Translation: ADoltInTheRoom is the f*cking idiot he claims he isn't and is now throwing a tantrum like a two year old hopped up on sugar.
Rather than baselessly attacking the results of a survey from a reputable organization just because you don't like the results, maybe you could provide some evidence that the survey is wrong? I know that actually providing evidence to support your arguments will be uncharted territory for you, but you should really give it a try.
Human psychology and common sense say the survey is wrong which is why I provided the wife beating example.
What part of the survey do you think was wrong? You think more than 11.5% of Jewish Americans “somewhat agree” or “strongly agree” with the statement that “Hamas was justified in attacking Israel as part of their struggle for a Palestinian state”?
57.5% agreed that Hamas was justified in gangraping women to death while their babies screamed as they burned alive in the oven.
It's baffling that you two think this is a good argument for you.
When you have to appeal to exaggeration, rather than simply sticking to the facts - which were quoted and sourced above - it’s a sure sign that you’re losing the argument. It’s baffling that you think you’re making any sense at all.
Bibi giving up on the hostages - claims there will be no ceasefire until they get the hostages back. I suspect some have already died from the IDF's bombings. The families are mounting the pressure on him. The only reason Hamas has hostages is to exchange them for prisoners. And no ceasefire only benefits Hamas... so clearly Bibi doesn't know what he's doing. Or he does but doesn't give a damn.
Meanwhile, Blinken claims people have forgotten Hamas' attack so quickly. He's wrong - we have an elephant in the room with Israel's vastly disproportionate response, a massive humanitarian disaster worsening by the hour.. no wonder people aren't talking about Israeli victims. Here we have the IDF continuing to push the launch button and countless civilians are dying. People are going to pay attention to this.
Ok so we've got one here that fully supports the total genocide of Palestinians. No better than a brainwashed arab fundamentalist. Any others?
He was being facetious...
I don’t really know what to believe on this very complicated and heated issue, but I would like to work for David Polk someday so I’m practicing having the right opinion
Actually, 0 American Muslims this week answered yes to a poll asking if they approved of the October 7th massacre.
57.5% of Muslim Americans said they "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" that "Hamas was justified in attacking Israel as part of their struggle for a Palestinian State".
Thanks for clearing that up. Agreeing that Hamas was justified in attacking Israel on October 7th is very different to approving of Hamas attacking Israel on October 7th. Glad we've got that sorted.
57.5% agreed that Hamas was justified in gangraping women to death while their babies screamed as they burned alive in the oven.
It's baffling that you two think this is a good argument for you.
When you have to appeal to exaggeration, rather than simply sticking to the facts - which were quoted and sourced above - it’s a sure sign that you’re losing the argument. It’s baffling that you think you’re making any sense at all.
What exaggeration?
Hamas literally did this. There were no military targets on 10/7. The whole point of the operation was to find Israeli civilians and kill as many as possible.
Bibi giving up on the hostages - claims there will be no ceasefire until they get the hostages back. I suspect some have already died from the IDF's bombings. The families are mounting the pressure on him. The only reason Hamas has hostages is to exchange them for prisoners. And no ceasefire only benefits Hamas... so clearly Bibi doesn't know what he's doing. Or he does but doesn't give a damn.
Meanwhile, Blinken claims people have forgotten Hamas' attack so quickly. He's wrong - we have an elephant in the room with Israel's vastly disproportionate response, a massive humanitarian disaster worsening by the hour.. no wonder people aren't talking about Israeli victims. Here we have the IDF continuing to push the launch button and countless civilians are dying. People are going to pay attention to this.
Hamas doesn't give a damn about the prisoners.
Hamas took hostages in the hope that Israel wouldn't attack them for fear of hurting them.
Arab man asks why Hamas has built hundreds of kilometers of Hamas tunnels under Gaza but not a single air raid shelter for civilians. pic.twitter.com/luiscP96Rx
This guy gets it. Though in fairness if Hamas did use any of the billions in aid money theyve stolen to build air raid shelters they would refuse the palestinians access to them because they value dead palestinians for PR more than live palestinians.
This post was edited 14 minutes after it was posted.
Hezbollah has been saying all week, A Huge announcement would be made, They announced, basically threatening escalation just like every other day, so no beg deal
When you have to appeal to exaggeration, rather than simply sticking to the facts - which were quoted and sourced above - it’s a sure sign that you’re losing the argument. It’s baffling that you think you’re making any sense at all.
What exaggeration?
Hamas literally did this. There were no military targets on 10/7. The whole point of the operation was to find Israeli civilians and kill as many as possible.
This is common knowledge.
You think that more than 10% of Jewish Americans (some 500,000 individuals) believe that Hamas was justified in gangraping women to death while their babies screamed as they burned alive in the oven?
Because either Jewish Americans are a bigger problem than anybody realized or you don’t know how to interpret a survey. I’m guessing it’s the later.
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
Hamas literally did this. There were no military targets on 10/7. The whole point of the operation was to find Israeli civilians and kill as many as possible.
This is common knowledge.
You think that more than 10% of Jewish Americans (some 500,000 individuals) believe that Hamas was justified in gangraping women to death while their babies screamed as they burned alive in the oven?
Because either Jewish Americans are a bigger problem than anybody realized or you don’t know how to interpret a survey. I’m guessing it’s the later.
Secular Jews that buy into the woke nonsense that the powerful are always evil and the weak are always righteous would absolutely believe that.
"The ends justify the means" is 100% a belief of the left.
A minimum of 10% of the left will believe the most disgusting things imaginable.
This post was edited 14 minutes after it was posted.
