂

depends on where you're travelling to wrote:

My parents took me to Florida as a kid, and the miserable heat and humidity far outweighed any joy that I got from Disney World.

I have been to Florida four times (most recently last month), all in November and December. I would not think of going there in summer or even late spring / early fall.

BTW, there are many good places to visit in Alabama if you are interested in the Civil Rights Movement in 50s and 60s.

I know of at least a handful of girls who loved to travel throughout the world, documenting it all on Instagram, then came home and killed themselves. They couldn't run away from reality forever.

softie1 wrote:

This is because people (women especially) use being “well-traveled” as a proxy for social status.

“Log you say” Yeah I’ve been all over Europe and spent some time in Asia.” You might as well tell your date you’re a good upper middle class boy.

People also equate travel with being interesting. But being well-traveled does not one more interesting. It’s just another form of consumption and status signaling.

You nailed it. There was another travel thread about a month ago that brought defensive WASPs and social climbers out of the woodwork to defend conspicuous travel consumption. These people really think by virtue of the fact they were physically present in a different geographic and cultural location that it imparts upon them some sort of inherent worldliness, cultural refinement, and enlightenment that makes them superior to other people. The sad part are the ones who indebt themselves trying to maintain this charade and when it comes time to pay the piper, they shift from the role of a smug elitist to that of a helpless victim who couldn't have possibly know any better.

surveysays wrote:

People who don’t travel are typically boring, uninspired and ignorant.

This.

snoresvilles wrote:

surveysays wrote:

People who don’t travel are typically boring, uninspired and ignorant.

This.

Actually if you are highly intelligent you have less need for external stimulation like traveling due to a rich inner life. It is just the opposite of what you dullards think.

If she doesn't have any fabulous travel pics of her boyfriend to show her instagram followers, how is she going to build her brand?

Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:

Private jet: 15-50k each way

Hotel resort best room 7 nights: 7k

Drinks and room service: 500 per day

Entertainment expenses: 5k-10k

Gambling profits or expenses: (-200k) to 2.6 million

I'd prefer to go to Mexico and stay at the five diamond hotel or Vegas at the Red Rock Casino but I'd entertain other options for sure.

Post your liver labs. Have you had a liver biopsy?

You really don't need to be wealthy to travel extensively. It all depends on how you do it. If you buy a ticket six to eight months ahead or travel out of season, the airfares can be cheap, especially if you're a student. You can travel via the military or Peace Corps or foreign service or business. You can stay with friends or in cheap places. For instance, it cost about 10 cents a night for food and lodging on the hiking trail around the Annapurnas in Nepal. You can also get round the world or final destination tickets in other countries where you pay for a ticket to some place and then can stop as many times as you want on the way for no extra charge. I did that to get myself from East Africa to Singapore with long stops in Pakistan, India, Nepal, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore (and from there, Indonesia and Malaysia). Beds in a dormitory are cheap. In some countries, like Sweden, you can camp anywhere for free with permission.