Sad to see liberals putting party over country once again.
Sad to see liberals putting party over country once again.
agip wrote:
Off your rocker wrote:
Regardless of who asked him, don't you think it's a good thing that the remains of soldiers are coming home. Can you at least agree that he is accomplishing something that no POTUS has been able to accomplish in the last 60 years?
Come on. Put country over party for once.
+1
it wasn't thousands, and it wasn't parents. It is probably 100 and children. But it's still a good thing. I'm glad, and it's a bit of a cheap shot going on and on about it.
It's just that Spanky can barely say a paragraph without lying. I mean Obama and HRC lied several times. Trump lies several times a day. The corrosion from his lying and the fact Repubs don't care. it's so sad.
He’s only doing this because he wants votes for midterms and 2020.
Grow up kids wrote:
XY wrote:
And you talk about shame
It is shameful to act as it Trump made fun of a handicapped person *because of* their handicap. He was making fun of him for being spineless, backpeddling and criticizing him. Trump's motions were the exact same motions he used when describing other "stupid" people 3-4 months earlier on the campaign trail. There's plenty of video evidence on YouTube.
Bullsh*t. Even if he had a legitimate grievance he was making fun of the disability. Attacking him for being disabled.
"Women"? Seriously? Women are off limits now? "Boy, the women's [equality] movement just can't make strides in the area of [politics] now, can it?" (Seinfeld ref). Can we only make fun of men now? Oh sorry, I mean, "white men."
Same problem. No one would mind if he had just criticised these women but no, he has to go one step beyond and make sexist remarks. Attacking them for being women.
Which war hero are you talking about? McCain? Or the made up "attack" on one of the Clinton attorney's kids? Either way, he was responding to a verbal attack on him first, so fair game if you ask me.
Once again instead of responding to criticism, no one would have had any problem with that, Trump goes ahead insults all war heros who were captured. Sad.
This isn’t about libs or sjws. It’s about having a few simple standards.
PAGE: "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
STRZOK: "No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
Trollminator wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
It's a grave mistake to commingle the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Your reasoning has nothing to do with any style of democratic governance.
Didn't you know Gary studied politics carefully for decades.. lets take his word for it. What I find most amusing is that his worldview has not become a "solution" for progress... meaning Trump fits with his worldview, and Trump won, so that can only mean he was right all along... never mind the decades over which he wasn't right. What will happen to these folks when Trumpland crashes out?
Declaration of Independence:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
No property rights there, but who cares as you so rightly pointed out, because the Declaration is not our rule book.
Constitution:
14th : "A state shall not violate a citizen's privileges or immunities; shall not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
So it IS in the Constitution, and it's there explicitly.
You both should be embarrassed for not knowing that.
'I do' , take notice how the Constitution, the rule book, gets attacked. Under no circumstances can Dems/Libs allow themselves to be constrained by its limitations. Why push back so hard against rules designed to protect people and guarantee their freedom? There's a good reason for that and it requires an explanation. Human nature has a dark side that the founders knew about as well. You need to include that in your world view. That's up next.
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Didn't you know Gary studied politics carefully for decades.. lets take his word for it. What I find most amusing is that his worldview has not become a "solution" for progress... meaning Trump fits with his worldview, and Trump won, so that can only mean he was right all along... never mind the decades over which he wasn't right. What will happen to these folks when Trumpland crashes out?
'I do' , take notice how the Constitution, the rule book, gets attacked. Under no circumstances can Dems/Libs allow themselves to be constrained by its limitations. Why push back so hard against rules designed to protect people and guarantee their freedom? There's a good reason for that and it requires an explanation. Human nature has a dark side that the founders knew about as well. You need to include that in your world view. That's up next.
are you saying the 27 amendments are errors?
are you saying that the courts should not decide what is constitutional and what isn't?
What the heck are you saying?
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Didn't you know Gary studied politics carefully for decades.. lets take his word for it. What I find most amusing is that his worldview has not become a "solution" for progress... meaning Trump fits with his worldview, and Trump won, so that can only mean he was right all along... never mind the decades over which he wasn't right. What will happen to these folks when Trumpland crashes out?
Why push back so hard against rules designed to protect people and guarantee their freedom? There's a good reason for that and it requires an explanation. Human nature has a dark side that the founders knew about as well. You need to include that in your world view. That's up next.
What about when the rules suck? See 18th Amendment.
Deep state wrote:
PAGE: "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
STRZOK: "No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
So, how did Trump become president? The Deep State tried to stop him. But Putin won it for him, correct?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
And just yesterday they were stepping over each other on this thread in excitement over the release of the report. Nothing but a bunch of suckers. If anything they should investigate Comey's hesitation to officially look into the Russian ties with trump's campaign, considering his timely announcement to push Trump across the finish line first.
