Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

DiscoGary wrote:

WE? wrote:

WE? Who is this WE you keep using? WE would mean everyone agrees with your view. Are you mentally deranged to the point of thinking that your WE means the majority of people in the US?

WE just won an election, so yes.

In which not even a majority of voters voted for your candidate. Thanks for playing, moran.

A Quinnipiac poll released Monday found that 27 percent of registered voters support and 66 percent oppose the Trump administration of immediately prosecuting parents who cross the border to seek asylum and separating them from their children.

“The President should immediately end this family separation policy,” Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said.

Rep. Will Hurd (R-Tex.) said: “Kids are being separated. . . . In the last two months, there’s been about2,000. The previous year it was almost 700. And 100 of those kids were under the age of 4.”

Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R) said the forced separations of families, which his office decried as “inhumane.” And, “Governor Baker directed the National Guard not to send any assets or personnel to the Southwest border today because the federal government’s current actions are resulting in the inhumane treatment of children,” Lizzy Guyton, Baker’s communications director, said in a statement.

Jeb Bush (R): The president is pursuing a “heartless policy”.

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich) called what had transpired “ugly and inhumane”.

DiscoGary wrote:

WE? wrote:

Oh, delusional one. YOU now speak for all voters. Did WE speak for you while OBAMA was president? Please do tell.

No one spoke for me while Obama was President. That's why Trump won.

And now YOU claim to speak for EVERYONE? Come on George, you can troll better than that.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Wait, so taking these illegal immigrant kids away from their parents will pull 13 million children out of poverty? Or will it give homes to 1.6 million homeless children?

Because unless it does one of these things then your post is nothing more than a ginormous, irrelevant whataboutism.

Could you please try to think before posting? It is somewhat painful to read your nonsensical BS.

Thanks in advance.

See my earlier post. Keep the families together by turning them away from the border.

And see my earlier post how turning them away at the border is turning them towards the serious danger they are fleeing.

But they're not Americans, so you don't care.

Shut up, democrat.

classic conservative senator ben sasse calls this trump policy wicked. he won't sign on to the law the dems want, but he is right to put a moral stamp on this human disaster.

why won't the lrc 'conservatives' also condemn it on moral standards?

clue:

if trump did one of his many flips and ended the policy tomorrow, gary and rigged would ALSO be against it.

they're trumpkins, they do what trump does. Because it owns the libs.

Sasse, R-Nebraska: "7) The administration’s decision to separate families is a new, discretionary choice. Anyone saying that their hands are tied or that the only conceivable way to fix the problem of catch-and-release is to rip families apart is flat wrong. There are other options available to them. The other options are all messy (given that some overly prescriptive judges have limited their administrative options), but there are ways to address this that are less bad than the policy of family separation they’ve chosen."

You're not going to shut Democrats up.

Blue wave coming.

Then the big blue wave in 2020 with about 20 to 10 Republican to Democrat seats up for grabs.

I know it's the opposite this year but Republican support is weak this year.

There will be a Democrat senator from Texas elected this year.

Bye bye Ted Cruz.

L L wrote:

You're not going to shut Democrats up.

Blue wave coming.

Then the big blue wave in 2020 with about 20 to 10 Republican to Democrat seats up for grabs.

I know it's the opposite this year but Republican support is weak this year.

There will be a Democrat senator from Texas elected this year.

Bye bye Ted Cruz.

Not going to happen, democrat.

NotGonnaDoIt wrote:

Not going to happen, democrat.

Are you saying 0% chance?

L L wrote:

NotGonnaDoIt wrote:

Not going to happen, democrat.

Are you saying 0% chance?

You just linked an article that says that Democrats will probably take over the House and that more voters on average prefer Democrats over Republicans.

The big factor in the upcoming election is when will Mueller's report come out.

It needs to come out by the end of August as to not interfere too much with the election - maybe Sep 15 at the latest.

If September comes and goes with no report filing, it won't come out until after the election.

I think voters would like to see it before they vote, though.

And if it finds no wrongdoing by Trump, that will be great for Republicans.

So - Republicans and Trump supporters alike, do you want Muller to release his findings before or after the election coming this November?

Goldman Sachs is not a political analysis firm. They are an investment banker. Goldman Sachs also stated: US Fiscal Policy Will Lead To A Debt Catastrophehttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-19/us-fiscal-policy-set-blow-us-economy-goldman

ShutUpDemocrat wrote:

L L wrote:

Are you saying 0% chance?

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/18/goldman-sachs-chances-of-a-democrat-blue-wave-in-november-are-diminishing.html

L L wrote:

The big factor in the upcoming election is when will Mueller's report come out.

It needs to come out by the end of August as to not interfere too much with the election - maybe Sep 15 at the latest.

If September comes and goes with no report filing, it won't come out until after the election.

I think voters would like to see it before they vote, though.

And if it finds no wrongdoing by Trump, that will be great for Republicans.

So - Republicans and Trump supporters alike, do you want Muller to release his findings before or after the election coming this November?

Hello Hillary lover. Still butt hurt?

Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns.

If you're going to quote me, then answer the question:

Do you want Muller to release his findings before or after the election coming this November?

The reality is that the FBI worked hard to get tRump elected in 2016.

The FBI’s New York office was by numerous accounts the epicenter of an effort to undermine Clinton through leaks to the media and prominent Republicans. As one report put it just before the election, “Deep antipathy to Hillary Clinton exists within the FBI, multiple bureau sources have told the Guardian, spurring a rapid series of leaks damaging to her campaign just days before the election.”

As one agent put it, “The FBI is Trumpland.”

A former Justice Department official told Vanity Fair in 2017, “It was widely understood that there was a faction in [the New York] office that couldn’t stand her and was out to get her.”

There were agents leaking information about investigations into the Clinton Foundation to none other than Rudy Giuliani, who would then go and air the charges on Fox News.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/06/18/there-may-have-been-an-fbi-conspiracy-involving-the-2016-election-but-not-the-one-you-think/

L L wrote:

The big factor in the upcoming election is when will Mueller's report come out.

It needs to come out by the end of August as to not interfere too much with the election - maybe Sep 15 at the latest.

If September comes and goes with no report filing, it won't come out until after the election.

I think voters would like to see it before they vote, though.

And if it finds no wrongdoing by Trump, that will be great for Republicans.

So - Republicans and Trump supporters alike, do you want Muller to release his findings before or after the election coming this November?

You mean so the report does not APPEAR to interfere with the midterms. This is a problem I have with the Dems, playing too nice and making sure not to appear biased. They need to do what’s in their power to crush this @sshat. Obama didn’t act on the Russian meddling out of fear of appearing to help Hillary, when he should have done what was in the interest of national security and helped blow the whole thing wide open right in the middle of the election. Mueller isn’t a democrat and democrats have zero say in when the report is released but I sure hope if it happens to be ready right in the middle of the midterms then it should come out, good or bad. The mister nice guy bull$hit has to stop.

You are sounding more than a little bit like Lying Gary.

I'm all for releasing the report as soon as possible- it will show no Russian collusion & no Trump indictment.

Hey libs, Trump's job approval keeps going up.

ttps://

The Flagpolian Flop is coming

Mueller never

Clownpole forever