Trumper are in full meltdown mode. Their extreme desperation is self-evident. The only reason Kennedy is retiring now is that he know Trump will never be able to anoint another conservative SCOTUS member after the November elections. Trump are in PANIC mode.
Desperation Trumpers wrote:
Trumper are in full meltdown mode. Their extreme desperation is self-evident. The only reason Kennedy is retiring now is that he know Trump will never be able to anoint another conservative SCOTUS member after the November elections. Trump are in PANIC mode.
Clintonettes have been in full meltdown mode for over a year and a half. It's embarrassing how self-evident their deflection of issues are involving their lost lying leader, HRC. The Democrats are in full PANIC mode now, hoping for a viable candidate for 2020. The lying Obama following liberals lost it all and are really scattered and are praying for a miracle. Sad little liberal liars.
Clintonettes are NOT Americans!
The Trumper meltdown continues.
Trumpers melting wrote:
The Trumper meltdown continues.
The sore loser Clintoners continue to meltdown after the 11/8/16 beatdown:):):):):):):):):):):)
But you forgot Obama, he was almost as bad as both Clintons combined. Used his race to get away with everything. Shut out the Republicans constantly. Where were the true democrats then?
Trumpers melting wrote:
The Trumper meltdown continues.
I love this thread, I could be here all day!!!!!!! Those on the left don't know when to stop. I feel sad for them, not!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Meh. Rigged and Gary are the two biggest lack-of-knowledge posters on this thread. They spew uneducated right-wing propaganda, the bulk of which is based in lies or lack of evidence.
Mueller is coming, but so are other...Southern District of New York is coming. DNC is coming. Michael Avenatti is coming, and now TOM ARNOLD is coming. Would be hilarious if TOM ARNOLD is the one who brings down this president. Someone will, and the odds on favorite is still Bob Mueller.
The clown is done.
Pinning your hopes on Avenatti again? Bahahaha! What happened to Stormy?
Tom "cokehead" Arnold- really?
You can't possibly be serious.
Mueller? Never
You are living up to your nickname, Clownpole. Forever.
I don't have "hopes". I only state facts. Avenatti is coming. Tom Arnold is coming. Those are facts. Like I said, it would be hilarious if Tom Arnold is the one who brings him down. Note that I also said the favorite to bring Donald "Tallahassee Trail" Trump down is Mueller.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
The Trumper meltdown advances.
outsidetheboxthinker wrote:
Flagpole - Should the Dems argue that Trump is about to be impeached, so they shouldn't allow his nomination to proceed?
No. I was for Obama being able to nominate a justice, and I am for Trump being able to also.
I don't want any impeachment talk from Democrat brass until the Mueller report is out. Pelosi is right about that.
Avid Listener wrote:
Avid Listener wrote:
Disagree all you want. You’re still wrong.
Which J-school did you graduate from?
See, asked twice and didn’t get an answer. Do you think if I keep asking you that you will give me an accurate answer.
In the meantime, I did my research and found from two sources that you did not attend J-school. In addition, you worked for a short time as a sports reporter (not a journalist as you claimed) and then an even shorter time reporting on politics. Both got a very small outlet.
Not accurate.
I have a degree in journalism and English. I have worked for two big daily newspapers as a reporter and a few other weeklies too. I have covered sports, local government, politics. I have had a beat on the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry.
1101 wrote:
But you forgot Obama, he was almost as bad as both Clintons combined. Used his race to get away with everything. Shut out the Republicans constantly. Where were the true democrats then?
Gary you stick out like a sore thumb
Yup. The expected response to Trump's SCOTUS approved travel ban that includes a ban on North Koreans. Trump had to add NKers and Venezuelers to his Moolum ban so it would not look like a Mooslum ban. Oops . . . RIP Trump's Nobel Peace Prize.
foo wrote:
The winning continues...
