Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
DiscoGary wrote:
URine Imbecile wrote:
You are an idiot. Do you think union staff work for free? Do "republican" workers want the benefits of a union without paying for those benefits? You really are an idiot.
Do you think the CATO Institute , Heritage Foundation, and NRA staff work for free? Democrats benefit from their efforts. Should they be forced to pay dues to those activist organizations?
But please! Heap the insults on me today! Pour it on guys. Vent your anger if you have to ... as long as I don't have to fund it.
Of course the union bosses are already threatening to "take it to the streets", which means they will get violent as they always do. I don't think it will work this time because the unions have burned all the good will they used to have. Their day is done.
You analogy is false. Employees get monetary benefits from unions. The institutions do no such thing. They do not put money back into worker's pockets.
You are jumping for joy now that worker pay will decrease, benefits will disappear, layoffs will at the will of the company--the very reasons unions came into being. Sure, tRump hates unions because he is forced to treat his resort workers as human beings and not slaves.
Gravy wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/04/27/after-north-korea-triumph-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-not-obama.amp.htmlTrump may be an idiot, but he's a genius compared to warmonger Obama.
[/quote]
Satellite images show North Korea upgrading nuclear research facility: report
I thought the mere presence of Trump (after Pence tells the world we're going to go Libya on NK.) was going to de-escalate NK?
What happened Conservative Justice Warriors? The world's leaders are mocking the American clown.
Are the Conservative Justice Warriors going to pay for all the jobs lost as a result of Trump's losing every trade war he started?
When does the winning start?
NRA? wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Do you think the CATO Institute , Heritage Foundation, and NRA staff work for free? Democrats benefit from their efforts. Should they be forced to pay dues to those activist organizations?
But please! Heap the insults on me today! Pour it on guys. Vent your anger if you have to ... as long as I don't have to fund it.
Of course the union bosses are already threatening to "take it to the streets", which means they will get violent as they always do. I don't think it will work this time because the unions have burned all the good will they used to have. Their day is done.
You analogy is false. Employees get monetary benefits from unions. The institutions do no such thing. They do not put money back into worker's pockets.
You are jumping for joy now that worker pay will decrease, benefits will disappear, layoffs will at the will of the company--the very reasons unions came into being. Sure, tRump hates unions because he is forced to treat his resort workers as human beings and not slaves.
So you agree with the policy of forcing people to pay dues to an organization they don't want to join? You support forcing people to fund political activism they disagree with?
This is the fault of Liberals who co-opted the collective bargaining effort and corrupted it to support all their Liberal causes. Had they not done that, and left the union dues to strictly pay for salary and benefit negotiations, then this ruling never would have come down.
I think it's time I explained the Liberal process of "shoveling credibility into the furnace of power".
DiscoGary wrote:
Do you think the CATO Institute , Heritage Foundation, and NRA staff work for free? Democrats benefit from their efforts. Should they be forced to pay dues to those activist organizations?
Isn't it great that the Heritage Foundation's pet project, the State of Kansas is going so well? Oh, wait, it's not. At all.
How are those dirty liberal economic and labor policy States doing? They are expanding faster than Kansas and have been expanding faster than Kansas.
Don't let facts get in the way of your religion, Gary!
DiscoGary wrote:
So you agree with the policy of forcing people to pay dues to an organization they don't want to join? You support forcing people to fund political activism they disagree with?.
1. They were never "paying dues."
2. They never had to join.
3. The workers benefited from the Union's efforts.
4. This isn't political activism.
The way you swallow propaganda whole should be a concern to you.
DiscoGary wrote:I think it's time I explained the Liberal process of "shoveling credibility into the furnace of power".
Explain to me how that works. Who is doing what and why? And how is it different than what's happening on the Right?
It sure sounds cool though!
The Supreme Court delivered a death blow to public sector unions. Yuuuuuuge. This is thanks to Trump for nominating Gorsuch. Free speech wins, America wins.
M-A-G-A!!!
DiscoGary wrote:
I think it's time I explained the Liberal process of "shoveling credibility into the furnace of power".
Oh now this will certainly be a treat. Do proceed
DiscoGary wrote:
NRA? wrote:
You analogy is false. Employees get monetary benefits from unions. The institutions do no such thing. They do not put money back into worker's pockets.
You are jumping for joy now that worker pay will decrease, benefits will disappear, layoffs will at the will of the company--the very reasons unions came into being. Sure, tRump hates unions because he is forced to treat his resort workers as human beings and not slaves.
So you agree with the policy of forcing people to pay dues to an organization they don't want to join? You support forcing people to fund political activism they disagree with?
This is the fault of Liberals who co-opted the collective bargaining effort and corrupted it to support all their Liberal causes. Had they not done that, and left the union dues to strictly pay for salary and benefit negotiations, then this ruling never would have come down.
I think it's time I explained the Liberal process of "shoveling credibility into the furnace of power".
I am not a Liberal, moran. I am pro blue-collar worker rights. The people that will get hurt the most are Trump voters in the rust belt. You are in glee-mode about that. Shame on you.
Conservatives : "There's no more good manufacturing jobs!" Also Conservatives :
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The Supreme Court delivered a death blow to public sector unions. Yuuuuuuge. This is thanks to Trump for nominating Gorsuch. Free speech wins, America wins.
M-A-G-A!!!
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Do you think the CATO Institute , Heritage Foundation, and NRA staff work for free? Democrats benefit from their efforts. Should they be forced to pay dues to those activist organizations?
Isn't it great that the Heritage Foundation's pet project, the State of Kansas is going so well? Oh, wait, it's not. At all.
How are those dirty liberal economic and labor policy States doing? They are expanding faster than Kansas and have been expanding faster than Kansas.
