astro wrote:
You are trolling but again, feel free to wallow in the mire that is the shameful HU scandal as those nitwits try to emulate Shelby Houlihan while fooling no one. Bye.
Put Wiley and KT in a 1500 race. Wiley trounces her. KT finishes 50 meters behind her.
Again take it up with the IAAF and World Athletics. Feel free to picket outside their office. As to lying, you want to whitewash the most inglorious scandal in the sport just to troll. I guess it's a living.
semi / astro / gorun / troll patrol / turbo kick wrote:
Astro is the only one of your accounts that acts sane.
LOL! I’m not any of those accounts. I’m just a big fan of running and a former athlete.
I must confess, as my screen name implies, I do have another hobby though. I eat trolls for breakfast😉
You seem to have difficulty understanding basic English. I said that it is not a conversion. So you come back and say the same thing but say that I didn't understand.
astro wrote:
Again take it up with the IAAF and World Athletics. Feel free to picket outside their office. As to lying, you want to whitewash the most inglorious scandal in the sport just to troll. I guess it's a living.
What is our response to the fact that your lovely princess who is all-world NCAA would get trounced by a runner who is slumming in the NAIA?
This post was removed.
I'm just stating a fact. Sorry.
This quoted post has been removed.
No shame in being a run-of-the-mill runner as KT. Wiley has taken it to the next level.
track news wrote:
A point system is not a conversion. Do you really not understand this? The mile is run infrequently as compared to the 1500 so there are very few data points. The conversion puts her at 4:04. Imagine had she run 4:01 1500 and her mile PR was 4:30 and I told you that her 1500 converted only to a 4:24? You would have lost your mind. That's 23 seconds for 109 meters.
You bring up a good point, which may, after further investigation, explain why the WA point system conversion is an inferior method when compared to determine equivalency based on fractionalization of aerobic power, using the Jack Daniels Calculator.
astro wrote:
Somebody doesn't read. World athletic and the IAAF provide a pretty detailed explanation. Take it up with them.
Where is the link to this “pretty detailed explanation”?
Is that English? Cannot comment on something that never happened. And didn't Wiley lose to Pourde at Drake Relays? I guess that is as good a metric as any to compare running with epo/steroid and without. The entire HU scandal is a blight on the sport and a disgrace. And the joke is that even with epo and steroids Wiley would still probably lose. Anyway, there is an entire thread discussing the HU scandal. Take this inglorious subject there.
Does the IAAF allow for conversions to qualify in the 1500?
astro wrote:
Is that English? Cannot comment on something that never happened. And didn't Wiley lose to Pourde at Drake Relays? I guess that is as good a metric as any to compare running with epo/steroid and without. The entire HU scandal is a blight on the sport and a disgrace. And the joke is that even with epo and steroids Wiley would still probably lose. Anyway, there is an entire thread discussing the HU scandal. Take this inglorious subject there.
Kate Tuoy has had a great collegiate career. An enjoyable one with many fond memories. I really don't think she will do anything special on the world special. Again, she should cheris h her memories.
Her fans will continue creating threads here after she retires next year.
Cool. Anyway you have to work on your sockpuppetry and trolling skills. You suck.
What part of his post do you not agree with? He parroted what you state constantly. You tell us what a great college career she had and that you have to dope to make it on the world level and she isn't willing to do it. If he is trolling then so are you because you state the same things.
astro wrote:
Cool. Anyway you have to work on your sockpuppetry and trolling skills. You suck.
Top collegiate runners like joe Falcon, Teare and Hocker ran times about 4 seconds of the WR. Kate Tuhoy is 16 seconds of the WR.
But, but, but, she is little Katelyn. She will improve more than any man. She has always been faster than anybody not older.....well except until this week. But that doesn't count. And if she doesn't go pro, she will always be the best just because she could have been. She will do great things in a cubicle. I will follow her forever.
Maybe it is time to look up human biology.
KT will enjoy a great pro career after a great NCAA career and will continue to be a bright spot in the sport. Your latest troll bait will continue to be a shameful cautionary tale while mired in scandal, fraud and opprobrium. Sorry.
This post was removed.