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/27/politics/north-korea-infrastructure-improvements-nuclear-facility/index.html
Avid Listener wrote:
The last video is a hoot. What an outright liar Gibbs is, yet the left wingers on this thread rip Trump. Unbelievable how seemingly average to above average people can't see that. You were happy when Obama did it because it met your criteria and beliefs, regardless of the costs, yet when the other side comes in..."that's different". I love when you guys complain and whine as it shows your bitterness...so feel free to move. The Clintons pilfered the system and that was fine, but...
This post was not made by me. I do not believe those statements.
I will sum up the Justice Kennedy situation.
Mitch McConnell is a turd.
He violated the Constitution when he refused the "advised" portion where the senate must advise and consent a president's nomination for Supreme Court when he refused to have a confirmation hearing and vote on Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland when Scalia passed away in February 2016.
His reasoning was that he would not do that in an election year.
Well, we now are another election year where the Senate can possibly change leadership.
It is almost July (much closer to election day than February) and Justice Kennedy will be stepping down.
McConnell has promised a confirmation vote this fall, before the Senate could possibly change hands.
All that said, they do have the right to replace him this year. But precedent has been set where it can be pushed.
Justice Kennedy is aware of the politics. He chose to step down now. He chose to have this president and this senate pick his successor.
So we have to accept whoever gets confirmed.
But if the Democrats pick up two seats this fall in the Senate (a big if), they can use McConnell's Garland precedent to not confirm any Trump SC nominees in 2019 or 2020.
I think from now on, we will only get new SC Justices when the president and the Senate majority are of the same party.
L L wrote:
I will sum up the Justice Kennedy situation.
Mitch McConnell is a turd.
He violated the Constitution when he refused the "advised" portion where the senate must advise and consent a president's nomination for Supreme Court when he refused to have a confirmation hearing and vote on Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland when Scalia passed away in February 2016.
His reasoning was that he would not do that in an election year.
Well, we now are another election year where the Senate can possibly change leadership.
It is almost July (much closer to election day than February) and Justice Kennedy will be stepping down.
McConnell has promised a confirmation vote this fall, before the Senate could possibly change hands.
All that said, they do have the right to replace him this year. But precedent has been set where it can be pushed.
Justice Kennedy is aware of the politics. He chose to step down now. He chose to have this president and this senate pick his successor.
So we have to accept whoever gets confirmed.
But if the Democrats pick up two seats this fall in the Senate (a big if), they can use McConnell's Garland precedent to not confirm any Trump SC nominees in 2019 or 2020.
I think from now on, we will only get new SC Justices when the president and the Senate majority are of the same party.
It's kind of sad how political the supreme court has become. They're really just politicians in black robes at this point. See the 2000 election for exhibit A.
Racket wrote:
L L wrote:
I will sum up the Justice Kennedy situation.
Mitch McConnell is a turd.
He violated the Constitution when he refused the "advised" portion where the senate must advise and consent a president's nomination for Supreme Court when he refused to have a confirmation hearing and vote on Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland when Scalia passed away in February 2016.
His reasoning was that he would not do that in an election year.
Well, we now are another election year where the Senate can possibly change leadership.
It is almost July (much closer to election day than February) and Justice Kennedy will be stepping down.
McConnell has promised a confirmation vote this fall, before the Senate could possibly change hands.
All that said, they do have the right to replace him this year. But precedent has been set where it can be pushed.
Justice Kennedy is aware of the politics. He chose to step down now. He chose to have this president and this senate pick his successor.
So we have to accept whoever gets confirmed.
But if the Democrats pick up two seats this fall in the Senate (a big if), they can use McConnell's Garland precedent to not confirm any Trump SC nominees in 2019 or 2020.
I think from now on, we will only get new SC Justices when the president and the Senate majority are of the same party.
It's kind of sad how political the supreme court has become. They're really just politicians in black robes at this point. See the 2000 election for exhibit A.
True.
Dear Conservatives: Reminder! The left hates us and wants us dead. They now freely admit it. If they treat us this violently while we are armed, imagine what they will do if we are unarmed. This is why we have a 2nd Amendment.