Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

Dr. Ford told the truth.

And we just put a rapist on the Supreme Court.

Mary Mahoney told the truth and was killed before it all got out. Does that bother you? Oh no, because it was Hillary and Bill who were suspects. You're an idiot!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I did not say that with regard to Kavanaugh...only Trump. You are adding to your list of wrong statements. I can't even count how many times I've had to correct you with your urban legends you post as true.

Incorrect! Page 32 of the Kavanaugh thread you wrote "I told you so" after stating that he would not be confirmed. The only words you left out were "the biggest." Same result, a Flagpolian Flop and you own it.

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

You said that I said "I will give you the biggest I told you so ever" about Kavanaugh, and I did not. That certainty from me is only with regard to Trump. So, you were wrong again.

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Incorrect! Page 32 of the Kavanaugh thread you wrote "I told you so" after stating that he would not be confirmed. The only words you left out were "the biggest." Same result, a Flagpolian Flop and you own it.

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

You said that I said "I will give you the biggest I told you so ever" about Kavanaugh, and I did not. That certainty from me is only with regard to Trump. So, you were wrong again.

No, you are just like Hillary Clinton, a back peddling liar. You said he would not be confirmed. You don't twist the truth, you just outright lie. Yep, you should have gone into politics, you would have fit right in on the left. Clearly you are lying about your own words. Go away coward!

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip,

Your lying characterization is not closed end. In my previous career I was accused of something I did not do and reacted the same as Kavanaugh. I suppose most genuine people would react similarly. That said, nothing you stated justifies destroying the man based on allegations not supported by one fact.

Igy

Were you accused of the same thing by three different people? Were there then also witnesses to said acts who were not interviewed? Did you then lie to a body trying to (well, pretending to) discover the truth?

agip wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip,

Your lying characterization is not closed end. In my previous career I was accused of something I did not do and reacted the same as Kavanaugh. I suppose most genuine people would react similarly. That said, nothing you stated justifies destroying the man based on allegations not supported by one fact.

Igy

Igy,

I'm not talking about the sex crimes. Forget that. It is not provable.

I'm talking about the many, many other things Kav lied about. And he lied freely, easily and carelessly, including how he saw stolen docs when he worked in the WH. Take your pick of sources.

https://www.google.com/search?q=kavanaugh+lies&oq=kavanaugh+lies&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2183j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

agip,

OK, then the challenge of the nomination should have been based on those facts rather than the nonsense that became the whole affair. It is pretty clear the conspiracy to destroy his character was the sexual alllegations, none supported by facts.

Igy

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip wrote:

Igy,

I'm not talking about the sex crimes. Forget that. It is not provable.

I'm talking about the many, many other things Kav lied about. And he lied freely, easily and carelessly, including how he saw stolen docs when he worked in the WH. Take your pick of sources.

https://www.google.com/search?q=kavanaugh+lies&oq=kavanaugh+lies&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2183j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

agip,

OK, then the challenge of the nomination should have been based on those facts rather than the nonsense that became the whole affair. It is pretty clear the conspiracy to destroy his character was the sexual alllegations, none supported by facts.

Igy

agreed that the Dems blew this thing, massively and inexcusably. Embarassing.

Tinman2 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You said that I said "I will give you the biggest I told you so ever" about Kavanaugh, and I did not. That certainty from me is only with regard to Trump. So, you were wrong again.

No, you are just like Hillary Clinton, a back peddling liar. You said he would not be confirmed. You don't twist the truth, you just outright lie. Yep, you should have gone into politics, you would have fit right in on the left. Clearly you are lying about your own words. Go away coward!

I said he would not be confirmed. I did NOT say what Rigged said I did...so he was wrong again.

Flagpole wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip,

Your lying characterization is not closed end. In my previous career I was accused of something I did not do and reacted the same as Kavanaugh. I suppose most genuine people would react similarly. That said, nothing you stated justifies destroying the man based on allegations not supported by one fact.

Igy

Were you accused of the same thing by three different people? Were there then also witnesses to said acts who were not interviewed? Did you then lie to a body trying to (well, pretending to) discover the truth?

Flagpole,

Come on you must be reasonable person: 1) Swetnick accusation fell apart in television interview and the same with Ramirez, 2) Dr. Ford went to New Jersey to work out her story with Ms. McClean (political operative), 3) Feinstein coordinated attorney choice, 4) Feinstein held the allegation to the last moment for obvious effect, and most important 5) no facts supported any of the claims.

Sorry you are just way too partisan on this issue.

Igy

Flagpole wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip,

Your lying characterization is not closed end. In my previous career I was accused of something I did not do and reacted the same as Kavanaugh. I suppose most genuine people would react similarly. That said, nothing you stated justifies destroying the man based on allegations not supported by one fact.

Igy

Were you accused of the same thing by three different people? Were there then also witnesses to said acts who were not interviewed? Did you then lie to a body trying to (well, pretending to) discover the truth?

Flagpole,

Actually I can say yes to the first two statements. The last sentence is open for interpretation and Inam assuming there were those that thought the sorst of me.

Igy

Democrats sponsored false accusations fail again. Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court and Democrats are still fairies.

Suck on that, you hillary loving pieces of trash.

right wing echo chamber

records matching syntax wrote:

right wing echo chamber

Of course you quote the left wing echo chamber. So let the people decide which echo chamber to listen to.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Of course you quote the left wing echo chamber. So let the people decide which echo chamber to listen to.

You really are a weird dude. Always have to get in the last word. Just can't let anything go out of your warped version of righteousness.

ig weird dude wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Of course you quote the left wing echo chamber. So let the people decide which echo chamber to listen to.

You really are a weird dude. Always have to get in the last word. Just can't let anything go out of your warped version of righteousness.

Huh? How did you get that out of my post?

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/aftermath-as-prologue/

That account doesn't make any sense. Ford had talked to the Washington Post tip line reporter and Representative Eshoo prior to the imagined conspiracy sequence in that account.

Sure it does, the letter was sent to Feinstein on July 30th.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Sure it does, the letter was sent to Feinstein on July 30th.

Stop being such a partisan dupe.

The letter was sent FBI which sat on it.

Likely because Trump told them too.

Then the FBI sent it to Trump.

Then Trump set his operative, Ed Whelan, out to trash the accuser.

Then Trump conducts a fake FBI investigation, limits what they can look into, and what they can release.

Trump is still attacking the accuser.

You would have to be a total idiot to believe Trump did not know the FBI had the letter. And that it was he who told to sit on it. Especially after Trump manipulated the FBI in the final investigation to force them provide the answer he wanted.

60 vote rule wrote:

agip wrote:

...but you are ok with a scotus nominee lying, mocking senators and losing his temper and emotions. Ok.

I hear you on the other things.

The country needs a, cast-in-stone, 60 yes Senate votes requirement for ALL judicial appointments. No more Senate majority leader f'ing around for idiotic political purposes. Also, force a must vote on nominees requirement with a certain number of weeks--the VP would be required to take control of the Senate from the majority leader and force a vote. Also ban "the next president gets to choose" the justices BS.

Sure ask any trumper and they’ll be for that right before Trump is gone, but not right now