All this physical morphology talk is rubbish. It does not prove she is clean, nor does it even suggest she’s clean.
(For the record, I see no reason to suspect her of using at this time,)
Dolt comes along in the sprints, and can’t hack it because he’s too tall—massive back problems even in the 2, and no possibilities in the 100. Conventional wisdom was that he was too tall.
Put him un an unrestricted program, and bam!—now the conventional wisdom is that he is great BECAUSE he is tall! Completely absurd. He was not fast because he was tall, he was fast DESPITE his being tall.
Best sprinters now:
CC...5-9
ADG...5-10
Bromell...5-8
Baker...5-10
Laird...5-7?
Su...5-8
And lots of these are optimistic. Back to old conventional wisdom. But is it reality?
The reality is that in the era of drugs, you never know. Morphology means nothing.
Mu is great, until such time as the full constellation of indicators appears. Running fast is only one indicator, and at her speeds, a weak one, and totally insufficient. Even her progression is smooth, taking off 3 seconds per year, consistently.
IMO there is almost NOTHING to see here atm, except an excellent young woman athlete with a beautifully fluid stride.