Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

DiscoGary wrote:

While we're all colluding with Putin right now, maybe we should look into one of the issues he brought up. He accused our intelligence agencies of funneling $400 million into Hillary's campaign via Bill Browder. What the hell is that about? I haven't heard that name before. I think we need an independent council immediately, some FISA surveillance warrants based on manufactured evidence, with some spies planted in our intelligence community, and a sprinkling of office raids on lawyers. That's how we do things in the US when someone makes wild unfounded accusations.

1) Rated as "pants on fire" lie. Deflection anyway. Even if it were true, that doesn't absolve Trump of his crimes or your of your foolishness for continuing to support him.

2) Your continued use of a bold "council" doesn't absolve you of not knowing what the right word was initially when you were corrected on it.

3) No accusation about Trump and his staff has been wild and unfounded. He's a criminal who will get his comeuppance.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

So I give a list of policies and how it lead to growth and your response is that those policies did not lead to growth.

You cannot argue that Obama did not implement polices designed to help the economy recover.

And you certainly cannot argue that the economy did in fact recover and grow.

Look at job growth and unemployment numbers after the middle of 2010.

Look at GDP growth.

Look at market growth.

Those are facts.

Obama policies led to historically low growth rates during his term. As pointed out by Guess' mean right hook, Obama predicted that high growth rates were basically not possible anymore, only to be proved wrong in record time by Trump's reforms ... and Obama CAN'T take credit for it because he said it couldn't happen. Once again Liberals got it wrong.

Just a reminder to the unhinged left, Trump is rolling out a second tage of tax cuts in aimed specifically for the middle class. This is right before the midterms, so Democrats are going to have a choice to make, will they vote for middle-class tax cuts, or refuse to help the middle class, just before election?

No Blue Wave. Trump wins, America wins.

M-A-G-A!!!

DieHio wrote:

Ohio is Trump Country wrote:

Ohio is still Trump country!!!!!

Suck on that, you hillary loving, Christian hating pieces of trash.

Ohio's electoral vote total has been declining for decades. For the 2012 election it had 18 electoral votes, down from 21 in 2000 and down from a peak of 26 in 1968.

Yep. Two of Ohio's biggest cities, Cleveland and Cincinnati, have natural borders that stifle their growth. As the population of the country grows, there are obvious better places to inhabit. Ohio is a good place to raise a family, but with cold winters AND often hot humid summers, it isn't the best place to live, especially in retirement. That is another reason...older people leave Ohio to retire elsewhere, and I will do that too.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Doesn't absolve Trump of a poor response to all those American citizens in Puerto Rico.

FEMA was lauded and so was Trump by Puerto Rican officials. You relied solely on Trump bashing media outlets such as NYT, WaPo, CNN & PMSNBC.

Puerto Rican officials lauded Trump?

Maybe it was the President of Puerto Rico that Trump met that day. Ha!

+1

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

FEMA was lauded and so was Trump by Puerto Rican officials. You relied solely on Trump bashing media outlets such as NYT, WaPo, CNN & PMSNBC.

Puerto Rican officials lauded Trump?

https://www.newsweek.com/53-million-puerto-ricans-will-take-revenge-trump-governor-says-754711

Maybe it was the President of Puerto Rico that Trump met that day. Ha!

Like I said before, you rely heavily from Trump hating media sources and take it as gospel truth. News"weak" is in the same category as the others I listed.

Fat hurts wrote:

If in-person voter fraud was a problem then I might indeed be on board.

But it's not a problem. Almost nobody is stupid enough to risk a felony conviction just to cast one extra vote.

Foreign countries don't affect elections using in-person voter fraud.

The loophole here is this:

- Get Facebook data about millions of people and the preferences

- Target likely voters who seem the most pro-Trump

- Find ways to get those voters to the polls to ensure they vote

I can say the above is true based on what acquaintances of ours in New Jersey did. They were pro-Trump. They were contacted to find out how much they were willing to help. They said they were definitely voting, and would help in other ways. They were asked if they would be willing to drive a van to pickup voters and take them to the polls. They said yes. They were instructed to join a large group of van poolers to drive to Pennsylvania to pick up certain Amish voters and certain older voters and take them to vote. They were to provide food and drink as part of their service. Our acquaintances gladly did this.

Per se, there is nothing wrong with driving voters to polls. What is wrong is the level of targeting that was done using illegally obtained private information. And also wrong is driving out of state to help manipulate the vote in an area where you are not a voter.

Tommy Jefferson wrote:

yesIguess wrote:

Yeah, he was a democratic-republican. It was a party that believed in a limited government and individual liberty. They were directly opposed to the federalist party, which advocated for a strong central government. And yes, Lincoln was a republican.

What's your point? Or were you just asking if I knew haha?

Idiot. The term democratic-republican is used to distinguish what WAS originally called the Republican/Democrat party is in NO WAY related to today's Republican party. Of course you are too ignorant to understand that.

You're a complete moron dude. If Jefferson was around today he would be very right wing. You're out of your element kiddo.

Correct.

yesIguess wrote:

Tommy Jefferson wrote:

Idiot. The term democratic-republican is used to distinguish what WAS originally called the Republican/Democrat party is in NO WAY related to today's Republican party. Of course you are too ignorant to understand that.

You're a complete moron dude. If Jefferson was around today he would be very right wing. You're out of your element kiddo.

"Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party, which was developed by Anti-Federalists in 1792. The Democratic Republicans were in support of state rights and a strict interpretation of the US Constitution. The party was prominent in the early 1800s. However, in the 1820s and 1830s the party split into the Whigs and the Democrats."

You stupid, f****** moron. Jesus

yesIguess wrote:

"Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party

Moron. To distinguish it from the modern Republican Party (founded in 1854), political scientists, and pundits often refer to this party as the Democratic-Republican Party; historians often say Jeffersonian Republicans.

In other words, moron, Jefferson WAS NOT A REPUBLICAN. Modern Republican Party to get that through your dense skull.

Tommy Jefferson wrote:

yesIguess wrote:

"Thomas Jefferson belonged to the Democratic-Republican Party

Moron. To distinguish it from the modern Republican Party (founded in 1854), political scientists, and pundits often refer to this party as the Democratic-Republican Party; historians often say Jeffersonian Republicans.

In other words, moron, Jefferson WAS NOT A REPUBLICAN. Modern Republican Party to get that through your dense skull.

The modern republican party is, in principle, strong on state's rights and individual liberties, with a limited government. Which is nearly identical to Jefferson's political philosophy. If the party called Republican existed in the late 1700's, Jefferson would have identified as one.

My original point was that it is ironic that a liberal, who supports the government having a massive role in our lives, would be quoting Thomas Jefferson, a man opposed to a strong central government.

This is not complicated. Thanks for coming out, enjoy your day. Yeeesh.

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Because our FBI and DOJ are corrupt. They covered for Hillary and tried to take out Trump. We know this now. There will be no justice because the institutions that would deliver that justice refuse to do it. We are living in a banana republic.

I admit I asked the question just to laugh at your response. I cannot get enough of the Deep State lecture. Mind telling us when you expect Trump to finally hold the keys to the Deep State. Seems a little odd and unfair that people who are no longer around still control the whole system. When will it ever be the victim Trump’s turn?

Exactly. Republicans control both the FBI and DOJ. If there is a problem, fix it instead of whining about it.

hey m@gas - the generic ballot has blammed out to 9.4%.

might want to get a wetsuit ready - the blue tsunami is heading right at you.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-generic-ballot-polls/

yesIguess wrote:

Tommy Jefferson wrote:

Moron. To distinguish it from the modern Republican Party (founded in 1854), political scientists, and pundits often refer to this party as the Democratic-Republican Party; historians often say Jeffersonian Republicans.

In other words, moron, Jefferson WAS NOT A REPUBLICAN. Modern Republican Party to get that through your dense skull.

The modern republican party is, in principle, strong on state's rights and individual liberties, with a limited government. Which is nearly identical to Jefferson's political philosophy. If the party called Republican existed in the late 1700's, Jefferson would have identified as one.

My original point was that it is ironic that a liberal, who supports the government having a massive role in our lives, would be quoting Thomas Jefferson, a man opposed to a strong central government.

This is not complicated. Thanks for coming out, enjoy your day. Yeeesh.

stop with the lame 'liberals are socialists' argument.

modern Democrats are not for 'massive' government roles in our lives

agip wrote:

hey m@gas - the generic ballot has blammed out to 9.4%.

might want to get a wetsuit ready - the blue tsunami is heading right at you.

Trump's approval rating in Texas is now below 40%.

agip wrote:

yesIguess wrote:

The modern republican party is, in principle, strong on state's rights and individual liberties, with a limited government. Which is nearly identical to Jefferson's political philosophy. If the party called Republican existed in the late 1700's, Jefferson would have identified as one.

My original point was that it is ironic that a liberal, who supports the government having a massive role in our lives, would be quoting Thomas Jefferson, a man opposed to a strong central government.

This is not complicated. Thanks for coming out, enjoy your day. Yeeesh.

stop with the lame 'liberals are socialists' argument.

modern Democrats are not for 'massive' government roles in our lives

Convince your peers of that. I wish I could believe that. I have no issue with the Bill Clinton democrat. But unfortunately, the Alexandria Cortes types are surging. Bernie Sanders did way to darn well for it not to scare me. Honestly, maybe I'm wrong? Honest question with no sarcasm, do you feel that center left democrats are more prevalent than democratic-socialists?

yesIguess wrote:

agip wrote:

stop with the lame 'liberals are socialists' argument.

modern Democrats are not for 'massive' government roles in our lives

Convince your peers of that. I wish I could believe that. I have no issue with the Bill Clinton democrat. But unfortunately, the Alexandria Cortes types are surging. Bernie Sanders did way to darn well for it not to scare me. Honestly, maybe I'm wrong? Honest question with no sarcasm, do you feel that center left democrats are more prevalent than democratic-socialists?

absolutely - but they are older and quieter, so they dont' get the press.

cortes got 10,000 votes. HRC got 60+ million and won the popular vote.

Obama was a centrist and won two terms

Bill Clinton was a centrist and was elected twice.

Bernie is just another example of too-lefty Dem candidates who lose. They never have won nationally.

Easy to get whipped into hysteria by the media telling you to panic...the voting results show the Dems have moved a bit to the left but are still a centrist party.

your daily reminder that our president is a moran of the extreme degree.

this is today.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-returns-to-touting-his-summit-with-putin-a-day-after-doing-damage-control/2018/07/18/ff794dea-8a70-11e8-8aea-86e88ae760d8_story.html?utm_term=.6dd76f36e0f0