Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.
Trollminator wrote:
It boils down to something you stated previously and a bit more:
1. Trumpers have lost all values by continuing to support him. We know this is true because Trump has openly violated all supposed values of the right, has gone against the traditional agenda of the right, and has often done exactly what the GOP criticized Obama for trying to do for 8 years. The only explanation for continued support at this point is simply to spite liberals.
2. Trumpers are simpletons, they believe the world's problems are simple and that the solutions should also be simple. Trump appears to be a successful simpleton, so they love him and can't get enough of the kool aid.
3. Trumpers have been so desperate to see change they think is needed that they do not care about the who, how and the actual results. They are now infatuated with Trump for simply messing with the order, seeing past any and all failures and horrible decision making. This is what brought that famous German leader to power quickly, but Trumpers will keep denying this is nothing like that kind of blindness.
4. Trumpers have very short attention spans. Twitter is most effective, followed by the often outright fake headlines on FOX. There is no more need for real content, context and substance... trumpers don't need to see any facts, they are wholly satisfied with just the idea that something they like is happening.
5. Trumpers are hanging on desperately to this only "win" of their lifetimes. Thus far, Trumpism is a blip, a one-off. They know it, otherwise Hillary and Obama wouldn't be part of the daily discourse. Trumpers are unable to defend Trump by his own merits. Living in the past is the only way to keep their good feeling going.
The reality is since WW2 all the things Trumpers stand against are the things that have ensured peace and prosperity in this world. That a 400 lb toothless and uneducated citizen in a backwater town can't compete with others and has found a scapegoat in Trump's justifications for their failures does not change this reality. That we have seen historic peace in the world and record economic prosperity since WW2 under the type of democracy that Trumpers are against is proof of which system and kind of leadership works best. Lets keep revisiting the results of this new world order, the one in which the POTUS blasts our allies, throws his own people under the bus daily, sides with dictators he admires, lands giant kickbacks in the form of business deals... lets see if this new system will yield the most economic gain, general prosperity and peace in the world.
I find it hard to believe you lost the election when you clearly have such a firm grip on reality.
Ben There wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I find it hard to believe you lost the election when you clearly have such a firm grip on reality.
I do not recall seeing Trollminator's name on the 2016 ballot for president.
Haywire wrote:
If the deal goes haywire, what do you think should happen? Nothing?
Yes. Because nothing happened in the first place. This deal does not accomplish anything concrete or verifiable. Trump will get mad that he's not being sufficiently praised for doing basically nothing other than (yet again) heaping praise on a dictator and minting some commemorative coins. North Korea will resist his attempts to make something more ironclad, and then we'll be right back to comparing button sizes.
You just don’t get it wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
It boils down to something you stated previously and a bit more:
1. Trumpers have lost all values by continuing to support him. We know this is true because Trump has openly violated all supposed values of the right, has gone against the traditional agenda of the right, and has often done exactly what the GOP criticized Obama for trying to do for 8 years. The only explanation for continued support at this point is simply to spite liberals.
2. Trumpers are simpletons, they believe the world's problems are simple and that the solutions should also be simple. Trump appears to be a successful simpleton, so they love him and can't get enough of the kool aid.
3. Trumpers have been so desperate to see change they think is needed that they do not care about the who, how and the actual results. They are now infatuated with Trump for simply messing with the order, seeing past any and all failures and horrible decision making. This is what brought that famous German leader to power quickly, but Trumpers will keep denying this is nothing like that kind of blindness.
4. Trumpers have very short attention spans. Twitter is most effective, followed by the often outright fake headlines on FOX. There is no more need for real content, context and substance... trumpers don't need to see any facts, they are wholly satisfied with just the idea that something they like is happening.
5. Trumpers are hanging on desperately to this only "win" of their lifetimes. Thus far, Trumpism is a blip, a one-off. They know it, otherwise Hillary and Obama wouldn't be part of the daily discourse. Trumpers are unable to defend Trump by his own merits. Living in the past is the only way to keep their good feeling going.
The reality is since WW2 all the things Trumpers stand against are the things that have ensured peace and prosperity in this world. That a 400 lb toothless and uneducated citizen in a backwater town can't compete with others and has found a scapegoat in Trump's justifications for their failures does not change this reality. That we have seen historic peace in the world and record economic prosperity since WW2 under the type of democracy that Trumpers are against is proof of which system and kind of leadership works best. Lets keep revisiting the results of this new world order, the one in which the POTUS blasts our allies, throws his own people under the bus daily, sides with dictators he admires, lands giant kickbacks in the form of business deals... lets see if this new system will yield the most economic gain, general prosperity and peace in the world.
Hahahahahahaha
You are an idiot. Those are the most laughable generalizations I’ve seen in a long time. They are so out there that it doesn’t even merit a response. Wow, just wow.
It’s scary that there are people out there that actually think like you do. Scary.
Aka I’m right and again you can’t counter. Go ahead pick just one and try. Didn’t think so Rigged
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.
Again you are avoiding the basic question - do you think there is nothitn wrong with that? I didnt ask you about defining nepotism or precedents, I'm asking if you Rigged think there is nothing wrong. Severa posts later you still havent answered.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.
so you agree HRC and Bill did nothing wrong or even unsightly, right? When they took donations to their charity from other nations, and when HRC gave paid speeches.
