Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

The MASSIVE failure in your logic is that you don’t think anything you say about the left applies to the right. If you stuck your head out of Trump’s large a$$hole for just one second you’d be able to realize that Trump runs the show and the GOP is in full control of the government. That’s not disputable. So in terms of who are actually demonized and holding less power there is zero question they are on the left. As a politics group, you are not in the position to be the victim right now, period. Now if you expect people on the left to like white supremacist sympathizers and anyone who supports trump then you are just a fvxking idiot for obvious reasons.

I agree with this 100%.

Timothy Foyle wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

I'm trying to get you to understand what's happening so that maybe you will try to stop it as well. I am using what's left of my free speech to fight for what's left of my free speech.

Who on the Left is trying to defuse the hatred?

It's not that we are laughing with you, Gary. We're laughing at you.

[ahem . . . cough, cough . . . ]

Oh, I mean, YES. THAT'S RIGHT! YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS WHAT'S GOING ON. SAVE US FROM THE DEEP STATE, GARY! SAVE US!!!

Hmmm. More hate speech coming from my Leftist friends. Shouldn't this be blacklisted?

Isn't expressing a desire to punch a Nazi an expression of hate? Shouldn't that be blacklisted too?

More hilarity from FOX News: How is Donald Trump supposed to talk to Robert Mueller if he can't lie?

This was actually argued on the air.

“How in the world could he ever cooperate, and sit down with Mueller for an interview, knowing that if you tell one lie to Bob Mueller, he will move to file charges?” co-host Dagen McDowell asked.

“He could not tell a lie,” suggested Democratic strategist Jessica Tarlov. “That’s always an option.”

https://shareblue.com/trump-talk-mueller-lie-perjury-fox-mcdowell-outnumbered/

DiscoGary wrote:

Hmmm. More hate speech coming from my Leftist friends. Shouldn't this be blacklisted?

Isn't expressing a desire to punch a Nazi an expression of hate? Shouldn't that be blacklisted too?

Isn't the desire to eliminate a group of people an expression of hate? This isn't one sided. You are backing a group of people that murdered 10 million people. Nazi punks fvck off

swerve wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Hmmm. More hate speech coming from my Leftist friends. Shouldn't this be blacklisted?

Isn't expressing a desire to punch a Nazi an expression of hate? Shouldn't that be blacklisted too?

Isn't the desire to eliminate a group of people an expression of hate? This isn't one sided. You are backing a group of people that murdered 10 million people. Nazi punks fvck off

Gary has taken a royal beating here lately - no wonder he feels like a victim.

... hate speech against Nazis is an oxymoron. There is no legitimate defence for Nazism. The movement was expressly about hatred of non-Aryan, or “unusual” sorts, and comprised a program to exterminate millions of humans. Nazis get no sympathy from thinking humans when they are victimized by “hate speech,” because the term has no logical application for Nazis.

DG will say this is a slippery slope, where do you draw the line? It’s not slippery at all... the line is clear and sharp and divides Nazis from all the rest of imperfect humanity.

DiscoGary wrote:

I'm trying to get you to understand what's happening so that maybe you will try to stop it as well. I am using what's left of my free speech to fight for what's left of my free speech.

Who on the Left is trying to defuse the hatred?

You seem to use your freedom of speech just fine. I'm not sure how it's "vanishing" other than it's not okay to be racist or violent despite given permission for both by Trump.

What are you looking for as evidence "the Left" is defusing the hatred? If you stop watching fox news and reading briedbard, you'd find plenty of examples.

Awsi Dooger wrote:

More hilarity from FOX News: How is Donald Trump supposed to talk to Robert Mueller if he can't lie?

This was actually argued on the air.

“How in the world could he ever cooperate, and sit down with Mueller for an interview, knowing that if you tell one lie to Bob Mueller, he will move to file charges?” co-host Dagen McDowell asked.

“He could not tell a lie,” suggested Democratic strategist Jessica Tarlov. “That’s always an option.”

https://shareblue.com/trump-talk-mueller-lie-perjury-fox-mcdowell-outnumbered/

And we haven't even reached peak stupidity yet!

From where I sit... wrote:

... hate speech against Nazis is an oxymoron. There is no legitimate defence for Nazism. The movement was expressly about hatred of non-Aryan, or “unusual” sorts, and comprised a program to exterminate millions of humans. Nazis get no sympathy from thinking humans when they are victimized by “hate speech,” because the term has no logical application for Nazis.

DG will say this is a slippery slope, where do you draw the line? It’s not slippery at all... the line is clear and sharp and divides Nazis from all the rest of imperfect humanity.

Unlike Gary, I don’t sympathize with the sub-human Nazi types. On this front, I am in agreement with German laws forbidding most Nazi propaganda as it clearly promotes hate. So I am for more limited free speech. The slippery slope argument is an old tool used on and by knuckleheads who can’t think through complexity, they just see black and white all around them. We have constraints on most freedoms, no matter how basic, and for good reasons.

All that aside, Gary wants us all to like and respect white supremacists. He’s never going to get that because most of us think they are sub-human scum. That of course does not mean I will default to physical assault. That’s where it “does not compute” for Gary.

