Just because you're too stupid to know what circumstantial evidence is, that's not exactly our problem to solve.
Karen Rodgers - quit with the insults and name-calling. It makes you look like you are about 7 years old. And Karen, you keep referring to evidence and police reports, etc. yet you have not once cited a single one. Again, only accusations against the guy.
Not one person in this thread has presented one shred of incriminating evidence against Masterson outside of women accusing him 20 years after the claim. Just laughable.
Karen Rodgers - quit with the insults and name-calling. It makes you look like you are about 7 years old. And Karen, you keep referring to evidence and police reports, etc. yet you have not once cited a single one. Again, only accusations against the guy.
Not one person in this thread has presented one shred of incriminating evidence against Masterson outside of women accusing him 20 years after the claim. Just laughable.
Multiple women and their peers to who they reported the rapes when they happened is actually very real evidence.
Enough to convince 12 random jurors… and to enough that Mastersons defense team couldn’t poke holes in their testimony.
Not one person in this thread has presented one shred of incriminating evidence against Masterson outside of women accusing him 20 years after the claim. Just laughable.
Multiple women and their peers to who they reported the rapes when they happened is actually very real evidence.
Enough to convince 12 random jurors… and to enough that Mastersons defense team couldn’t poke holes in their testimony.
This is the first I have heard that they reported the rapes to their peers at the time. That is actual evidence if true.
The proof against Danny Masterson included testimony from three women who said he sexually assaulted them at his Hollywood home between 2001 and 2003. The women said he gave them drugs before the assaults. They also said he gave them drinks in 2003, and they became woozy or passed out before he raped them. The allegations against Masterson first surfaced in March 2017. In November 2017, Out team reported that a fourth woman had accused Masterson of raping her in the early 2000s.Masterson starred on That ’70s Show, which was airing at the time of his crimes. The jury found Masterson guilty of two of the three charges. He was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison.
There is nothing about the alleged victims talking to their peers at the time.
Also,
Despite the recurring theme of drugging in the victims’ testimonies, there was a noticeable absence of toxicology evidence to support this claim. Consequently, Masterson wasn’t charged based on the drugging allegations.
Again, it seems he was solely convicted on accusations that women never made until 15 years after the fact. Matlock would have torn these accusers to shreds.
You must have a terrible, terrible lot in life to say that to an anonymous poster here. Do no men want to date you? Were you dumped by your ex-Bf. I can't imagine having the anger to say that to someone you don't even know. I pity you, Karen.
The proof against Danny Masterson included testimony from three women who said he sexually assaulted them at his Hollywood home between 2001 and 2003. The women said he gave them drugs before the assaults. They also said he gave them drinks in 2003, and they became woozy or passed out before he raped them. The allegations against Masterson first surfaced in March 2017. In November 2017, Out team reported that a fourth woman had accused Masterson of raping her in the early 2000s.Masterson starred on That ’70s Show, which was airing at the time of his crimes. The jury found Masterson guilty of two of the three charges. He was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison.
There is nothing about the alleged victims talking to their peers at the time.
Also,
Despite the recurring theme of drugging in the victims’ testimonies, there was a noticeable absence of toxicology evidence to support this claim. Consequently, Masterson wasn’t charged based on the drugging allegations.
Again, it seems he was solely convicted on accusations that women never made until 15 years after the fact. Matlock would have torn these accusers to shreds.
Scores of people testified. That’s evidence. Get over it. A rapist is behind bars. That’s a good thing for you “law and order” types.
The proof against Danny Masterson included testimony from three women who said he sexually assaulted them at his Hollywood home between 2001 and 2003. The women said he gave them drugs before the assaults. They also said he gave them drinks in 2003, and they became woozy or passed out before he raped them. The allegations against Masterson first surfaced in March 2017. In November 2017, Out team reported that a fourth woman had accused Masterson of raping her in the early 2000s.Masterson starred on That ’70s Show, which was airing at the time of his crimes. The jury found Masterson guilty of two of the three charges. He was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison.
There is nothing about the alleged victims talking to their peers at the time.
Also,
Despite the recurring theme of drugging in the victims’ testimonies, there was a noticeable absence of toxicology evidence to support this claim. Consequently, Masterson wasn’t charged based on the drugging allegations.
