Where are all the studies "proving" other things are not responsible for autism? Pollution, foods, etc?
The establishment seems very invested in saying its not vaccines.
Which means it probably is.
This is the same esablishment that denied Covid could have come from a lab, forced untested emergency use experiments "vaccines" on Americans, shut down schools, gyms, beaches while allowing Amazon, Walmart, liquor stores to remain open, made up a 6 foot "social" distancing rule, claimed $5 face masks would keep us safe, prevented families from visiting the elderly in nursing homes and hospitals.
They are corrupt and not looking out for us
Remember, the more studies that show no link between two things, the more likely those two things are linked! - Newname
I'm no scientist but can someone please ELI5 how some vaccinations cause these specific side effects?
What about the MMR shots cause autism?
Why does the Covid vax (not sure if this applies to all or just certain ones) cause "turbo cancers?" If there's something specific in there that does it, shouldn't we be able to isolate that and use the knowledge to actually treat cancer?
What does the flu shot do? What about tetanus? Should RFK be investigating these too?
I'm no scientist but can someone please ELI5 how some vaccinations cause these specific side effects?
What about the MMR shots cause autism?
Why does the Covid vax (not sure if this applies to all or just certain ones) cause "turbo cancers?" If there's something specific in there that does it, shouldn't we be able to isolate that and use the knowledge to actually treat cancer?
What does the flu shot do? What about tetanus? Should RFK be investigating these too?
I think he wants tests done on MMR and other vaccines.
Example. MMR shots given to tens of thousands of kids and not given to tens of thousands of kids. From a homogenous group
1. What is the impact on contracting measles.
But also, step 2.
2. What are the overall health outcomes of the 2 groups? If MMR is 95% effective in preventing measles...but is accompanied by increases in other issues (cancers, autism, heart problems, whatever) we need to know this.
Seems to be a lot of fear that RFK will find the cause or causes of autism epidemic.
No one on here has expressed fear that RFK will find the cause of autism.
I think the concern (wouldn’t call it a fear) expressed in this thread is that RFK Jr. had already “found” the cause of autism before he took the job. He made his conclusions—in fact wrote books about his conclusions and made money talking about his conclusions—without having a science background or doing any primary research himself. The concern is that his conclusions are driving the “results” and not the other way around. In other words, the exact opposite of the scientific method. He is practicing propaganda, not science. In fact, one of the top metabolism researchers employed by HHS just resigned after the Department—under RFK Jr.’s leadership tried to suppress and downplay the results of one of his recent studies which didn’t show a definitive link between the know mechanisms of addition in the brain and the consumption of ultra processed foods.
No one on here has expressed fear that RFK will find the cause of autism.
I think the concern (wouldn’t call it a fear) expressed in this thread is that RFK Jr. had already “found” the cause of autism before he took the job. He made his conclusions—in fact wrote books about his conclusions and made money talking about his conclusions—
He never said that.
More lies and smears
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as Health and Human Services Secretary, has not claimed to have found the definitive cause for the reported increase in autism rates. He has, however, made statements asserting that autism is caused by environmental toxins and has pledged to identify these causes by September 2025
I think the concern (wouldn’t call it a fear) expressed in this thread is that RFK Jr. had already “found” the cause of autism before he took the job. He made his conclusions—in fact wrote books about his conclusions and made money talking about his conclusions—
He never said that.
More lies and smears
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as Health and Human Services Secretary, has not claimed to have found the definitive cause for the reported increase in autism rates. He has, however, made statements asserting that autism is caused by environmental toxins and has pledged to identify these causes by September 2025
How could he possibly know when his department would have results by? Again, he is not a scientist and this is not how research works. Anyone with any experience in primary research, that understands the research process, and that understands the scientific method knows it is almost never possible to predict results let alone when one will have those definitive results in advance.
I'm no scientist but can someone please ELI5 how some vaccinations cause these specific side effects?
What about the MMR shots cause autism?
Why does the Covid vax (not sure if this applies to all or just certain ones) cause "turbo cancers?" If there's something specific in there that does it, shouldn't we be able to isolate that and use the knowledge to actually treat cancer?
What does the flu shot do? What about tetanus? Should RFK be investigating these too?
I am also NOT a scientist.
No kids. Never had to make a decision about MMR. Don't have an opinion.
Covid mRNA vaccines have been in use for less than 4 years. Much remains unknown.
Flu shots are dependent upon the seasonal formulation. The flu vax was way off for the season that just ended. A poor match. Ineffective .
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as Health and Human Services Secretary, has not claimed to have found the definitive cause for the reported increase in autism rates. He has, however, made statements asserting that autism is caused by environmental toxins and has pledged to identify these causes by September 2025
How could he possibly know when his department would have results by? Again, he is not a scientist and this is not how research works. Anyone with any experience in primary research, that understands the research process, and that understands the scientific method knows it is almost never possible to predict results let alone when one will have those definitive results in advance.
"did not pass peer review" is literally what debunked means.
Experts considered the evidence and rejected the paper as being unscientific. What else could debunked mean?
"Debunked" can be applied to the paper, or it can be applied to the hypothesis. i grant that the scientific community has debunked the paper. he didnt follow the correct procdures.
But "debunked" can also be applied to the hypothesis, and here it would mean that they found the real cause of autism and it wasnt vaccines. This hasnt happened.
Because something wasnt proven once doesnt mean that that it has been disproven.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.