Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

So what I hear from you is that anything Trump does is OK with you and is defensible.

I can like most things that Bernie wants and not like others.

I like most things Hillary wants and not like others.

Hillary voted to go into Iraq. I was absolutely against her decision to that. And that was one main reason why I voted for Obama over her in the 2008 primary.

Now I did vote for Hillary over Bernie in 2016 because I thought her views were more centrist and her policies would more align with more Americans.

I was concerned that Bernie had great ideas that simply had no chance of passing votes in a divided Congress.

Trump is doing as much without Congressional approval as he can, though.

You are lining up in that cult of followers.

No need to think. Just agree with Trump on everything.

Yes and which fvcking political party was against that happening 10 years ago?

you got a nerve wrote:

Reasonable Republican wrote:

Then why would 45% of your party (likely some of the posters on here as well) vote for someone that would have had the same policies as Trump on trade maybe even more aggressive? Bernie Sanders you may remember him he would have won your primary had it not been rigged against him which is kind of funny because he probably would have beaten Trump.

Like it or not this is exactly what Trump promised to do and atleast hes trying to fix the problem. A problem that a lot of his supporters (and 45% of the democratic base apparently) thinks is a major issue.

You know what else never happened once before Trump was elected? A President of the US meeting with North Korea.

Thanks for playing.

Yes and which fvcking political party was against that happening 10 years ago?

How times have changed.

Thanks for playing

Nice deflection why can't you answer the question. Why did 45% of your party vote for a candidate (Bernie) that supported almost identically the same trade policies that Trump is implementing? Clearly a lot of working class voters in your party agree that the trade deficit is a problem and that tariffs are the way to solve it based on their votes for Bernie.

you got a nerve wrote:

you got a nerve wrote:

Yes and which fvcking political party was against that happening 10 years ago?

How times have changed.

Thanks for playing

Fair point. But shouldn't you be happy that this is an area that we can find common ground. Are you supportive of Trump's trade policy?

Hey, I just couldn't resist. Saw this on my phone. Yep, he wasn't biased, LMAO!!. Ok, I'm really done for today.

but, but, but the illegal alien kids, cry the libs.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/19/peter-strzok-escorted-out-fbi-building-reports/

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Hey, I just couldn't resist. Saw this on my phone. Yep, he wasn't biased, LMAO!!. Ok, I'm really done for today.

but, but, but the illegal alien kids, cry the libs.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/19/peter-strzok-escorted-out-fbi-building-reports/

What?! The FBI finally decided to fire someone who tried to use his position to ensure Trump wouldn't get elected? I'm shocked! Shocked I say, to find any standards of behavior being upheld in the FBI.

What did he do to get thrown out? Pis on the toilet seat?

DiscoGary wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Hey, I just couldn't resist. Saw this on my phone. Yep, he wasn't biased, LMAO!!. Ok, I'm really done for today.

but, but, but the illegal alien kids, cry the libs.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/19/peter-strzok-escorted-out-fbi-building-reports/

What?! The FBI finally decided to fire someone who tried to use his position to ensure Trump wouldn't get elected? I'm shocked! Shocked I say, to find any standards of behavior being upheld in the FBI.

What did he do to get thrown out? Pis on the toilet seat?

not fired.

during the internal investigation he was escorted from the building.

Reasonable Republican wrote:

[

Nice deflection why can't you answer the question. Why did 45% of your party vote for a candidate (Bernie) that supported almost identically the same trade policies that Trump is implementing?

Because people vote based on more than one issue.

(and it's not identical policies anyway. )

They liked Bernie's tax policy better.

Trump lied about his policy anyway.

He said he would sign a tax law that wouldn't be good for him, believe him.

Jeff Sessions in trouble with his church for being heartless.

it's completely possible to agree that China is not playing fair with trade and to argue that Trump's 'win a trade war' strategy is completely bonkers and counterproductive.

China doesn't play fair.

But

Europe and Canada do play fair, for the most part, so Trump is being just a traitor there. Following his orders to bust up the North Atlantic allied command.

agip wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

What?! The FBI finally decided to fire someone who tried to use his position to ensure Trump wouldn't get elected? I'm shocked! Shocked I say, to find any standards of behavior being upheld in the FBI.

What did he do to get thrown out? Pis on the toilet seat?

not fired.

during the internal investigation he was escorted from the building.

Oh. That makes sense. Firing a corrupt Democrat agent from the FBI doesn't fit into their current see-no-evil-when-it-comes-to-taking-down-Trump ethos.

L L wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/19/politics/sessions-church-complaint/index.html

Jeff Sessions in trouble with his church for being heartless.

Churches are all-in on illegal immigration. They see it as a way to fill the seats.

agip wrote:

it's completely possible to agree that China is not playing fair with trade and to argue that Trump's 'win a trade war' strategy is completely bonkers and counterproductive.

China doesn't play fair.

But

Europe and Canada do play fair, for the most part, so Trump is being just a traitor there. Following his orders to bust up the North Atlantic allied command.

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

DiscoGary wrote:

Churches are all-in on illegal immigration. They see it as a way to fill the seats.

Fair point

L L wrote:

Reasonable Republican wrote:

[

Nice deflection why can't you answer the question. Why did 45% of your party vote for a candidate (Bernie) that supported almost identically the same trade policies that Trump is implementing?

Because people vote based on more than one issue.

(and it's not identical policies anyway. )

They liked Bernie's tax policy better.

Trump lied about his policy anyway.

He said he would sign a tax law that wouldn't be good for him, believe him.

How would they have been different policies? Give me examples.

Democrats burned all the credibility the FBI ever had in an attempt to take down Trump, and failed. Now the FBI has no credibility. Until the FBI conducts a major purge, clears its ranks of partisan Democrats, and punishes those who abused their power, I am going to continue to refer to them as the corrupt national joke they currently are. You can throw a thousand gallons of white-wash on this FBI scandal but the place still stinks with the rot of injustice, and I'm going to keep pointing that out.

Reasonable Repubilican wrote:

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

Maybe you want to define "the problem" first.

The economy is moving well, right?

So what are you trying to fix?

Trump hates the trade deficit.

But a trade deficit is simply one entity buying more from another than they buy from you.

I have a trade deficit with the grocery store.

I could make my own food but it's more time efficient for me to work for money and buy food from them.

The problem isn't having a trade deficit with China as much as what China has leveraged to get there.

They don't have a minimum wage. Their working conditions are horrible.

But we are addicted to the cheap goods.

Maybe go after Apple and Nike.

L L wrote:

Reasonable Repubilican wrote:

Ok so you disagree with Trump, how would you solve the problem?

Maybe you want to define "the problem" first.

The economy is moving well, right?

So what are you trying to fix?

Trump hates the trade deficit.

But a trade deficit is simply one entity buying more from another than they buy from you.

I have a trade deficit with the grocery store.

I could make my own food but it's more time efficient for me to work for money and buy food from them.

The problem isn't having a trade deficit with China as much as what China has leveraged to get there.

They don't have a minimum wage. Their working conditions are horrible.

But we are addicted to the cheap goods.

Maybe go after Apple and Nike.

God, are you stupid.