Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Of course, if Trump has done nothing wrong, he has nothing to fear.
L L wrote:
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far.
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
EPlC Fail wrote:
Life is so much more than "Trump"..... well, for those of us on this side- LOLOLOL!!)
"LOLOLOL!!" ? Seriously? That wasn't even mildly amusing. And for someone who has a life that is "so much more than Trump," you regularly regurgitate every single possible right wing spin talking point regarding his "successes". You seem pretty obsessed actually.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: .....and to this day, there are still ZERO indictments of US citizens for colluuuuuussion related to the 2016 presidential election. Also ZERO indictments for obstruction of justice. WOW. And Mueller has stated that he doesn't even plan on indicting Trump! ..... We can get to the hard evidence in no time.
1) the investigation is hardly over. Don't celebrate quite yet
2) These investigations always take time. No, hard "evidence" isn't always gotten in "no time."
3) As far as Mueller not "even plan(ning) on indicting Trump!" , who said that, Guiliani?? Now THAT deserves a "LOLOLOL!!!" Guy lies and contradicts himself constantly.
4) Even if Mueller follows DOJ opinion, and will not indict Trump, it doesn't mean he can't-
a) let Rosenstein do it, or
b) issue a report detailing all of Trump's crimes, which obviously would result in impeachment. Hardly a "win" for Trump.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote:The Strzok testimony earlier this month was absolutely hilarious. Strange dude. . Basically taking the "nothing I said actually means anything.....ever" position.
Isn't that Trump's and his supporters' defense of all the idiotic, racist, raving things that Trump says every day? That what he says doesn't mean anything? only judge him on actions? Riiight.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: It was great to see him called out for ruining two marriages
How many marriages (his own) has Trump "ruined" with his cheating ? Soon to be 3 when Melania leaves him. EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: The Putin meeting was the climax of the month for the Libs. "Treasonous" and "Traitor" were thrown around by the most crazed . But the fact of the matter nothing said at the meeting meets anything close to those definitions. These guys are extreme, Flagpole-esque butthurt.
Um, hey idiot, Trump and his supporters called Dems "treasonous" for not clapping for him at his SOTU address. Now THAT was idiotic. EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote:Moving to topics that actually matter to most Americans, the economy continues to accelerate.
Wow, one really good quarter. It's early yet (and many economists think the growth was a **temporary** boost from trade war, other countries buying before our tariffs went to effect. Now that they are in place.....good luck!). Obama, who you right wingers regularly claimed had the worst economy ever under him had several quarters over 4% (including one well over 5%). I don't recall you celebrating then and stating what an economic genius Obama was, did you? Nope. EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: The tariff negotiating tactic seems to be working (remember, this is a tactic the Left would historically be in favor of, as their former constituency was the labor/middle class/poor working class).
.
1) An extremely high majority of economists, conservative and left leaning, think Trump's trade war is a bad idea, and that he has no strategy behind it. Period.
2) While conservatives have been, historically, somewhat more supportive of free trade than liberals, there have been protectionist, and free trade, members of both groups for a long time (read your history bro')
3) The majority of current Dem voters live in big cities that do well with and support free trade/globalization. The real hypocrisy is that the supposed free trade republican party is now backing, despite their big concerns, Trump's stupid trade war.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: North Korea has shown progress in dismantling their nuclear sites.
We have no more reason to trust North Korea now than we did in the past. Trump got nothing from them but a handshake and a photo-op. We have less proof/reason to trust them than we do/did with Iran, who Trump and Repubs didn't trust at all, despite verifiable agreements that contained WAY more inspection/oversight than we have now with North Korea.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote: The illegal immigration / family separation issue has died down a bit, as many realized it was political selective outrage.
Not really, his own damn daughter just said she was vehemently against the policy and that the issue was the "low point" of the administration for her.
EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote:Trump's RCP approval remains steady at 43.5 at the moment.
More like 41%, and with a NEGATIVE 11.4% approval/disapproval. Obama was PLUS 3 at this point (despite dealing with fall out from Great Recession). That's a FIFTEEN point difference.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/EPIC Fail.
EPlC Fail wrote:I'm still waiting on that big infrastructure bill that we were supposed to see a while back. Perhaps it'll be rolled out pre-midterms to use for select campaigns.
LOL. Don't hold your breath!
EPlC Fail wrote:Mueller isn't coming (his words).
He didn't say that. I know, Alternate Facts are ok for repubs. (he may not indict, but he is still working and coming at Trump. Wonder what he found in his Tax Returns????? Nervous? Bet you and The Don are! )
And one last point: how are you feeling about the TRILLION $ DEFICITS (due to Trump tax cut for rich and Big Corps, AND big spending bill) that we will be facing every year for the foreseeable future?? Right wing hypocrisy on this issue is breathtaking. You guys constantly brutalized Obama and dems for such debt and deficits, and exorbitant spending. But now?? Crickets.
Lying, pathetic, hypocrites. Disgusting.
Your post was one heaping, steaming, dishonest, disconnected from reality, pile of EPIC FAIL .
Look!
Flagpole has a new handle.
What's up Flaggy?
L L wrote:
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
What is Manfort's sentence?
Hey, I thought we already won North Korea.
So much winning!
Flagpole wrote:
The Real Rico wrote:
Rico Cooper disagrees.
Ah...Rico, you own me $40.
So, since you are seemingly enjoying yourself with this Rico Cooper thing, I have decided that I WILL give you a thread from more than 15 years ago where I mentioned Rico Cooper as my blues keyboard teacher.
