Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Extremely temporary. Not a long-term thing at all. The economy is just too good, and almost none of it has to do with Trump.

It would take at least 2-3 years to get back to where the markets are today.

Which is normal. Markets are cyclical; they always have been.

Ok, thanks, and you are correct, but I'd like to keep this thread about the horribleness that is Trump.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Extremely temporary. Not a long-term thing at all. The economy is just too good, and almost none of it has to do with Trump.

It would take at least 2-3 years to get back to where the markets are today.

No chance. We have such a low unemployment rate right now that companies are having a hard time hiring people, and that trend was on its way under Obama and has nothing to do with Trump...didn't have anything to do with Obama either...just the economic cycle following a horrible recession and an aging population.

The markets will go down right when it happens (and it's happening...impeachment and removal or resignation), but it will go back up very shortly afterwards. If it goes down a lot, I'm going to throw a big chunk in the market...I don't do that often.

Flagpole wrote:

Bradley Cousons wrote:

It would take at least 2-3 years to get back to where the markets are today.

No chance. We have such a low unemployment rate right now that companies are having a hard time hiring people, and that trend was on its way under Obama and has nothing to do with Trump...didn't have anything to do with Obama either...just the economic cycle following a horrible recession and an aging population.

The markets will go down right when it happens (and it's happening...impeachment and removal or resignation), but it will go back up very shortly afterwards. If it goes down a lot, I'm going to throw a big chunk in the market...I don't do that often.

Sorry. You are wrong here.

Flagpole wrote:

Long Time Dude wrote:

Flagpole ,

I just wanted to let you know that I remember the nutrition thread this guy is talking about and you were completely correct on that topic. You know it's true since he's holding a grudge for all this time. He knows that he was soundly beaten in that debate.

Ok, thanks, and you are correct, but I'd like to keep this thread about the horribleness that is Trump.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

I remember that thread too.

You totally smashed that guy.

He went home with his tail between his legs and now he's back claiming he was right?

Sheesh. Chalk it up to being a millennial, I guess.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

If he were to be impeached, there would be a huge crash (or significant long term correction). If you think otherwise, you are a fool.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

It would take at least 2-3 years to get back to where the markets are today.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Sorry. You are wrong here.

^ Absolutely nothing of any value provided. Just author Trumper scarred that their Orange Hero does not actually control the world.

U R WRONG, Troll wrote:

Bradley Cousons wrote:

If he were to be impeached, there would be a huge crash (or significant long term correction). If you think otherwise, you are a fool.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

It would take at least 2-3 years to get back to where the markets are today.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Sorry. You are wrong here.

^ Absolutely nothing of any value provided. Just author Trumper scarred that their Orange Hero does not actually control the world.

Odd that a Trumper would state:

" Unfortunately, he needs to be impeached."

L L wrote:

You missed one possibility.

Resignation

Nixon resigned before an impeachment vote was held to avoid the embarrassment of being impeached.

Maybe Clinton should have resigned before facing his trial.

A Senate trial after impeachment is going to bring a lot of the Mueller facts to light. We don't know everything now, but we would find out in a trial.

If there is some bad stuff in there, Trump could resign to save face.

And the politics of a vote for conviction could change. Right now you're not going to get 15-20 Republican senators to vote to convict. But that could change as more details come out.

In fact, even though he is stubborn, I'd bet that Trump would resign before taking an impeachment conviction and being forced out.

I don't think the makeup of the Senate will change enough for a conviction on impeachment.

However, in terms of resignation, I can see that as a longshot possibility at this point. One thing Trump is going to fear is not disclosure about crimes or alleged crimes. That is what his real net worth is. His net worth, in my opinion, is likely nowhere near where he advertises it as and that a true number far below that as a revelation could make him act sooner rather than later to prevent it from coming out. However, my assumption is that it is going to come out nearly no matter what and Trump has known this for quite a while now. It is the personal financial information I think Trump fears the most. Net worth, obligations to banks worldwide including Russia, etc.

PIO! wrote:

U R WRONG, Troll wrote:

^ Absolutely nothing of any value provided. Just author Trumper scarred that their Orange Hero does not actually control the world.

Odd that a Trumper would state:

" Unfortunately, he needs to be impeached."

It was a very weak attempt at deflection. Try again, name thief.

35480

U R WRONG wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Odd that a Trumper would state:

" Unfortunately, he needs to be impeached."

It was a very weak attempt at deflection. Try again, name thief.

Ah, I see that you do not have two functioning brain cells. Understood.