There will more info released. The libs as always, celebrate a victory before reaching the finish line.
Lisa Page and Peter Strzok texts:
Page: "Donald Trump is never going to be president, right?"
Strzok: "no he will not, we will stop him"
Not a good show from these two biased fools.
The Flagpolian Flop is coming
The agipian choke is coming
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Nothingburger with fries
agip wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
'I do' , take notice how the Constitution, the rule book, gets attacked. Under no circumstances can Dems/Libs allow themselves to be constrained by its limitations. Why push back so hard against rules designed to protect people and guarantee their freedom? There's a good reason for that and it requires an explanation. Human nature has a dark side that the founders knew about as well. You need to include that in your world view. That's up next.
are you saying the 27 amendments are errors?
are you saying that the courts should not decide what is constitutional and what isn't?
What the heck are you saying?
I am not going to go into a history of the Constitution and its Amendments unless my student asks me. For now you are an excellent example of the ignorant belligerence coming from the left, and for that I thank you. Please don't stop.
When I am done discussing ideology with my student then I will re-engage you all in the messy world of political cheer leading.
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
There will more info released. The libs as always, celebrate a victory before reaching the finish line.
Lisa Page and Peter Strzok texts:
Page: "Donald Trump is never going to be president, right?"
Strzok: "no he will not, we will stop him"
Not a good show from these two biased fools.
The Flagpolian Flop is coming
The agipian choke is coming
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Nothingburger with fries
The Trumpkin Defense: Trump had to collude with Russia in order to defeat the Deep State.
Only in Trumpland. Lose office for being caught as a pervert. Earn even an YUGE percentage of the Trumper vote.
93 percent of North Dakota Republicans voted for a candidate who is now dropping out for being a peeping Tom. Despite being outed on May 20 for charges stemming from a peeping Tom incident, North Dakota’s GOP secretary of state nominee Will Gardner won 93 percent of the vote. Now, he’s officially dropped out of the race.
Here's a good clash..., definitely worth watching. Corey Stewart gets ripped into shreds and was not able to rebut a single simple fact. No wonder trumpers can't stand CNN
I'm actually surprised he dropped out - most of them have no shame.
DiscoGary wrote:
agip wrote:
are you saying the 27 amendments are errors?
are you saying that the courts should not decide what is constitutional and what isn't?
What the heck are you saying?
I am not going to go into a history of the Constitution and its Amendments unless my student asks me. For now you are an excellent example of the ignorant belligerence coming from the left, and for that I thank you. Please don't stop.
When I am done discussing ideology with my student then I will re-engage you all in the messy world of political cheer leading.
Have you ever thought about teaching at Trump U?
Carry on.
Ignore the cheerleaders - especially the ugly ones.
DiscoGary wrote:
agip wrote:
are you saying the 27 amendments are errors?
are you saying that the courts should not decide what is constitutional and what isn't?
What the heck are you saying?
I am not going to go into a history of the Constitution and its Amendments unless my student asks me. For now you are an excellent example of the ignorant belligerence coming from the left, and for that I thank you. Please don't stop.
When I am done discussing ideology with my student then I will re-engage you all in the messy world of political cheer leading.
ok cool. You don't have an answer. got it.
In the meantime, we understand that the leader conservatives voted in as president has advocated for violating the constitution in multiple ways: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, for cruel and unusual punishment, etc. All has has suggested breaking.
But that's ok by you because he is 'conservative.'
I do! wrote:
Carry on.
Ignore the cheerleaders - especially the ugly ones.
Agreed. Trump us the ugliest cheerleader of all time.
Trollminator wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
I am not going to go into a history of the Constitution and its Amendments unless my student asks me. For now you are an excellent example of the ignorant belligerence coming from the left, and for that I thank you. Please don't stop.
When I am done discussing ideology with my student then I will re-engage you all in the messy world of political cheer leading.
Have you ever thought about teaching at Trump U?
it burns! it burns!
Trump's People wrote:
Only in Trumpland. Lose office for being caught as a pervert. Earn even an YUGE percentage of the Trumper vote.
93 percent of North Dakota Republicans voted for a candidate who is now dropping out for being a peeping Tom. Despite being outed on May 20 for charges stemming from a peeping Tom incident, North Dakota’s GOP secretary of state nominee Will Gardner won 93 percent of the vote. Now, he’s officially dropped out of the race.
This is one of the problems of a primary system where you vote for your own party only.
How many votes was 93%? 930?