sigh. . . wrote:
Cavorty wrote:
If it's any consolation I was out to 8:30 pace today....
It has taken quite a bit of work to get into that shape though. Probably helps that I've never really had more than a few weeks off since I was a kid.
Now you're just humblebragging. That really doesn't help.
When I was around 40 I ran a 1:15 half and 55 10-mile (in other words, decently fast), but 8:30 would be a respectable jogging pace for me now, one I probably rarely hit.
My lesson from observing running is that nothing is "fair" or "typical." Everyone has different life, running, and physical issues, and the combination of those results in a huge variation in runners' decline, stasis, or, even, improvement in time.
Enjoy those runs! You are one of the lucky!
Actually, it was just tongue in cheek, and I thought in line with the "I want to kill you" joke(?).
In all seriousness, until the COVID cancelled everything, I had raced every year since I was 14, so going on 50 straight years.
I did x-county, road and track league in England until my late 30s (800m, 1500m, 3000m s/c mostly). Moved to the US and mostly competed in road 5ks, although I placed in the USATF Masters in the 3000m s/c, 5000m and 3000m indoors on some rare track excursions.
I had 12 weeks off this fall - mostly work related, it was too tempting to use the extra time for work with nothing to aim for - and started again the last week of December. I ran 2 miles at 8:00, the first day back and could hardly walk the next day.
It's taken a ton of hard work to get back and the 8.3 miles in 7:05 is my best longer run since. The next day 8:27 was all I could muster for 3.14 miles (although I did 5 at 7:31 today).
I guess I've got two points 1) "sigh...wrote" - "I want to kill you" presumably because he thought the 8.3 miles was quite quick (although I'm well aware that it's pretty tepid relative to the better 60-64) and I was remarking that he'd probably hate me a lot less when he realized that all I was able to day the next day was jog 3 miles.
My broader point 2) was that there seem to be two schools of thought here. One is that you should give up serious racing and training at 50 (or whatever arbitrary age you pick). I'm from the opposite school that believes that with sufficient intensity you can still keep running at reasonable pace at a fairly advanced age, and that I'm personally still going at least respectably, even after a lifetime of training and racing. Personally, without competition, I'd find it hard to have the motivation do anything much exercise-wise.