The Fokus wrote:

I don't think the makeup of the Senate will change enough for a conviction on impeachment.

Please stop listening to Fox News which has brainwashed Trumpsters into believing the 67 Democrats are needed to impeach Trump. There are already 12-15 Republicans who will vote to impeach hm. And that was before T3 (Trump's Terrible Tuesday).

PIO! wrote:

Ah, I see that you I do not have ANY functioning brain cells. Understood.

^ Indeed.

Trump’s National Enquirer Allies Are the Latest to Defect

National Enquirer publisher David Pecker—a longtime ally of President Donald Trump—has essentially corroborated former Michael Cohen’s account that the president directed him to make illegal campaign contributions in 2016 to pay for the silence Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/08/donald-trump-national-enquirer-allies-defect-david-pecker-michael-cohen

Likewise I thought the National Enquirer goons would be the last to turn on Trump. After all, they were willingly manipulating one story after another throughout 2016 at the direction of Trump himself. When Trump felt threatened by Cruz, National Enquirer would take dictation from Trump and invent a hit piece on Cruz. And so forth. Throughout the fall also. The Enquirer was Trump's attack dog on command, and those genius white housewife shoppers were seeing the headlines and actually believing it was real.

Jeff Sessions just basically told Trump to shut up and understand how the government works. It was like scolding a petulant child. These Manafort and Cohen developments have finally emboldened some Republicans to wake up and speak up, although the vast majority of them remain petrified and silent.

After all, conservatives live in fear.

Flagpole wrote:

Is there any high-profile Trump supporter who isn't a huge a$$hole?

https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/23/media/paris-dennard-allegations-cnn/index.html

Wow- another huge coincidence I'm sure- Just a few days after embarrassing Phil Mudd on prime time TV, by implying that the security clearance outrage is incredibly misplaced, and that these former intelligence guys make money after leaving their agencies largely because of their clearances, all of a sudden CNN decides to look into something that Dennard has already been punished for back in 2014.

For those of you who didn't see it, go watch the video of Mudd vs Dennard. Mudd seriously becomes "unhinged", and keeps neglecting to answer Dennard's question. As Dennard states, everyone in DC (actually everyone everywhere) knows this is the case. It's just common sense, frankly. But Mudd flips out, and starts acting like he's aggressively interrogating Dennard, yelling "I'LL GIVE YOU ONE ANSWER!!- AND YOU'VE GOT 10 SECONDS!!" WTF?! Dennard keeps his cool the entire time, by the way. Mudd looked like a fool. Out of control mad men is what these former CIA/FBI leaders are when things aren't going their way.

So what do you know, now CNN thinks it's necessary to re-open interest into an incident in which Dennard was ultimately let go from at ASU. This is what Trump Derangement Syndrome does to you. You can't handle anything not going your way, you freak out for no reason, and then go to extremes to try to "be proven right" about something.

Sound familiar, Clownpole?

Mueller never.

Clownpole forever.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

No chance. We have such a low unemployment rate right now that companies are having a hard time hiring people, and that trend was on its way under Obama and has nothing to do with Trump...didn't have anything to do with Obama either...just the economic cycle following a horrible recession and an aging population.

The markets will go down right when it happens (and it's happening...impeachment and removal or resignation), but it will go back up very shortly afterwards. If it goes down a lot, I'm going to throw a big chunk in the market...I don't do that often.

Sorry. You are wrong here.

Well, we will see. Trump will be impeached and convicted and removed OR he will resign. Just one more thing I will be proven right about.

Bradley Cousons wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

No chance. We have such a low unemployment rate right now that companies are having a hard time hiring people, and that trend was on its way under Obama and has nothing to do with Trump...didn't have anything to do with Obama either...just the economic cycle following a horrible recession and an aging population.

The markets will go down right when it happens (and it's happening...impeachment and removal or resignation), but it will go back up very shortly afterwards. If it goes down a lot, I'm going to throw a big chunk in the market...I don't do that often.

Sorry. You are wrong here.

Whatever. I'm not going respond to you anymore on this topic.

Let's get back on topic.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

The people are lining up to spill the dirt on Trump. He's done (and has been for a long time as I have correctly pointed out). Now David Pecker has been granted immunity! Good freakin' grief, even I didn't think he would be attacked from so many sides. It is going to keep coming too. The snowball has started.

The Senate will have no choice but to convict, but Trump will likely resign. The reason you gave will be a secondary reason. The main reason he will do it is that it will be part of a plea bargain to keep him out of jail or greatly limit any jail time.

Mueller is coming (and damn is he close).

The clown is done.