This thread was originally titled, "Incredible development in the $612,000 Transcon Goodge run, currently ongoing" but the new title is more descriptive. The description of the run is here.
This run was never in question because people ran with him each step and no data was lost or needed for them to fudge.
All the days of almost perfect data is showing the loss of cadence and HR previously to be obvious cheating and not Garmin/pole issues.
That's the problem with you haters. Everything you don't understand you immediately resort to accusing someone of "cheating". I understand the data and taught you all what to look for and there is nothing in it that indicates "cheating". I've seen it all with the cadence and HR long before you even learned from me how to download the data.
The only thing we have learned from you is that you have no clue what you are saying and constantly talk in circles.
Somehow, this says "van-rider" more clearly than almost anything so far. "Gushers"? Even when this guy is "running" he's not running all that much. Isn't he mostly "poling" at this point?
I havent followed this thread but is it safe to say that the person doing this run has cheated?
Joking aside, PJ's data shows no indication of "cheating" despite what the haters above and their "Excel on a Mac" banker guy have been posting. They didn't even know how to download the data until I taught them and are making very basic mistakes in their "analysis" that are obvious for me to see.
I havent followed this thread but is it safe to say that the person doing this run has cheated?
The data has been suspect because it contains large periods with cadence drops outs (among other things). These only happen when he is running alone, and the data is always fine when people join him whether he is using poles or whatever.
Releasing the Garmin source data would be super helpful in proving his innocence because it isn't simplified like on Strava and contains other important info. What is strange is he refuses to release this.
This leads some to think he has been cheating by riding in the van for short periods of time when nobody else is around. Even 5-10 miles per day is significant in the recovery clock of a transcon. No concrete proof, but the Strava cadence drop outs during the transcon are unlike any of his other runs ever, and if he hasn't cheated it is strange not to release the Garmin data.
Also, Sneakers is a proven troll who doesn't understand data, ignore anything he says and scroll back in the thread if you want proof of his incompetence and constant repetition
The data has been suspect because it contains large periods with cadence drops outs (among other things). These only happen when he is running alone, and the data is always fine when people join him whether he is using poles or whatever.
Releasing the Garmin source data would be super helpful in proving his innocence because it isn't simplified like on Strava and contains other important info. What is strange is he refuses to release this.
This leads some to think he has been cheating by riding in the van for short periods of time when nobody else is around. Even 5-10 miles per day is significant in the recovery clock of a transcon. No concrete proof, but the Strava cadence drop outs during the transcon are unlike any of his other runs ever, and if he hasn't cheated it is strange not to release the Garmin data.
Also, Sneakers is a proven troll who doesn't understand data, ignore anything he says and scroll back in the thread if you want proof of his incompetence and constant repetition
I think you are talking about Rob Pope and him not even being able to make a cadence plot. The full resolution data has always been on Strava and downloadable, same resolution as what's in the Garmin files. Did you miss the lessons I've been giving throughout this thread on how to download the data?
Garmin Inreach Data ≠ Garmin Wearable Data. For reference PK inreach data from his world record run is still visable. Odd that we've never seen the actual inreach tracking data for PJ but who cares at this point really.
I havent followed this thread but is it safe to say that the person doing this run has cheated?
Joking aside, PJ's data shows no indication of "cheating" despite what the haters above and their "Excel on a Mac" banker guy have been posting. They didn't even know how to download the data until I taught them and are making very basic mistakes in their "analysis" that are obvious for me to see.