Human psychology and common sense say the survey is wrong which is why I provided the wife beating example.
What part of the survey do you think was wrong? You think more than 11.5% of Jewish Americans “somewhat agree” or “strongly agree” with the statement that “Hamas was justified in attacking Israel as part of their struggle for a Palestinian state”?
Why do you think you need to keep combining the two categories rather than saying that 3.9% strongly agree?
Can you tell us how they verified that the people who self identified as Jewish for the poll (out of the 2,020 people polled) are actually Jewish?
Why don't you compare the number of people who "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" to "Hamas being justified" with the numbers who were "somewhat aware" or "not aware" of the facts? Given that in every case there were more Jewish people who were "not aware" of the facts (and even more only "somewhat aware") is that not problematic for you for if those who were "not aware" of the facts may be the same who strongly agree that Hamas was justified? Do they know what they are agreeing with?
How many people polled identified as Jewish? How did they pick these people?
What part of the survey do you think was wrong? You think more than 11.5% of Jewish Americans “somewhat agree” or “strongly agree” with the statement that “Hamas was justified in attacking Israel as part of their struggle for a Palestinian state”?
Why do you think you need to keep combining the two categories rather than saying that 3.9% strongly agree?
Can you tell us how they verified that the people who self identified as Jewish for the poll (out of the 2,020 people polled) are actually Jewish?
Why don't you compare the number of people who "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" to "Hamas being justified" with the numbers who were "somewhat aware" or "not aware" of the facts? Given that in every case there were more Jewish people who were "not aware" of the facts (and even more only "somewhat aware") is that not problematic for you for if those who were "not aware" of the facts may be the same who strongly agree that Hamas was justified? Do they know what they are agreeing with?
How many people polled identified as Jewish? How did they pick these people?
Sorry - 3.6% strongly agree. How many people polled was that exactly? Tell us that number, since you are the one relying on this poll, surely you can do that.
8.8% of those who self identified as Jewish Identity for the poll were "other" - what does that mean?
Why do you think you need to keep combining the two categories rather than saying that 3.9% strongly agree?
Can you tell us how they verified that the people who self identified as Jewish for the poll (out of the 2,020 people polled) are actually Jewish?
Why don't you compare the number of people who "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" to "Hamas being justified" with the numbers who were "somewhat aware" or "not aware" of the facts? Given that in every case there were more Jewish people who were "not aware" of the facts (and even more only "somewhat aware") is that not problematic for you for if those who were "not aware" of the facts may be the same who strongly agree that Hamas was justified? Do they know what they are agreeing with?
How many people polled identified as Jewish? How did they pick these people?
Sorry - 3.6% strongly agree. How many people polled was that exactly? Tell us that number, since you are the one relying on this poll, surely you can do that.
8.8% of those who self identified as Jewish Identity for the poll were "other" - what does that mean?
I don't give a sh*t about the poll. I'm just pointing out that Coevett's and ADolt's characterization of the poll is false.
Coevett was the one that (mis)quoted the statistic that combined "somewhat agree" and "strongly agree".
Sorry - 3.6% strongly agree. How many people polled was that exactly? Tell us that number, since you are the one relying on this poll, surely you can do that.
8.8% of those who self identified as Jewish Identity for the poll were "other" - what does that mean?
I don't give a sh*t about the poll. I'm just pointing out that Coevett's and ADolt's characterization of the poll is false.
Coevett was the one that (mis)quoted the statistic that combined "somewhat agree" and "strongly agree".
Do the math and figure out the numbers yourself.
Do you somewhat agree that gang rape and infantide are legitimate forms of political speech or military conduct?
There has been enormous press coverage of posters about Israeli hostages being torn down on college campuses. We need to alert people to the fact that Israel partisans have been tearing down posters about Palestine for many years! Please let us know if that happened to you! Reply to this email and tell us the campus, the year, and if possible, what the poster was about. We will then post a report on this.
There has been enormous press coverage of posters about Israeli hostages being torn down on college campuses. We need to alert people to the fact that Israel partisans have been tearing down posters about Palestine for many years! Please let us know if that happened to you! Reply to this email and tell us the campus, the year, and if possible, what the poster was about. We will then post a report on this.
Hamas bless tireless work from USA Democrat fellow jew hater. Continue please....much love great ally!!!!!
I don't give a sh*t about the poll. I'm just pointing out that Coevett's and ADolt's characterization of the poll is false.
Coevett was the one that (mis)quoted the statistic that combined "somewhat agree" and "strongly agree".
Do the math and figure out the numbers yourself.
Do you somewhat agree that gang rape and infantide are legitimate forms of political speech or military conduct?
Obviously your answer is yes...
No. But I strongly agree that you can’t make a single post without completely mischaracterizing my position. It’s a sign that your “argument” is weak or nonsensical that you have to resort to such antics.
Do you somewhat agree that gang rape and infantide are legitimate forms of political speech or military conduct?
Obviously your answer is yes...
No. But I strongly agree that you can’t make a single post without completely mischaracterizing my position. It’s a sign that your “argument” is weak or nonsensical that you have to resort to such antics.
Perhaps the issue is your complete inability to articulate your position.
You declare the world would be better off without Israel parroting Hamas talking points.
Why wouldn't a reasonable person think you support their position?
You can't provide a single viable alternative to what Israel is doing despite being asked to do so multiple times. As far as I can tell your only position is "I hate Israel".
Become a Premium Member: https://www.jimmydore.com/premium-membershipGo to a Live Show: https://www.jimmydore.com/tour Subscribe to Our Newsletter: https://m...
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.