Don't let facts get in the way of your religion, Gary!
It is obvious the GeorgeGary is an anti-tax nut. That is why he supports Trump -- in the hope that he gets to keep all his money and magically gets to use as many services as he can for FREE. Gary is brain damaged.
Flagpole wrote:
Avid Listener wrote:
I was a journalist for 22 years in D.C. and NOVA. I know what I'm talking about.
Good for you. Seems you should know about having to ask the same or similar question several times to try to get an answer then. I was also a journalist for a long time and have been in many press rooms.
Her behavior is not normal in those briefings, and often it is unacceptable behavior...a tone that has come down from the Orange one.
As I'm sure you know (being a fellow journalist), asking the same or similar questions over again rarely nets you accurate information once someone has answered or deflected. Also, asking questions just to get a quote is lazy journalism. I'm sure you knew that as well, fellow journalist.
If you don't think there is rampant sexism in the White House briefing room, you never worked a day in D.C.
Actually, her tone is very similar to her predecessors. Perhaps, a bit snarky at times, but not different from others who have been in her position.
For those wondering how the Janus decision happened it's your lucky day because I know exactly how it happened.
First you need to know that the Liberal political movement exists via the process of "shoveling credibility into the furnace of power". This is the highest level "strategy" in the Liberal playbook. The victims vs villains game is one "tactic" among many. So let's look at the big picture.
Liberals find something with credibility, political capitol, something with inherent value, something with good will attached to it then they:
1. Control it.
2. Corrupt it.
3. Convert it.
4. Consume it.
5. Find something else of value to shovel into the furnace of power.
For example, let's look at teachers. They used to have the reputation as society's martyrs. They worked long hours for almost nothing while building the next generation of responsible citizens out of the brats sent to them. Teachers had a huge amount of good will and untapped political capitol attached to them.
1. Control it. Liberals saw this as an opportunity and unionized the teachers. In this way they got control of the "good will" attached to them and began using that good will to get more benefits and higher wages. So far so good.
2. Corrupt it. But it didn't stop there as it never does. They used their control over the teachers to corrupt the curriculum to push their Liberal causes and route the union dues to Liberal activists and politicians.
3. Convert it. Of course people see this happening, and as it goes on and on, many people stop seeing teachers as society's martyrs and start seeing them as political enemies. The good will is being converted to Liberal political power.
4. Consume it. Eventually all the good will has been converted to political power, and their is no more to burn. At that point Liberals are forced to find something else of value to shovel into their furnace of power.
If you look at what Liberals do at the highest level you will find that EVERYTHING of value in the country is either being converted to Liberal power or its being savagely attacked in an attempt to destroy it. What Liberals can not convert, they destroy.
Well, the union worker's good will and political capitol has been used up. It's been converted to decades of Dem/Lib power, and it's gone now. Appeals to the martyr status of union workers are not going to work anymore.
Union workers should blame the Libs who corrupted their cause.
Flagpole wrote:
Avid Listener wrote:
I was a journalist for 22 years in D.C. and NOVA. I know what I'm talking about.
Good for you. Seems you should know about having to ask the same or similar question several times to try to get an answer then. I was also a journalist for a long time and have been in many press rooms.
Her behavior is not normal in those briefings, and often it is unacceptable behavior...a tone that has come down from the Orange one.
Where did you go to J-school?
Forcing federal workers to pay union fees (and fund your democrat party campaigns) is political extortion. It was a rigged system financing the Democratic Party. THE GRAVY-TRAIN HAS ENDED. Here's a radical idea, start fundraising.
M-A-G-A!!!
ObviousGary wrote:
(1) It is obvious the GeorgeGary is an anti-tax nut. That is why he supports Trump -- in the hope that he gets to keep all his money and magically gets to use as many services as he can for FREE. (2) Gary is brain damaged.
You are badly mistaken on (1).
But
You are correct on (2).
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Forcing federal workers to pay union fees (and fund your democrat party campaigns) is political extortion. It was a rigged system financing the Democratic Party. THE GRAVY-TRAIN HAS ENDED. Here's a radical idea, start fundraising.
M-A-G-A!!!
Wrong. Fed workers not required to pay union dues.
Right. You are an idiot and a moron.
Yesterday, at the Repubtard hated restaurant they politely asked Sarah Sanders to leave:
Two women and a man showed up with a bullhorn, holding signs with harsh anti-gay messages. The Red Hen’s owner, Wilkinson, in her only interview over the weekend, had told The Washington Post that several of her staffers were gay and were uncomfortable serving Sanders because she defended Trump’s desire to ban transgender people from the military. The group with the bullhorn seized on that.
“This town is full of people who don’t know Jesus Christ and rebel against Jesus Christ through their sins,” shouted Dianna Orea, 50. Saying she was from Michigan but traveled the country preaching, she held a sign that said “LGBT — Let God Burn Them.” Her companion, Edgar Orea, began railing against “Sodomites.”
Wayne and Jennings [Republicans protesting Sarah's being asked to leave], [who were carrying] Confederate flags, quickly crossed the street to get away from the anti-gay sloganeers. “We don’t want anything to do with that crazy religious bigot stuff,” Wayne said.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
So you agree with the policy of forcing people to pay dues to an organization they don't want to join? You support forcing people to fund political activism they disagree with?.
1. They were never "paying dues."
2. They never had to join.
3. The workers benefited from the Union's efforts.
4. This isn't political activism.
The way you swallow propaganda whole should be a concern to you.
The Supreme Court disagreed. Wait until Kennedy retires, it's going to get much worse for you. Trump is going to make your heads explode even more, haha!
“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical” - Thomas Jefferson