Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

XY wrote:

YZ wrote:

You have no clue how the "payoff" was made. The method is illegal. The source of the money is also illegal.

Neither do you. The source of the money is not illegal. The method may not be illegal

Most of all, you have no clue what you are writing about. The claim of " to protect his family" doesn't fly.

Using campaign money IS ILLEGAL. The method IS ILEGAL.

Now, crawl back into your troll hole.

YZ wrote:

XY wrote:

Neither do you. The source of the money is not illegal. The method may not be illegal

Most of all, you have no clue what you are writing about. The claim of " to protect his family" doesn't fly.

Using campaign money IS ILLEGAL. The method IS ILEGAL.

Now, crawl back into your troll hole.

What? Where are you getting that the payment was campaign money?

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

So much losing. Pardons are the new winning!!!

I'm just so impressed with Mueller. Watching his progression has been like watching a master chess player playing against a child. He got a bunch of people to flip (and most likely got all the evidence he needs), he goes after Trump's mate knowing he'll get a conviction. Now trump has two plays left, both are losing moves. He pardons and looks guilty as heck and puts himself in legal jeopardy, or he doesn't pardon sending a clear message to everyone that's ever interacted with him that he's not coming to your rescue and you're on your own thus raising the probability of future flips by witnesses.

Flagpole called it!

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

Blowhard wrote:

You typed a lot of words, yet didn’t say anything.

lol

GREAT comeback. I know, I know, you can only comprehend sound bites or slogans. The first half of my post was a quote, by the way, not my words.

How about my last post? Much fewer words. Did you understand any of that? I can dumb it down to a Trump voter (no HS degree) level if you'd like?

Could you at least stop butchering the English language. ESL?

Noticer of dominance wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

So much losing. Pardons are the new winning!!!

I'm just so impressed with Mueller. Watching his progression has been like watching a master chess player playing against a child. He got a bunch of people to flip (and most likely got all the evidence he needs), he goes after Trump's mate knowing he'll get a conviction. Now trump has two plays left, both are losing moves. He pardons and looks guilty as heck and puts himself in legal jeopardy, or he doesn't pardon sending a clear message to everyone that's ever interacted with him that he's not coming to your rescue and you're on your own thus raising the probability of future flips by witnesses.

Flagpole called it!

Oh no, Flagpole, please don't start up with that "Noticer of dominance" sh!t again. It was embarrassing enough the first time.

FFF wrote:

Kenneth Starr investigated two years, and his task was looking into the "Whitewater" land deal.

We ended up with Monica Lewinsky.

Get a grip, Trumpdeniers.

So much whataboutism.

Noticer of dominance wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

So much losing. Pardons are the new winning!!!

I'm just so impressed with Mueller. Watching his progression has been like watching a master chess player playing against a child. He got a bunch of people to flip (and most likely got all the evidence he needs), he goes after Trump's mate knowing he'll get a conviction. Now trump has two plays left, both are losing moves. He pardons and looks guilty as heck and puts himself in legal jeopardy, or he doesn't pardon sending a clear message to everyone that's ever interacted with him that he's not coming to your rescue and you're on your own thus raising the probability of future flips by witnesses.

Flagpole called it!

Hi Flagpole.

Too bad you were not this first to call this.

I doubt Trump is removed from office, just like Hillary faced no consequences for her behavior. The rich and powerful get a pass. Too many folks divided and on either side of the debate. Interesting to say the least.

Hate to say it (not really), but “I told you so.”

I told you before election night how this was going to go down. So far I’m right.

RJWilson wrote:

So far I’m right.

And I've been wrong, about something kind of important. I've suggested that SDNY would be dangerous for various people, when I really should have said that the New York *State* courts would be dangerous--because pardons for federal offenses don't apply to state criminal proceedings. SDNY is a federal district court. Sorry about that.

By the way, if you see a reference to "New York Supreme Court" . . . that's the lowest level of court in NYS. The highest court in NYS is the Court of Appeals. Go figure.

Thankless job wrote:

Great job, Mueller.

So much money and time spent on another white collar criminal.

Sheesh.

Really? Just allow white collar criminals to steal? Especially ones associated with a criminal president and his campaign?

Money well spent.

XY wrote:

agip wrote:

Trump will be found guilty of tax evasion and bank fraud.

maybe not by mueller, maybe by NY State.

Yes, the Southern District of NY is the entity most likely to find Trump in violation. I really can’t think of a scenario where Trump could be proven guilty under muellers authority.

Would you consider a scathing report from Mueller to Congress that leads to his impeachment and conviction being proven guilty?

SDNY wrote:

Mueller won’t touch Trump. Anyone who thinks differently has a tiny brain.

SDNY? That’s where he’s going down.

Define what you mean here. You don't think Mueller will give a report on Trump that leads to his impeachment and conviction or resignation?

Flagpole wrote:

XY wrote:

Yes, the Southern District of NY is the entity most likely to find Trump in violation. I really can’t think of a scenario where Trump could be proven guilty under muellers authority.

Would you consider a scathing report from Mueller to Congress that leads to his impeachment and conviction being proven guilty?

To a republican congress? “Scathing” will get dissected and diluted. Impeachment not in the cards

Silly Willy wrote:

What you crazed TDS folks don't understand is we don't think these guys are Boy Scouts.....

Post Flagged for improper use of TDS. Please use terms properly folks.

For reference from earlier in this thread—the proper use of TDS is outlined below.

Official LRC sactioner of terminology wrote:

Why...bless your heart! wrote:

LOL!!! Seriously Hardloper?!?! Wow.

I am starting to buy in to the concept of so-called “Trump derangement syndrome” but it’s not Trump’s critics that are suffering from this ailment. It’s his hardcore followers.

Correct! Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) refers to the disconnect between rationale / reality based thought and the political beliefs of Trump supporters. The term, thus, correctly applied ONLY refers to the beliefs of hardcore Trumpers. Everyone agrees.

Your welcome. Moran.

You are so hopeful and ignorant. I suppose you would have to be ignorant to be so hopeful. Do you even read about this or listen to any reputable news about this? Just answer than in your own head. I'm not really interested in your answer.

I take a few days off from this thread the libs and the media are already taking victory laps as if it was the week before Election day 2016. Trump isn't going anywhere.

Manafort had been charged with 18 counts, he has been found guilty of 8 of them and there was a mistrial on 10 of them. None of the 18 charges had anything to do with Trump or Russia.

Didn't the Obama campaign take $1.8 million in illegal contributions in 2008 and people barely even talked about it? And he was fined for it.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/07/obama-campaign-fined-big-for-hiding-donors-keeping-illegal-donations

No Russian collusion

Nothing to do with the Trump campaign

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Flagpole will skirt around that. This is all political motivation and it’s sad. I hope he pardons both Cohen and Manafort.

present, esq. wrote:

Manafort acquittal wrote:

Manafort not guilty of all charges!!!!

Nice try, but the jury won't resume deliberations until Monday.

But yes, if he's acquitted on all charges we'll be sure to give you credit for having called it first.

Oh, so close--you gave it a good shot!