Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Again you are avoiding the basic question - do you think there is nothitn wrong with that? I didnt ask you about defining nepotism or precedents, I'm asking if you Rigged think there is nothing wrong. Severa posts later you still havent answered.

Still waiting for your opinion. Hard to answer even the simplest questions when you can’t use the Obama and Hillary card right?

Your every post is the Trump card, rip, rip, rip, as if you're lousy choice was an angel. I know a lot of people in the military, but you really take the cake. Were you kicked out or is it just another lie. With your handle I'd guess you're a liar. Learn politics before you spout off from your pie hole.

The difference is we own our vote and understood exactly what we would get out of the shady Hillary - a status quo president. Whatever Hillary corrupteness can be demonstrated or even hypothesized by the right is dwarfed by the total corruption of the WH by Trump, the destruction of our credibility on the global stage, the millions flowing into the Trump family coffers for favors, and even just by the complete lack of competence the mob boss wanna-be trump has displayed. So yeah the vote was easy.

You on the other hand thought you were voting for a genius and now you’re embarrassed you helped put a complete dud in the WH. The only thing you can celebrate on a daily basis is Hillary’s defeat to comfort yourself.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.

"Nepotism (n): favoritism shown on the basis of family relationship"

Sorry, but I'm not seeing anything about "taking salaries" in the definition of nepotism.

Just a guess, but I'm gonna guess that any government salary would barely amount to a drop in the bucket compared to the rewards that they are earning for their business interests through use of their roles in the Trump administration.

///

Care to try again? Perhaps with an honest post this time?

Not Rigged wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Still waiting for your opinion. Hard to answer even the simplest questions when you can’t use the Obama and Hillary card right?

Your every post is the Trump card, rip, rip, rip, as if you're lousy choice was an angel. I know a lot of people in the military, but you really take the cake. Were you kicked out or is it just another lie. With your handle I'd guess you're a liar. Learn politics before you spout off from your pie hole.

^ = Rigged’s trumper tantrum

PIO! wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.

"Nepotism (n): favoritism shown on the basis of family relationship"

Sorry, but I'm not seeing anything about "taking salaries" in the definition of nepotism.

Just a guess, but I'm gonna guess that any government salary would barely amount to a drop in the bucket compared to the rewards that they are earning for their business interests through use of their roles in the Trump administration.

///

Care to try again? Perhaps with an honest post this time?

Rigged isn’t capable of an honest post - or at least one that doesn’t involve Hillary or Obama. I asked him a few simple questions and he couldn’t help himself. He’s not going to answer whether he thinks the nepotism is ok, but we already know his answer. There is nothing a trumper wont support.

Trollminator wrote:

The difference is we own our vote and understood exactly what we would get out of the shady Hillary - a status quo president. Whatever Hillary corrupteness can be demonstrated or even hypothesized by the right is dwarfed by the total corruption of the WH by Trump, the destruction of our credibility on the global stage, the millions flowing into the Trump family coffers for favors, and even just by the complete lack of competence the mob boss wanna-be trump has displayed. So yeah the vote was easy.

You on the other hand thought you were voting for a genius and now you’re embarrassed you helped put a complete dud in the WH. The only thing you can celebrate on a daily basis is Hillary’s defeat to comfort yourself.

You're mental. Clinton paid for her daughter's wedding off guess who's money?

She and Bill stole millions, you're a blind ignorant sheep.

Millions flowing into the Trump family coffers for favors? What?

You are the sickest liberal on here. What you are describing is exactly what Clinton did, and you knew that coming in, yet you're okay with it, sick American. Military my a$$!

Here's your proof below: Yes, every link below is fake and so are the facts that they provide. Your links are incredibly accurate, without any wrong info. Dear God you are so blind and biased I thank God you're not actually in the military.

All that proof but let me guess, the Deep State protected her! Not a single prosecution but countless GOP-led investigations... you’ve got nothing. So Trump hasn’t been caught yet, fine so there is no crime on either side. So what you have is Hillary > Trump by a moonshot.... once you unfreeze out of your perma trumper state for just a sec you’ll see just how horrendous your dear leader has been.

Trollminator wrote:

At first I thought Rigged was just a troll in training, but over last few weeks he has displayed a real sick attachment to the dear leader and chronic obsession with Hillary and Obama. He can’t produce a single post without referring to one of them.

You'll notice it has little to no understanding of the post being replied to. It only recycles the same attacks with perhaps different content. This leads me to believe it's a paid trolls who has limited English skills and a seemingly endless fountain of propaganda from which to post

Trollminator wrote:

All that proof but let me guess, the Deep State protected her! Not a single prosecution but countless GOP-led investigations... you’ve got nothing. So Trump hasn’t been caught yet, fine so there is no crime on either side. So what you have is Hillary > Trump by a moonshot.... once you unfreeze out of your perma trumper state for just a sec you’ll see just how horrendous your dear leader has been.

You're really a scary person. Rest assured of one thing for the rest of your entire life, no one will ever accuse you of being intelligent. You're really not even remotely close to smart. Hillary got away with a lot and to not admit that is beyond bias, well beyond bias. Good luck with the few years and Trump winning again. I know, he can't win again, just like the first time.

PIO! wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.

"Nepotism (n): favoritism shown on the basis of family relationship"

Sorry, but I'm not seeing anything about "taking salaries" in the definition of nepotism.