Good! At least we are getting somewhere with your idiotic hypocrisy.
Trollminator wrote:
You just don’t get it wrote:
Hahahahahahaha
You are an idiot. Those are the most laughable generalizations I’ve seen in a long time. They are so out there that it doesn’t even merit a response. Wow, just wow.
It’s scary that there are people out there that actually think like you do. Scary.
Aka I’m right and again you can’t counter. Go ahead pick just one and try. Didn’t think so Rigged
TDS and PTSD is a dangerous combination, Trolly. Don't assume that any unregistered handle is me.
As a Marine, you were taught to never assume. You just broke that rule, soldier. Do better.
The North Koreans pledged to de-nuke in 1885, 1992, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2016. And you really think this is going to be different? You Republicans are really stupid people.
Noticer of baloney wrote:
The North Koreans pledged to de-nuke in 1885, 1992, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2016. And you really think this is going to be different? You Republicans are really stupid people.
Didn’t think NK had been around that long.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
As a Marine, you were taught to never assume. You just broke that rule, soldier. Do better.
Try again, this time by using the right term for someone serving in the Corps...
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Neither Jared nor Ivanka are taking salaries with her current government jobs, so it's not really nepotism, here. There is a precedent for this situation, btw. Back in the day, JFK hired his own brother to serve as Attorney General. You are making a lot of accusations about the other stuff. Unless, you have evidence of these loans, sweetened deals, etc, give it a rest.
Again you are avoiding the basic question - do you think there is nothitn wrong with that? I didnt ask you about defining nepotism or precedents, I'm asking if you Rigged think there is nothing wrong. Severa posts later you still havent answered.
Still waiting for your opinion. Hard to answer even the simplest questions when you can’t use the Obama and Hillary card right?
Noticer of baloney wrote:
The North Koreans pledged to de-nuke in 1885, 1992, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2016. And you really think this is going to be different? You Republicans are really stupid people.
At first I thought Rigged was just a troll in training, but over last few weeks he has displayed a real sick attachment to the dear leader and chronic obsession with Hillary and Obama. He can’t produce a single post without referring to one of them. So unfortunately he’s not a troll, just a sky high heap of stupid. He is 100% how agip described trumpers, he is all in on Trump simply to spite liberals. I’m afraid there are more of his kind than the DG-types who actually believe Trump is some sort of genius who is good for the country and world.
Trollminator wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Again you are avoiding the basic question - do you think there is nothitn wrong with that? I didnt ask you about defining nepotism or precedents, I'm asking if you Rigged think there is nothing wrong. Severa posts later you still havent answered.
Still waiting for your opinion. Hard to answer even the simplest questions when you can’t use the Obama and Hillary card right?
No, there is nothing wrong, Marine. Is that clear enough? Now, blouse those boots.
North Korea's 2012 pledge
I think little rocket man went back to firing off missiles after that pledge.
Trollminator wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Again you are avoiding the basic question - do you think there is nothitn wrong with that? I didnt ask you about defining nepotism or precedents, I'm asking if you Rigged think there is nothing wrong. Severa posts later you still havent answered.
Still waiting for your opinion. Hard to answer even the simplest questions when you can’t use the Obama and Hillary card right?
Why does your life revolve around knowing his opinion? Are you unable to formulate your own, soldier?
Oorah.
L L wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/n-korea-agrees-to-suspend-uranium-enrichment-nuclear-tests/2012/02/29/gIQAsxwAiR_story.html?noredirect=onNorth Korea's 2012 pledge
I think little rocket man went back to firing off missiles after that pledge.
Why wouldn’t he? There was a pansy in the WH then.
“Don’t cross this line or you’ll get it. Ok, ok. Don’t cross this one and I really mean it ghis time.”
L L wrote:
This whole North Korea thing was a distraction to coincide with the release of Ivanka and Jared's earnings since since donating their time to government work.
They have earned over $80M.
I think I smell some swampness.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/12/619101573/ivanka-trump-and-jared-kushner-earned-more-than-80-million-last-year-filings-sho
Genius Alert. It was a distraction, eh? Kinda like Hillary with Haiti, right? Funny how those distractions didn't bother you then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKmX93bX4QYYou forgot this part in the link above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8JDns7CAc0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeKZSz_w-PkLying Liberals are a dime a dozen. Hillary Clinton loss, so even though you scumbags voted for her, her corruptness didn't matter, eh?
And.... wrote:
L L wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/n-korea-agrees-to-suspend-uranium-enrichment-nuclear-tests/2012/02/29/gIQAsxwAiR_story.html?noredirect=onNorth Korea's 2012 pledge
I think little rocket man went back to firing off missiles after that pledge.
Why wouldn’t he? There was a pansy in the WH then.
“Don’t cross this line or you’ll get it. Ok, ok. Don’t cross this one and I really mean it ghis time.”
Sounds a lot like the one who said they were going to be so tough on China then completely caved in on ZTE. Or the one that said no one would be as tough on Russia and then paved the way for their continued influence in Syria and vouched for their inclusion in the G7. Or how about that POTUS who yelled on twitter at Kim and then it was all praise and concessions when they met face to face... yeah I remember that pansy.