Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Reasonable Republican wrote:

blah ... blah ... blah

HI JAMINLOPER!!!

How are you "boys" doing?

You're ALL right wing on trade. Dumdums

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

I wish the other thread wasn't deleted. There were plenty of Bernie voters posting and they should be feelin' "TheTrump" now!

Hey Trollminator, why did you support Bernie's trade policy and hate Trump's? Please explain.

That’s an easy one. I already said I don’t disagree China has gotten an advantageous deal, so I am not against doing something different. In that regard I support the idea that Trump is trying something new. However, Bernie did not sell us on tariffs, this is right from his page:

“develop trade policies which demand that American corporations create jobs here, and not abroad.”

That is not even close to what Trump is doing. Trump is playing chicken with our economy and stock market, putting the whole system at risk when other more constructive options are on the table.

Btw - unlike you psycho trumpers, I don’t support every single thing my preferred candidate does. So even though I’m a Bernie supporter I disagree we should force US firms to keep jobs here. That’s a main problem with your kind - you aren’t not even single issue voters, you are simply for anything your orange god does because he sticks it to libs.

And you are against things you were once for just because Trump supports them.

The sad thing is that you didn’t even realize this.

I was right. Nailed it.

Enlighten me please - what was I once for that now I’m against?

The back to back posts give it away, you don’t need to post more of the same under different handles to make it look like there are more of you, we know it’s just Rigged and Gary.

1101 wrote:

TRUMPERS ARE NOT AMERICANS!

CLINTONETTES ARE NOT AMERICANS

1102 wrote:

TRUMPERS ARE NOT AMERICANS!

CLINTONETTES ARE NOT AMERICANS

Trollminator wrote:

The back to back posts give it away, you don’t need to post more of the same under different handles to make it look like there are more of you, we know it’s just Rigged and Gary.

No it's not. You are the most ignorant liberal turd on this thread. Grow a pair.

Laughatyouaminator wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

The back to back posts give it away, you don’t need to post more of the same under different handles to make it look like there are more of you, we know it’s just Rigged and Gary.

No it's not. You are the most ignorant liberal turd on this thread. Grow a pair.

Thanks for confirming

Reasonable Repubilican wrote:

agip wrote:

it's completely possible to agree that China is not playing fair with trade and to argue that Trump's 'win a trade war' strategy is completely bonkers and counterproductive.

China doesn't play fair.

But

Europe and Canada do play fair, for the most part, so Trump is being just a traitor there. Following his orders to bust up the North Atlantic allied command.

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

join the frickin' TPP, strenghthen NAFTA, strengthen US-European ties. Then have all these non-China players call Beijing and say 'hey. Man. We have a giant, giant trading block. Huge. You want to play? Here are the rules.'

Instead we left TPP, we are leaving NAFTA, we are weakening euro-US trade. Totally the opposite of what we should have done. Trump is a true moran.

DiscoGary wrote:

agip wrote:

not fired.

during the internal investigation he was escorted from the building.

Oh. That makes sense. Firing a corrupt Democrat agent from the FBI doesn't fit into their current see-no-evil-when-it-comes-to-taking-down-Trump ethos.

I'm thinking you forgot that the IJ report found nothing done wrong by agents against trump. Honest mistake, I'm sure. I'll let you off the hook.

agip wrote:

Reasonable Repubilican wrote:

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

join the frickin' TPP, strenghthen NAFTA, strengthen US-European ties. Then have all these non-China players call Beijing and say 'hey. Man. We have a giant, giant trading block. Huge. You want to play? Here are the rules.'

Instead we left TPP, we are leaving NAFTA, we are weakening euro-US trade. Totally the opposite of what we should have done. Trump is a true moran.

Slow the fvck down! These trumpers aren’t actually expecting answers - you’ll break their brains!

L L wrote:

Maybe go after Apple and Nike.

Yes, this. Trade agreements need to ensure corporate accountability so that they can't shop around the globe for the cheapest, most easily exploited labor they can find. There need to be minimum labor standards, more robust regulatory enforcement, and giant multi-nationals need to be held legally responsible for their supply chains. If workers aren't protected abroad, they can't really be protected here, either. Unfortunately, it's hard to build international worker solidarity when roughly half the country sees foreign workers as job-stealing, sh*thole dwellers, rather than allies against the global corporate race to the bottom.

Haha dude literally 2 pages ago you were ripping Trump for putting $200 billion in additional tariffs on China. Now you you say you support the idea that he is trying something new with China. This is to funny!!

Actually a quick google search will tell you that Bernie absolutely promised to impose steel tariffs on China during his 2016 campaign. He also did not support the TPP and wanted to restructure NAFTA (sound familiar). So yes Trump and Bernie are very similar on Trade. So either you are a very uninformed voter or you are all of a sudden against these positions because Trump is doing them but don't want to directly admit that.

What more constructive options? it would be nice if you guys brought ideas to the table rather than just complaining about everything the guy does and making vague references to more "constructive options"?

And you disagree with everything Trump does whats the difference? Prove me wrong and name 5 positive things he's done.

I look forward to your response.

agip wrote:

Reasonable Repubilican wrote:

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

join the frickin' TPP, strenghthen NAFTA, strengthen US-European ties. Then have all these non-China players call Beijing and say 'hey. Man. We have a giant, giant trading block. Huge. You want to play? Here are the rules.'

Instead we left TPP, we are leaving NAFTA, we are weakening euro-US trade. Totally the opposite of what we should have done. Trump is a true moran.

Fair enough. Why didn't Obama do it? he had 8 years.

Im glad we agree that China is playing unfair though its good to find common ground.

Reasonable Republican wrote:

agip wrote:

Trump is a true moran.

Fair enough. Why didn't Obama do it? he had 8 years.

What? Why didn't Obama chose to be a moran? Because Obama's IQ is triple that of Trump's IQ of 45.

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

L L wrote:

Maybe go after Apple and Nike.

Yes, this. Trade agreements need to ensure corporate accountability so that they can't shop around the globe for the cheapest, most easily exploited labor they can find. There need to be minimum labor standards, more robust regulatory enforcement, and giant multi-nationals need to be held legally responsible for their supply chains. If workers aren't protected abroad, they can't really be protected here, either. Unfortunately, it's hard to build international worker solidarity when roughly half the country sees foreign workers as job-stealing, sh*thole dwellers, rather than allies against the global corporate race to the bottom.

Good idea on paper. But how would you get China or India for example to agree to rules and regulations that would hurt their economies and benefit the US?