Again, it seems he was solely convicted on accusations that women never made until 15 years after the fact. Matlock would have torn these accusers to shreds.
Scores of people testified. That’s evidence. Get over it. A rapist is behind bars. That’s a good thing for you “law and order” types.
If he is a rapist I am delighted he is behind bars for life. All of this evidence you guys keep talking about, I have not seen. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE???
Scores of people testified. That’s evidence. Get over it. A rapist is behind bars. That’s a good thing for you “law and order” types.
If he is a rapist I am delighted he is behind bars for life. All of this evidence you guys keep talking about, I have not seen. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE???
The thing is physical evidence is not necessary to convict someone of a sex crime. Multiple accusers with similar accountants is what did him in. It happened 20 years ago so the physical evidence is long gone.
This is a great thing for women’s safety. Only in recent years have women been given a platform to speak out against these abuses. Scumbags like this need to know there’s heavy consequences to pay. Trumps next…
If he is a rapist I am delighted he is behind bars for life. All of this evidence you guys keep talking about, I have not seen. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE???
The thing is physical evidence is not necessary to convict someone of a sex crime. Multiple accusers with similar accountants is what did him in. It happened 20 years ago so the physical evidence is long gone.
This is a great thing for women’s safety. Only in recent years have women been given a platform to speak out against these abuses. Scumbags like this need to know there’s heavy consequences to pay. Trumps next…
Do you even realize what you just said? You are talking about heavy consequences to pay and "Trumps (sic) next." Where is the Due process for Trump? Do you just want to take him out to the nearest tree and hang him? You guys have become pretty nuts.
If he is a rapist I am delighted he is behind bars for life. All of this evidence you guys keep talking about, I have not seen. WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE???
The thing is physical evidence is not necessary to convict someone of a sex crime. Multiple accusers with similar accountants is what did him in. It happened 20 years ago so the physical evidence is long gone.
This is a great thing for women’s safety. Only in recent years have women been given a platform to speak out against these abuses. Scumbags like this need to know there’s heavy consequences to pay. Trumps next…
3 women who might have been wronged decide to all claim that Masterson raped them? No DNA, no corroborating statements, no reports from the police. EVERYTHING is the accusations from women 20 years after the effing fact.
Why didn't Danny's lawyers do that, if that evidence was so flimsy?
Why didn't Danny testify for himself, if he really didn't do it?
Why did he pay the first accuser $400,000, if again, he really didn't do it?
Just because you don't think there was evidence, that doesn't mean that the judge thought so, or the jury thought so, or that even Danny's lawyers thought so. In the exact same way that it was the prosecution's job to present the case in a manner in which the duly appointed jury of peers could make a decision, it is not my or anyone here's duty to inform YOU of the evidence; you are asking for a counterfactual to something that has already happened in a straight-forward manner, therefore it is on YOU and not me to seek it out the information to support your counterfactual. In the absence of proving that there wasn't any presented and given that the only conclusive thing that we have is that a jury found a rapist guilty of rape, all of your blathering amounts to some stupid person's stubborn, ill-formed opinion.
For someone who probably gets steamed up about law and order, you seem to have a real issue with the legal system working exactly how it's intended. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Actually, it's worse than pathetic -- I want you to know, personally, you and Newname and whoever else, that I think that you're incredibly stupid and that no one here is dumb enough to fall for what you're trying to do. Personally I'm waiting on idiotboy Rojo to chime in about how he got some girl blackout drunk back in the day and that it was her fault for wearing what she was wearing.
This post was edited 9 minutes after it was posted.
From the judges sentencing statement - time for you to move the goalposts again …
You were convicted because each of the victims reported the rapes to someone shortly after the rapes occurred, also back in 2001 and 2003. Jane Doe 2 told her mother and friends; thus reporting the rape. Jane Doe 1 reported the rape to Scientology officials and also wrote letters to Scientology’s International Justice Chief reporting the rape. They also reported the rape to Los Angeles Police Department almost, approximately a year later. And Jane Doe 3 reported the rape to Scientology ethics officers and higher officials within the Scientology organization shortly after the rape. In addition, shortly after the rape, you paid Jane Doe 1 approximately $400,000 to keep quiet about the charged sexual incident. And while some may argue that whether you believed her story was true or not, you just didn’t want the bad publicity, she was seeking money from you, close to half a million dollars is an awful lot to pay for the silence about an incident that you claimed never happened. The events as relayed by the victims were similar to each other. And during the time that victims told other people about the rapes shortly after the rapes had occurred, the victims were still Scientologists. They had not left the organization yet.
