Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

DiscoGary wrote:

Intellectually and emotionally incapable of seeing the other side.

That is 100% true about you.

DiscoGary wrote:

Uh, I believe she was Secretary of State at the time.

What? Hillary was Secretary of State two weeks BEFORE the election. LOL.

Red Shoe Diaries wrote:

The unemployment rate has surged to record lows under Trump.

A report just came out that we may actually see that 4% GDP growth this quarter.

Thanks Obama!

Meanwhile, the current President cares nothing for rules.

The complaint states that the board didn’t hold a formal meeting for at least 18 years, from 1999 until 2017, in violation of state law.

And is perfectly willing to steal from veterans.

The lawsuit alleges that out of the $5.6 million raised during that fundraiser, roughly $2.8 million was shifted to the Trump Foundation.

Did you see what I did there? I could write fiction for Fox or Breidbard.

Whaaaaaaaat? wrote:

agip wrote:

didn't happen under trump so dumb hypothetical. The FBI acted against HRC, not Trump.

next.

Hahahahaha

Acted against Hillary??!! What are you on?! SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED, YOU IGNORAMOUS!!

The leadership at the FBI hated Trump (crapload of evidence now out), and you think they helped him?

If you're being serious, you are a fool.

we have no idea how the leadership of the FBI felt about Trump. We know 2-3 lesser people in the org.

The IG agrees that HRC should not have been indicted.

Comey's public acknowledgment that he was reopening the HRC email investigation, weeks before the election, was a serious act against Hillary.

ok? Can we agree on that?

DiscoGary wrote:

because Democrats run Washington. The swamp will not clean up the swamp .

Further proof that Gary lives on Jupiter. So if Democrats supposedly run Washington when the GOP controls everything, that means the GOP and Trump are always the powerless victims - got it... really, you should definitely teach at Trump U. Even if they were to go broke, they can alwyas pay you directly from their charity, Trump will approve the payment.

DiscoGary wrote:

agip wrote:

but that summary is full of nonsense. It's not facts. HRC was not treated diffently than anyone else. CIVILIANS DO NOT GO TO JAIL FOR BEING SLOPPY WITH CLASSIFIED INFO. She was a civilian. She was not indicted. Totally normal, as the IG agreed.

I'm all for facts. But they have to be correct.

Uh, I believe she was Secretary of State at the time.

secretaries of state are civilians. They are not in the armed forces.

my point is that if someone in the military is sloppy with classified info, he goes to jail.

if someone NOT in the military is sloppy with classified info, he does not go to jail.

DiscoGary wrote:

It's understandable that Dems/Libs can't see Trump as the victim in this.

Gary, if law enforcement pulls you over for speeding and discovers you have no driver's license. Is it a "Deep State conspiracy!"? Has "Government overreached!" ?

one retraction: we do know that comey did not like Trump. So we do know how the director felt about trump. I previously wrote that we don't know how FBI leadership felt about Trump.

agip wrote:

my point is that if someone in the military is sloppy with classified info, he goes to jail.

if someone NOT in the military is sloppy with classified info, he does not go to jail.

It's already been established that multiple Trump administration officials have used personal email for government business.

All is forgiven as there is no law that applies to the Dear Leader.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

agip wrote:

my point is that if someone in the military is sloppy with classified info, he goes to jail.

if someone NOT in the military is sloppy with classified info, he does not go to jail.

It's already been established that multiple Trump administration officials have used personal email for government business.

All is forgiven as there is no law that applies to the Dear Leader.

the difference is that HRC put secret/confidential/classified info into private email. others did not.

The Session DOJ Report wrote:

KEY points from the report that FOX News refuses to mention.

-- Clinton was rightfully exonerated in the email probe.

-- Comey’s decision to criticize Clinton in a July press conference was unjustified.

-- Comey’s decision to reveal that the email probe had reopened was similarly an “error in judgment.”

-- Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were “aggressive” investigators of Hillary Clinton.

-- Using your personal email for work seems incredibly common.

-- Andrew McCabe “did what he was supposed to do” when he didn’t recuse from the Clinton investigation.

They knew all along that would be in the report, but what counts most to the mouth breathers is what FOX and Trump peddle. They peddled that there was an investigation for weeks, and stopped peddling the moment the report was released (coincidentaly the same time trumpers on yhis thread went radio silent on the issue). So the results (facts) are irrelvant as we know, just the accusations. No wonder they are still obessesing over HRC, they say shes guilty because she eas investigated, never mind she was cleared over and over.

agip wrote:

We know 2-3 lesser people in the org.