Here you go:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?board=1&id=161724&thread=159652#161724For those of you who knew the poster "Brutal" at that time, I was just mainly having some fun with him in his own style in that thread and I fully admit it was a bit jerky, maybe even more than a bit...but by design...Brutal was a decent guy actually, but just a bit jerky, and I was just having fun matching up with his ridiculous way of posting.
So, the question for you The Real Rico, do you believe that I fabricated a blues keyboard teacher back in 2003 that I still cling to today, or do you think that perhaps Rico Cooper is a real guy? I've said I don't lie. He's a real dude and he taught me well.
Nothin' like a middle aged, fat, bald white guy who thinks he is good at playing blues. LOL
Blind Lemon Flagpole wrote:
some worthless nonsense
Most lemons are blind.
Just thought you should know.
raw bribery
which republicans are totally fine with.
but the constitution isn't. This is what the emoluments clause was meant to stop. And will, eventually.
but republicans aren't really constitution type people - they are 'own the libs' kind of people.
DiscoGary wrote:
L L wrote:
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far.
it's true that republicans don't think people should pay taxes. gary says here that tax evasion is not 'wrong doing.'
this is why they elected a guy who has been caught cheating on taxes multiple times and refuses to show his returns.
republicans: "crime is fine if you are in the party"
no wrong doing. just republicans republicanning.
agip wrote:
raw bribery
which republicans are totally fine with.
but the constitution isn't. This is what the emoluments clause was meant to stop. And will, eventually.
but republicans aren't really constitution type people - they are 'own the libs' kind of people.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-president-trumps-hotel-in-new-york-revenue-went-up-this-spring--thanks-to-a-visit-from-big-spending-saudis/2018/08/03/58755392-9112-11e8-bcd5-9d911c784c38_story.html?utm_term=.14d733e12da3
Now the Trumplings love Muslims. How cute! Daddy is making them so open minded.
hmm....Gary sees nothing wrong with Manafort cheating on his taxes. So....maybe...maybe....since gary is a corrupted soul with no judgment who sees nothing wrong with crime...we shouldn't listen to him anymore. Maybe when he says Trump did nothing wrong...he's just applying his criminal mindset to our president. Maybe Trump is equally guilty as Manafort but Gary just doesn't see anything wrong with it.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/03/politics/paul-manafort-trial-day-four/index.html
agip wrote:
raw bribery
which republicans are totally fine with.
but the constitution isn't. This is what the emoluments clause was meant to stop. And will, eventually.
but republicans aren't really constitution type people - they are 'own the libs' kind of people.
You can be certain that Trump's "people" have a money deal with Manfort to not provide the goods on Trump. A deal similar to the $1.6 million payoff to get a woman to have an abortion of a Trump baby. The RNC paid that one for Trump.
agip wrote:
hmm....Gary sees nothing wrong with Manafort cheating on his taxes. So....maybe...maybe....since gary is a corrupted soul with no judgment who sees nothing wrong with crime...we shouldn't listen to him anymore. Maybe when he says Trump did nothing wrong...he's just applying his criminal mindset to our president. Maybe Trump is equally guilty as Manafort but Gary just doesn't see anything wrong with it.
Gary must accept that their is nothing wrong with cheating on taxes ... because Trump is absolutely guilty of that, many times over any cheating Manafort has done.
DiscoGary wrote:
L L wrote:
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far.
This is why you can’t possibly expect people to take you seriously. If you have been following, you’d know that so far his accountant and tax preparer both took the stand and neither said they were made aware or given information that would have led them to know about his foreign bank accounts, companies and other financial activities. They have produced documentary evidence of those accounts to the court. That means Paul knowingly left out those accounts and activities out of his tax returns and other required filings, which means big fvcking fraud my friend. This is classic tax and bank fraud.
How can you even entertain the idea that no evidence of wrong doing was provided yet? We have documentary evidence and testimony, That is proof. Do try to keep up for once instead of raising unbased suspicions. I know that’s how you trumpers roll but courts don’t care about conspiracy theories and gossip.
Trollminator wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any UNOBTAINIUM of wrong doing so far.
This is why you can’t possibly expect people to take you seriously.
^ Gary's post CLARIFIED
Gary post fixer wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
This is why you can’t possibly expect people to take you seriously.
^ Gary's post CLARIFIED
Thank you for clarifying. Does the deep state control all the unobtainium?
Trollminator wrote:
Gary post fixer wrote:
^ Gary's post CLARIFIED
Thank you for clarifying. Does the deep state control all the unobtainium?
no, Q controls it. The election and investigation are false flag operations to corner the unobtanium market, which will be used to run pedo camps in former sanctuary cities.
Trollminator wrote:
Gary post fixer wrote:
^ Gary's post CLARIFIED
Thank you for clarifying. Does the deep state control all the unobtainium?
Trump, Fox News and Brietbart control all the UNOBTAINIUM® . It is something that if obtained cannot be real.
agip wrote:
hmm....Gary sees nothing wrong with Manafort cheating on his taxes. So....maybe...maybe....since gary is a corrupted soul with no judgment who sees nothing wrong with crime...we shouldn't listen to him anymore. Maybe when he says Trump did nothing wrong...he's just applying his criminal mindset to our president. Maybe Trump is equally guilty as Manafort but Gary just doesn't see anything wrong with it.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/03/politics/paul-manafort-trial-day-four/index.html
Of course I've never said anything like that. You are a deranged lunatic.