Just a guess, but I'm gonna guess that any government salary would barely amount to a drop in the bucket compared to the rewards that they are earning for their business interests through use of their roles in the Trump administration.

///

Care to try again? Perhaps with an honest post this time?

The reason Trump, Ivanka and Jared are not taking salaries is so they can deduct the salary as a donation on their taxes. It is also important to not that all three happily bill the US government for every single possible expense. They are making money like bandits.

There is a rea$on that Trump plans his taxpayer footed trips to his properties as often as possible. US Government employees are forbidden to accept gifts. So they get to pay the maximum possible price for Trump rooms, Trump food, Trump parking, Trump golf carts, etc. No discounts allowed. GSA limits do not apply.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

At first I thought Rigged was just a troll in training, but over last few weeks he has displayed a real sick attachment to the dear leader and chronic obsession with Hillary and Obama. He can’t produce a single post without referring to one of them.

You'll notice it has little to no understanding of the post being replied to. It only recycles the same attacks with perhaps different content. This leads me to believe it's a paid trolls who has limited English skills and a seemingly endless fountain of propaganda from which to post

That is very possible. It actually would be refreshing if we knew it wasn’t someone that wasn’t able to vote. The trumper base here has pretty much narrowed down Rigged posting his usual Obama/Hillary stuff all day long then posting insults under different names and handle stealing in the evenings and weekends. Then there is Gary, but he’s on a different island.

lactate burns wrote:

Hey guys while yall chattin can u dudes just head on over to my thread and check it out i need some advice

That's really funny. DiscoGary? He's fat and stupid and would have a hard time getting out of his soundproof bulletproof padded cell, let alone taking of his tinfoil hat. Dude probably couldn't run a mile. Too busy trolling crazy conspiracy theories. And rigged is no better. What bunch of losers.

Trollminator wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

You'll notice it has little to no understanding of the post being replied to. It only recycles the same attacks with perhaps different content. This leads me to believe it's a paid trolls who has limited English skills and a seemingly endless fountain of propaganda from which to post

That is very possible. It actually would be refreshing if we knew it wasn’t someone that wasn’t able to vote. The trumper base here has pretty much narrowed down Rigged posting his usual Obama/Hillary stuff all day long then posting insults under different names and handle stealing in the evenings and weekends. Then there is Gary, but he’s on a different island.

There you go again, triggered lib Marine. Always assuming. As the late great Benny Hill once said,

Trollminator wrote:

All that proof but let me guess, the Deep State protected her! Not a single prosecution but countless GOP-led investigations... you’ve got nothing. So Trump hasn’t been caught yet, fine so there is no crime on either side. So what you have is Hillary > Trump by a moonshot.... once you unfreeze out of your perma trumper state for just a sec you’ll see just how horrendous your dear leader has been.

Can you stop bringing Clinton into every conversation. This thread is about Trump.

Another celebrity with high moral fiber wins GOP nomination in conservative Nevada.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/nevada-pimp-dennis-hof-wins-gop-primary-ousts-three-term-lawmaker/

HRC lover wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

All that proof but let me guess, the Deep State protected her! Not a single prosecution but countless GOP-led investigations... you’ve got nothing. So Trump hasn’t been caught yet, fine so there is no crime on either side. So what you have is Hillary > Trump by a moonshot.... once you unfreeze out of your perma trumper state for just a sec you’ll see just how horrendous your dear leader has been.

Can you stop bringing Clinton into every conversation. This thread is about Trump.

No and no. It's about his inauguration. Go back to page 1 before calling me a liar.

When you rip Trump for something that Clinton had already done---and you voted for her knowing that---you should have no expectations that her name won't be brought up as well.

If Trump had made the same false statements about Bosnia, with video proof mind you, you guys would be bringing it up all the time.

She clearly lied, thinking that no one would ever see the video, to make herself sound like she put herself in a dangerous situation---also known as bragging. You voted for her with knowledge of that, and then you think you've got the b@lls to tell someone to stop bringing her up.

I hope whoever brings it up doesn't stop. This thread will go on and on like Kip Litton. Eventually the left will get tired of being wrong and pointing the finger everywhere else but there own side.

How's that work for ya?

Trollminator wrote:

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

You'll notice it has little to no understanding of the post being replied to. It only recycles the same attacks with perhaps different content. This leads me to believe it's a paid trolls who has limited English skills and a seemingly endless fountain of propaganda from which to post

That is very possible. It actually would be refreshing if we knew it wasn’t someone that wasn’t able to vote. The trumper base here has pretty much narrowed down Rigged posting his usual Obama/Hillary stuff all day long then posting insults under different names and handle stealing in the evenings and weekends. Then there is Gary, but he’s on a different island.

Wrong. It's NOT DiscoGary. You're not working with too much upstairs, are ya fake Marine?

XY wrote:

Another celebrity with high moral fiber wins GOP nomination in conservative Nevada.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/nevada-pimp-dennis-hof-wins-gop-primary-ousts-three-term-lawmaker/

One on the den side wins too.

highest inflation at the producer level (3.1%) in six years, and gas prices moving steadily higher.

nice, GOP. Guns and butter = inflation. Thanks for eroding the value of my dollars. Great work. What's your next trick? Taking away healthcare? That is your specialty I know.

http://bloomberg.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=485740&cust=bloomberg-us&year=2018&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top