3 women who might have been wronged decide to all claim that Masterson raped them? No DNA, no corroborating statements, no reports from the police. EVERYTHING is the accusations from women 20 years after the effing fact.
This is what people don't understand. Three individuals, somehow at the same time, decided to come and accuse him, or separate incidents. None of them told anyone at the time, none of them reported it at the time. It's a joke. It's not just justice. Danny Masterson is probably guilty, but there is no proof that anything actually happened. No pictures, bruise marks, witnesses. No admission of guilt by the accused. This is not how justice systems are supposed to work.
All the idiots here have no problem with Danny being found guilty, until they are the ones being wrongfully accused (for the record, I think he's guilty).
3 women who might have been wronged decide to all claim that Masterson raped them? No DNA, no corroborating statements, no reports from the police. EVERYTHING is the accusations from women 20 years after the effing fact.
None of them told anyone at the time, none of them reported it at the time. It's a joke.
"..each of the victims reported the rapes to someone shortly after the rapes occurred, also back in 2001 and 2003. Jane Doe 2 told her mother and friends; thus reporting the rape. Jane Doe 1 reported the rape to Scientology officials and also wrote letters to Scientology’s International Justice Chief reporting the rape. They also reported the rape to Los Angeles Police Department almost, approximately a year later. And Jane Doe 3 reported the rape to Scientology ethics officers and higher officials within the Scientology organization shortly after the rape."
Tell me, Einstein: what part of that is hard to understand?
Go ahead and move the goalposts. You're down to two options: move the goalposts, or admit that you can't read.
This post was edited 54 seconds after it was posted.
None of them told anyone at the time, none of them reported it at the time. It's a joke.
"..each of the victims reported the rapes to someone shortly after the rapes occurred, also back in 2001 and 2003. Jane Doe 2 told her mother and friends; thus reporting the rape. Jane Doe 1 reported the rape to Scientology officials and also wrote letters to Scientology’s International Justice Chief reporting the rape. They also reported the rape to Los Angeles Police Department almost, approximately a year later. And Jane Doe 3 reported the rape to Scientology ethics officers and higher officials within the Scientology organization shortly after the rape."
Tell me, Einstein: what part of that is hard to understand?
Go ahead and move the goalposts. You're down to two options: move the goalposts, or admit that you can't read.
Where is your anger coming from? You can not provide one piece of solid evidence so you resort to calling everyone who is demanding to see the actually evidence stupid. Karen, really?
"..each of the victims reported the rapes to someone shortly after the rapes occurred, also back in 2001 and 2003. Jane Doe 2 told her mother and friends; thus reporting the rape. Jane Doe 1 reported the rape to Scientology officials and also wrote letters to Scientology’s International Justice Chief reporting the rape. They also reported the rape to Los Angeles Police Department almost, approximately a year later. And Jane Doe 3 reported the rape to Scientology ethics officers and higher officials within the Scientology organization shortly after the rape."
Tell me, Einstein: what part of that is hard to understand?
Go ahead and move the goalposts. You're down to two options: move the goalposts, or admit that you can't read.
Where is your anger coming from? You can not provide one piece of solid evidence so you resort to calling everyone who is demanding to see the actually evidence stupid. Karen, really?
Karen - let look at the evidence piece by piece and please answer. Was there any DNA of Danny's found on the "victims?"
Where is your anger coming from? You can not provide one piece of solid evidence so you resort to calling everyone who is demanding to see the actually evidence stupid. Karen, really?
Karen - let look at the evidence piece by piece and please answer. Was there any DNA of Danny's found on the "victims?"
Where is your anger coming from? You can not provide one piece of solid evidence so you resort to calling everyone who is demanding to see the actually evidence stupid. Karen, really?
Karen - let look at the evidence piece by piece and please answer. Was there any DNA of Danny's found on the "victims?"
He claimed it was consensual, so DNA doesn’t matter. He admitted to having sex.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.