Democrats are fairies.

SuckerpunchXguyTheRealOne wrote:

swerve wrote:

Isn't the desire to eliminate a group of people an expression of hate? This isn't one sided. You are backing a group of people that murdered 10 million people. Nazi punks fvck off

Gary has taken a royal beating here lately - no wonder he feels like a victim.

Gary even had his alter-ego, Geo M, come into a thread the post #1 states is not moderated (per a note from the boros) and had a yuge number of post deleted. Anything that claims Gary is Geo. . . . a predictable act by someone who believes they are never wrong.

From where I sit... wrote:

... hate speech against Nazis is an oxymoron. There is no legitimate defence for Nazism. The movement was expressly about hatred of non-Aryan, or “unusual” sorts, and comprised a program to exterminate millions of humans. Nazis get no sympathy from thinking humans when they are victimized by “hate speech,” because the term has no logical application for Nazis.

DG will say this is a slippery slope, where do you draw the line? It’s not slippery at all... the line is clear and sharp and divides Nazis from all the rest of imperfect humanity.

No, it is not a slippery slope. It is a sheer cliff and Liberals have jumped straight off it.

Liberals can see no line at all between real Nazis and Trump and his supporters.

Trollminator wrote:

...

All that aside, Gary wants us all to like and respect white supremacists.

...

Nope. Never said that. I expect you to protect their civil rights including their right to free speech no matter how much you hate them. I expect you to understand that once we start depriving one group of their rights that the rights of all are threatened.

I think it’s the opposite. You’re classifying every Democrat as one group and playing the victim.

Trump is separating families and Stephen Miller is making it harder for LEGAL immigrants to stay in America. Trump is not condemning white nationalists who literally murdered a woman on the opposite side. They are white nationalists and xenophobic. If you stand with them you stand with hate

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Just FYI, the Supreme Court has determined that there is no such thing as "hate speech" and that other than to incite violence or panic, basically all speech, no matter how vile and hate filled, is protected.

Uh-oh. Is Flagpole coming down on the side of protecting free speech for Nazis?

Of course. Guaranteed by the Constitution. Can't pick and choose what you like and what you don't, and this one is pretty clear, and I 100% agree with it. Free speech means just that, no matter how vile it may be.

Again, can't incite to panic or violence in your speech, and if you slander you can get sued, but you can talk about hating someone all you want...guaranteed by the Constitution.

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Uh-oh. Is Flagpole coming down on the side of protecting free speech for Nazis?

Of course. Guaranteed by the Constitution. Can't pick and choose what you like and what you don't, and this one is pretty clear, and I 100% agree with it. Free speech means just that, no matter how vile it may be.

Again, can't incite to panic or violence in your speech, and if you slander you can get sued, but you can talk about hating someone all you want...guaranteed by the Constitution.

Well I'm getting all misty eyed here. My old Liberal nemesis rises to the occasion and makes a stand for free speech. Well done sir!

Credit must be given where credit is due and so I tip my hat to Flagpole for taking an unpopular stand on this. Of course it would be nice if you would join the battle but I'll take what I can get.

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Of course. Guaranteed by the Constitution. Can't pick and choose what you like and what you don't, and this one is pretty clear, and I 100% agree with it. Free speech means just that, no matter how vile it may be.

Again, can't incite to panic or violence in your speech, and if you slander you can get sued, but you can talk about hating someone all you want...guaranteed by the Constitution.

Well I'm getting all misty eyed here. My old Liberal nemesis rises to the occasion and makes a stand for free speech. Well done sir!

Credit must be given where credit is due and so I tip my hat to Flagpole for taking an unpopular stand on this. Of course it would be nice if you would join the battle but I'll take what I can get.

Free speech and the First Amendment is long a liberal love. I'm a former journalist and so of course am for free speech. Donald Trump is very much an enemy of free speech. The press is a check on people in power. Just like the ACLU often defends vile people, you have to be for free speech for everyone if you have any integrity.

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Well I'm getting all misty eyed here. My old Liberal nemesis rises to the occasion and makes a stand for free speech. Well done sir!

Credit must be given where credit is due and so I tip my hat to Flagpole for taking an unpopular stand on this. Of course it would be nice if you would join the battle but I'll take what I can get.

Free speech and the First Amendment is long a liberal love. I'm a former journalist and so of course am for free speech. Donald Trump is very much an enemy of free speech. The press is a check on people in power. Just like the ACLU often defends vile people, you have to be for free speech for everyone if you have any integrity.

And so ... with the power vested in me by my ability to see the world as it really is ... I declare Flagpole to be a lower case "liberal" with all the respect and privileges that come with the title. He shall retain this title until such time that he discards it of his accord by uttering something illiberal. Crank up the disco music and let the celebration begin!

You are right about that. Protesting is a huge liberal thing. Most are unemployed, relying on welfare and have nothing to do all day. Republicans rarely protest but they will consistently show up on Election Day.

I never heard the President say anything negative about protesting. He just attacks cnn and msnbc for pretending they are giving the news. It’s all propaganda and a soap opera at this point.