Who knew the Deep State was less than 5 very low level people in all of national law enforcement! Where's the Briedbard story! ?!?!? That's Pulitzer prize winning stuff!

Let's pretend fascism is the new normal and ignore that public service employees take an oath to the Constitution, not the President. I still want to know when Trump gets the keys to the Deep State. When did Cheney get them? When did Reagan get them? I'm sure Briedbard has published the exact date Obama was assigned control of the Deep State.

DiscoGary wrote:

So no Dem/Libs on here are bothered by the fact that we have high ranking FBI agents stating a desire to influence a presidential election, while in the position to do so, and with loads of evidence that they actually tried?

Sure it bothers me. So if there is all this evidence (I guess you have more than just a text message showing intent), why aren’t investigations yielding results? Your problem is not that your endless suspicion and cynicism, it is that you don’t do what investigative journalists do, which is to then go digging for the truth - talking to people involved, tracing documents and other evidence, finding something substantial. All you do is say there’s a deep state participant and use your trumpian logic to claim it is factual. All nothingburgers.

Trollminator wrote:

They peddled that there was an investigation for weeks, and stopped peddling the moment the report was released (coincidentaly the same time trumpers on yhis thread went radio silent on the issue)

Which, I'd argue is evidence it's paid propaganda. Entirely unlike Gary, the posts follow the week's propaganda very closely. And then there is no meaningful back-and-forth, no continuity at all, also entirely unlike Gary.

It just keeps coming..... We have some baaaad people in the FBI.....

All the keep the outsider from the White House. OOOOOOPS!!

http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/ig-report-fbi-agents-bribed-journalists/?__twitter_impression=true

agip wrote:

one retraction: we do know that comey did not like Trump. So we do know how the director felt about trump. I previously wrote that we don't know how FBI leadership felt about Trump.

Just like we all know Sessions hates black people, but it doesn’t mean he isn’t playing by the rules in his job.

Whaaaaaaaat? wrote:

agip wrote:

didn't happen under trump so dumb hypothetical. The FBI acted against HRC, not Trump.

next.

Hahahahaha

Acted against Hillary??!! What are you on?! SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED, YOU IGNORAMOUS!!

The leadership at the FBI hated Trump (crapload of evidence now out), and you think they helped him?

If you're being serious, you are a fool.

Obviously whatever absolute hatred they had (according to you) did not affect their ability to objectively carry out their job. That is according to your GOP report - give it up this issue is dead.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

agip wrote:

We know 2-3 lesser people in the org.

Who knew the Deep State was less than 5 very low level people in all of national law enforcement! Where's the Briedbard story! ?!?!? That's Pulitzer prize winning stuff!

Let's pretend fascism is the new normal and ignore that public service employees take an oath to the Constitution, not the President. I still want to know when Trump gets the keys to the Deep State. When did Cheney get them? When did Reagan get them? I'm sure Briedbard has published the exact date Obama was assigned control of the Deep State.

Though he didn’t go into details, Gary said Obama still controls the deep state. Think about it man!

agip wrote:

Whaaaaaaaat? wrote:

Hahahahaha

Acted against Hillary??!! What are you on?! SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED, YOU IGNORAMOUS!!

The leadership at the FBI hated Trump (crapload of evidence now out), and you think they helped him?

If you're being serious, you are a fool.

we have no idea how the leadership of the FBI felt about Trump. We know 2-3 lesser people in the org.

The IG agrees that HRC should not have been indicted.

Comey's public acknowledgment that he was reopening the HRC email investigation, weeks before the election, was a serious act against Hillary.

ok? Can we agree on that?

The moment the news broke about "re-opening the case" because of the Weiner laptop, I texted my friends saying, "I guarantee you the Sunday before the election (remember, there was only like a week to go) Comey comes out and says 'nothing there, you can all feel better about voting for her now'." And that's exactly what happened. Suddenly they can complete and investigation in a week.....after not confiscating the server (to this day)." Unreal.

Comey said it himself, he didn't want it to appear that the FBI was hiding anything about Clinton after she won (he believed she would), since it was largely believed (including by many in the FBI) that she should have been indicted.

Smashing all the phones was great theater though. HA